The ethical acceptability of human enhancement technologies: A cross-country Q-study of the perception of insideables

This paper aims to identify the ethical considerations driving the acceptance of and resistance to the use of insideable technology for human enhancement purposes, which are crucial to understand for the development of the cyborg technology market and businesses. While the literature privileges quan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stéphanie Gauttier, Mario Arias-Oliva, Kiyoshi Murata, Jorge Pelegrín-Borondo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-08-01
Series:Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000525
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846141686621667328
author Stéphanie Gauttier
Mario Arias-Oliva
Kiyoshi Murata
Jorge Pelegrín-Borondo
author_facet Stéphanie Gauttier
Mario Arias-Oliva
Kiyoshi Murata
Jorge Pelegrín-Borondo
author_sort Stéphanie Gauttier
collection DOAJ
description This paper aims to identify the ethical considerations driving the acceptance of and resistance to the use of insideable technology for human enhancement purposes, which are crucial to understand for the development of the cyborg technology market and businesses. While the literature privileges quantitative approaches, investigations focused on a strand of ethical theory or a specific value, this study adopts a qualitative and holistic approach. Based on prior interview data and a literature review, 33 items representing various ethical considerations of interest are identified. A qualitative Q-study was conducted, in which 55 individuals in three different countries expressed their points of view on insideables regarding these items. Hence, four different views are presented, highlighting drivers of acceptance of human enhancement technologies, conditional acceptance, and mere rejection. These views reveal the trade-offs between values made by respondents, shedding light on the ethical bricolage at play. The role of ethical concerns and theories in models to study the acceptance of human enhancement technologies and their potential business implications are discussed.
format Article
id doaj-art-9a7046d08a3c4d498ebac452637f615d
institution Kabale University
issn 2949-8821
language English
publishDate 2024-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans
spelling doaj-art-9a7046d08a3c4d498ebac452637f615d2024-12-04T05:15:05ZengElsevierComputers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans2949-88212024-08-0122100092The ethical acceptability of human enhancement technologies: A cross-country Q-study of the perception of insideablesStéphanie Gauttier0Mario Arias-Oliva1Kiyoshi Murata2Jorge Pelegrín-Borondo3Grenoble Ecole de Management, 12 Rue Pierre Sémard, 38000, Grenoble, France; Corresponding author.Complutense University of Madrid, Av. Complutense, S/n, Moncloa - Aravaca, 28040, Madrid, SpainMeiji University, 1 Chome-1 Kanda Surugadai, Chiyoda City, Tokyo 101-0062, JapanUniversidad de La Rioja, Avda. de La Paz 93-103, 26006, Logroño. La Rioja. SpainThis paper aims to identify the ethical considerations driving the acceptance of and resistance to the use of insideable technology for human enhancement purposes, which are crucial to understand for the development of the cyborg technology market and businesses. While the literature privileges quantitative approaches, investigations focused on a strand of ethical theory or a specific value, this study adopts a qualitative and holistic approach. Based on prior interview data and a literature review, 33 items representing various ethical considerations of interest are identified. A qualitative Q-study was conducted, in which 55 individuals in three different countries expressed their points of view on insideables regarding these items. Hence, four different views are presented, highlighting drivers of acceptance of human enhancement technologies, conditional acceptance, and mere rejection. These views reveal the trade-offs between values made by respondents, shedding light on the ethical bricolage at play. The role of ethical concerns and theories in models to study the acceptance of human enhancement technologies and their potential business implications are discussed.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000525Technology acceptanceQ-methodEthical bricolage
spellingShingle Stéphanie Gauttier
Mario Arias-Oliva
Kiyoshi Murata
Jorge Pelegrín-Borondo
The ethical acceptability of human enhancement technologies: A cross-country Q-study of the perception of insideables
Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans
Technology acceptance
Q-method
Ethical bricolage
title The ethical acceptability of human enhancement technologies: A cross-country Q-study of the perception of insideables
title_full The ethical acceptability of human enhancement technologies: A cross-country Q-study of the perception of insideables
title_fullStr The ethical acceptability of human enhancement technologies: A cross-country Q-study of the perception of insideables
title_full_unstemmed The ethical acceptability of human enhancement technologies: A cross-country Q-study of the perception of insideables
title_short The ethical acceptability of human enhancement technologies: A cross-country Q-study of the perception of insideables
title_sort ethical acceptability of human enhancement technologies a cross country q study of the perception of insideables
topic Technology acceptance
Q-method
Ethical bricolage
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000525
work_keys_str_mv AT stephaniegauttier theethicalacceptabilityofhumanenhancementtechnologiesacrosscountryqstudyoftheperceptionofinsideables
AT marioariasoliva theethicalacceptabilityofhumanenhancementtechnologiesacrosscountryqstudyoftheperceptionofinsideables
AT kiyoshimurata theethicalacceptabilityofhumanenhancementtechnologiesacrosscountryqstudyoftheperceptionofinsideables
AT jorgepelegrinborondo theethicalacceptabilityofhumanenhancementtechnologiesacrosscountryqstudyoftheperceptionofinsideables
AT stephaniegauttier ethicalacceptabilityofhumanenhancementtechnologiesacrosscountryqstudyoftheperceptionofinsideables
AT marioariasoliva ethicalacceptabilityofhumanenhancementtechnologiesacrosscountryqstudyoftheperceptionofinsideables
AT kiyoshimurata ethicalacceptabilityofhumanenhancementtechnologiesacrosscountryqstudyoftheperceptionofinsideables
AT jorgepelegrinborondo ethicalacceptabilityofhumanenhancementtechnologiesacrosscountryqstudyoftheperceptionofinsideables