Effectiveness of Different Organic Solvent Additions to Water Samples for Reducing the Adsorption Effects of Organic Pesticides Using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry

This study systematically investigated the effect of organic solvent addition on the detection signal intensity of 15 organic pesticides in water using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–ESI–MS/MS). The analysis of chromatographic pea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yucan Liu, Xinyi Xu, Ying Wang, Yan Zhang, Jianbo Lu, Chengbin Liu, Jinming Duan, Hongwei Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Molecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/30/1/200
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841549085461446656
author Yucan Liu
Xinyi Xu
Ying Wang
Yan Zhang
Jianbo Lu
Chengbin Liu
Jinming Duan
Hongwei Sun
author_facet Yucan Liu
Xinyi Xu
Ying Wang
Yan Zhang
Jianbo Lu
Chengbin Liu
Jinming Duan
Hongwei Sun
author_sort Yucan Liu
collection DOAJ
description This study systematically investigated the effect of organic solvent addition on the detection signal intensity of 15 organic pesticides in water using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–ESI–MS/MS). The analysis of chromatographic peak area ratios in ultrapure water (UPW) versus 30% methanol (MeOH)–UPW showed that the adsorption effects (AEs, mainly from injection vials with weaker polarity) were the main factor influencing the detection intensity of the organic pesticides. The AEs varied with pesticide type and concentration, especially for those with high logK<sub>ow</sub> values and longer retention times, such as malathion, triadimefon, prometryn, S–metolachlor, diazinon, and profenofos. Significant differences were observed in the ability of five organic solvents (MeOH, dimethyl sulfoxide, isopropanol, acetonitrile, and acetone) to reduce AEs, with MeOH being the most effective. Optimal solvent ratios were determined to minimize AEs in aqueous solutions. Additionally, plastic injection vials caused greater AEs than glass injection vials, but the addition of organic solvents increased the detection intensity of the analytes for vials of both materials. Density functional theory calculations of the binding energies between pesticides (diazinon, malathion, and S–metolachlor) and vial materials further confirmed the effect of AE on the detection intensity of the analytes. This study showed that the addition of MeOH to real water samples effectively reduced or eliminated the effects of AEs, achieving a good linearity of calibration curves (0.05/0.1–5 μg/L, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9853–0.9998), high sensitivity (LOD = 5–32 ng/L), precision (RSD = 1.4–14.5%), and accuracy (average recoveries = 80.6–121.8%). These results provide technical and methodological support for mitigating the effects of AEs on pesticide detection in water using UHPLC–ESI–MS/MS.
format Article
id doaj-art-9b556c74461744aeacb4b714d6b627ae
institution Kabale University
issn 1420-3049
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Molecules
spelling doaj-art-9b556c74461744aeacb4b714d6b627ae2025-01-10T13:19:11ZengMDPI AGMolecules1420-30492025-01-0130120010.3390/molecules30010200Effectiveness of Different Organic Solvent Additions to Water Samples for Reducing the Adsorption Effects of Organic Pesticides Using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass SpectrometryYucan Liu0Xinyi Xu1Ying Wang2Yan Zhang3Jianbo Lu4Chengbin Liu5Jinming Duan6Hongwei Sun7School of Civil Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, ChinaThe Institute of Agro–Food Standards and Testing Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, ChinaCentre for Water Management and Reuse, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Campus, Adelaide, SA 5095, AustraliaSchool of Environmental and Materials Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, ChinaThis study systematically investigated the effect of organic solvent addition on the detection signal intensity of 15 organic pesticides in water using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–ESI–MS/MS). The analysis of chromatographic peak area ratios in ultrapure water (UPW) versus 30% methanol (MeOH)–UPW showed that the adsorption effects (AEs, mainly from injection vials with weaker polarity) were the main factor influencing the detection intensity of the organic pesticides. The AEs varied with pesticide type and concentration, especially for those with high logK<sub>ow</sub> values and longer retention times, such as malathion, triadimefon, prometryn, S–metolachlor, diazinon, and profenofos. Significant