A comparative macro-anatomic, mechanical and geometric morphometries study on tree and ground squirrel and rat

This study is carried out comparatively on throe rodent species. There were ten matured three squirrels (5 male and 5 female), ten matured ground squirrels (4 male and 6 female), and ten 60 day old rats (5 male and 5 female). Study material was lateral side of right mandible. Mandibles of tree and g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hakan Yalçın, Seyit Ali Kayış, Atilla Arslan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Selcuk University Press
Series:Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eurasianjvetsci.org/pdf.php3?id=61
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841561430780805120
author Hakan Yalçın
Seyit Ali Kayış
Atilla Arslan
author_facet Hakan Yalçın
Seyit Ali Kayış
Atilla Arslan
author_sort Hakan Yalçın
collection DOAJ
description This study is carried out comparatively on throe rodent species. There were ten matured three squirrels (5 male and 5 female), ten matured ground squirrels (4 male and 6 female), and ten 60 day old rats (5 male and 5 female). Study material was lateral side of right mandible. Mandibles of tree and ground squirrels and rats were compared m aero-anatomically. Comparing to squirrels, rats had a bone tip on the lateral side of rostro-ventral of mandibular notch, coronoid process was short and plain, and in the medial side, pterygoid fossa was deepper in the ground squirrels but not in the rats. Unlike mammals, three species had masseteric ridge that frames masseteric fossa dorsally and ventrally. In terms of some metric measurements (Sd, Sv, Ad, Td) taken on mandible, ground squirrel and rat were very similar. In addition, mechanical advantageous of masticatory muscles on the mandible of three species were calculated. In general, comparing to ground squirrel, tree squirrel had more mechanical advantageous of jaw muscles. However, comparison ot three squirrel to rat showed that tree squirrel had more advantageous in two jaw muscles (Sd, Sv), had disadvantageous in one masticatory muscles (Ad), and had no differences for the other two jaw muscles (Tv, Td). Comparing rats to ground squirrels, in terms of jaw muscles, showed that rats had more advantageous in three jaw muscles (Sd, Ad, Tv), but had no differences lor the other two (Sv, Td). In terms of dorsal fibers of the temporal muscles (Td), there were no differences for three species. In this study, three rodent species were compared for species and se* factors via Geometric Morphometries methods. For this purpose, 16 homologous landmarks, on the mandible, were used. It is found that the first two principle components (PCI and PC2) were able to separate three species clearly. The first two principle components were able to reveal 71% of the total shape variation (PCI: 37%, PC2: 34%). In addition, movements of landmarks in different species were analysed by means of deformation grid. Orthogonal comparison of shape data showed that three species differs statistically significantly.
format Article
id doaj-art-9d6e71c5e26744f1b78fb01765311d3c
institution Kabale University
issn 1309-6958
2146-1953
language English
publisher Selcuk University Press
record_format Article
series Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences
spelling doaj-art-9d6e71c5e26744f1b78fb01765311d3c2025-01-03T01:36:25ZengSelcuk University PressEurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1309-69582146-1953231839561A comparative macro-anatomic, mechanical and geometric morphometries study on tree and ground squirrel and ratHakan Yalçın0Seyit Ali Kayış1Atilla Arslan2Selçuk Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Anatomi Anabilimdalı, KONYASelçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi, Zootekni Bölümü Biyometri ve Genetik Anabilimdalı, KONYASelçuk Üniversitesi Fen Ed. Fakültesi Biyoloji Anabilimdalı, KONYAThis study is carried out comparatively on throe rodent species. There were ten matured three squirrels (5 male and 5 female), ten matured ground squirrels (4 male and 6 female), and ten 60 day old rats (5 male and 5 female). Study material was lateral side of right mandible. Mandibles of tree and ground squirrels and rats were compared m aero-anatomically. Comparing to squirrels, rats had a bone tip on the lateral side of rostro-ventral of mandibular notch, coronoid process was short and plain, and in the medial side, pterygoid fossa was deepper in the ground squirrels but not in the rats. Unlike mammals, three species had masseteric ridge that frames masseteric fossa dorsally and ventrally. In terms of some metric measurements (Sd, Sv, Ad, Td) taken on mandible, ground squirrel and rat were very similar. In addition, mechanical advantageous of masticatory muscles on the mandible of three species were calculated. In general, comparing to ground squirrel, tree squirrel had more mechanical advantageous of jaw muscles. However, comparison ot three squirrel to rat showed that tree squirrel had more advantageous in two jaw muscles (Sd, Sv), had disadvantageous in one masticatory muscles (Ad), and had no differences for the other two jaw muscles (Tv, Td). Comparing rats to ground squirrels, in terms of jaw muscles, showed that rats had more advantageous in three jaw muscles (Sd, Ad, Tv), but had no differences lor the other two (Sv, Td). In terms of dorsal fibers of the temporal muscles (Td), there were no differences for three species. In this study, three rodent species were compared for species and se* factors via Geometric Morphometries methods. For this purpose, 16 homologous landmarks, on the mandible, were used. It is found that the first two principle components (PCI and PC2) were able to separate three species clearly. The first two principle components were able to reveal 71% of the total shape variation (PCI: 37%, PC2: 34%). In addition, movements of landmarks in different species were analysed by means of deformation grid. Orthogonal comparison of shape data showed that three species differs statistically significantly.http://eurasianjvetsci.org/pdf.php3?id=61geometric morphometriessquirrelratmandibulaanatomy
spellingShingle Hakan Yalçın
Seyit Ali Kayış
Atilla Arslan
A comparative macro-anatomic, mechanical and geometric morphometries study on tree and ground squirrel and rat
Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences
geometric morphometries
squirrel
rat
mandibula
anatomy
title A comparative macro-anatomic, mechanical and geometric morphometries study on tree and ground squirrel and rat
title_full A comparative macro-anatomic, mechanical and geometric morphometries study on tree and ground squirrel and rat
title_fullStr A comparative macro-anatomic, mechanical and geometric morphometries study on tree and ground squirrel and rat
title_full_unstemmed A comparative macro-anatomic, mechanical and geometric morphometries study on tree and ground squirrel and rat
title_short A comparative macro-anatomic, mechanical and geometric morphometries study on tree and ground squirrel and rat
title_sort comparative macro anatomic mechanical and geometric morphometries study on tree and ground squirrel and rat
topic geometric morphometries
squirrel
rat
mandibula
anatomy
url http://eurasianjvetsci.org/pdf.php3?id=61
work_keys_str_mv AT hakanyalcın acomparativemacroanatomicmechanicalandgeometricmorphometriesstudyontreeandgroundsquirrelandrat
AT seyitalikayıs acomparativemacroanatomicmechanicalandgeometricmorphometriesstudyontreeandgroundsquirrelandrat
AT atillaarslan acomparativemacroanatomicmechanicalandgeometricmorphometriesstudyontreeandgroundsquirrelandrat
AT hakanyalcın comparativemacroanatomicmechanicalandgeometricmorphometriesstudyontreeandgroundsquirrelandrat
AT seyitalikayıs comparativemacroanatomicmechanicalandgeometricmorphometriesstudyontreeandgroundsquirrelandrat
AT atillaarslan comparativemacroanatomicmechanicalandgeometricmorphometriesstudyontreeandgroundsquirrelandrat