differences were observed in the ability of five organic solvents (MeOH, dimethyl sulfoxide, isopropanol, acetonitrile, and acetone) to reduce AEs, with MeOH being the most effective. Optimal solvent ratios were determined to minimize AEs in aqueous solutions. Additionally, plastic injection vials caused greater AEs than glass injection vials, but the addition of organic solvents increased the detection intensity of the analytes for vials of both materials. Density functional theory calculations of the binding energies between pesticides (diazinon, malathion, and S–metolachlor) and vial materials further confirmed the effect of AE on the detection intensity of the analytes. This study showed that the addition of MeOH to real water samples effectively reduced or eliminated the effects of AEs, achieving a good linearity of calibration curves (0.05/0.1–5 μg/L, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9853–0.9998), high sensitivity (LOD = 5–32 ng/L), precision (RSD = 1.4–14.5%), and accuracy (average recoveries = 80.6–121.8%). These results provide technical and methodological support for mitigating the effects of AEs on pesticide detection in water using UHPLC–ESI–MS/MS.https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/30/1/200adsorption effectUHPLC–ESI–MS/MSorganic pesticidesdirect injection techniquedetection signal intensityorganic solvent
spellingShingle Yucan Liu
Xinyi Xu
Ying Wang
Yan Zhang
Jianbo Lu
Chengbin Liu
Jinming Duan
Hongwei Sun
Effectiveness of Different Organic Solvent Additions to Water Samples for Reducing the Adsorption Effects of Organic Pesticides Using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Molecules
adsorption effect
UHPLC–ESI–MS/MS
organic pesticides
direct injection technique
detection signal intensity
organic solvent
title Effectiveness of Different Organic Solvent Additions to Water Samples for Reducing the Adsorption Effects of Organic Pesticides Using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
title_full Effectiveness of Different Organic Solvent Additions to Water Samples for Reducing the Adsorption Effects of Organic Pesticides Using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Different Organic Solvent Additions to Water Samples for Reducing the Adsorption Effects of Organic Pesticides Using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Different Organic Solvent Additions to Water Samples for Reducing the Adsorption Effects of Organic Pesticides Using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
title_short Effectiveness of Different Organic Solvent Additions to Water Samples for Reducing the Adsorption Effects of Organic Pesticides Using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
title_sort effectiveness of different organic solvent additions to water samples for reducing the adsorption effects of organic pesticides using ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
topic adsorption effect
UHPLC–ESI–MS/MS
organic pesticides
direct injection technique
detection signal intensity
organic solvent
url https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/30/1/200
work_keys_str_mv AT yucanliu effectivenessofdifferentorganicsolventadditionstowatersamplesforreducingtheadsorptioneffectsoforganicpesticidesusingultrahighperformanceliquidchromatographytandemmassspectrometry
AT xinyixu effectivenessofdifferentorganicsolventadditionstowatersamplesforreducingtheadsorptioneffectsoforganicpesticidesusingultrahighperformanceliquidchromatographytandemmassspectrometry
AT yingwang effectivenessofdifferentorganicsolventadditionstowatersamplesforreducingtheadsorptioneffectsoforganicpesticidesusingultrahighperformanceliquidchromatographytandemmassspectrometry
AT yanzhang effectivenessofdifferentorganicsolventadditionstowatersamplesforreducingtheadsorptioneffectsoforganicpesticidesusingultrahighperformanceliquidchromatographytandemmassspectrometry
AT jianbolu effectivenessofdifferentorganicsolventadditionstowatersamplesforreducingtheadsorptioneffectsoforganicpesticidesusingultrahighperformanceliquidchromatographytandemmassspectrometry
AT chengbinliu effectivenessofdifferentorganicsolventadditionstowatersamplesforreducingtheadsorptioneffectsoforganicpesticidesusingultrahighperformanceliquidchromatographytandemmassspectrometry
AT jinmingduan effectivenessofdifferentorganicsolventadditionstowatersamplesforreducingtheadsorptioneffectsoforganicpesticidesusingultrahighperformanceliquidchromatographytandemmassspectrometry
AT hongweisun effectivenessofdifferentorganicsolventadditionstowatersamplesforreducingtheadsorptioneffectsoforganicpesticidesusingultrahighperformanceliquidchromatographytandemmassspectrometry