Lifetime quality of life and cost consequences of delays in endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Singapore healthcare perspective

Objectives Endovascular therapy (EVT) significantly improves clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), while the time of EVT initiation after stroke onset influences both patient clinical outcomes and healthcare costs. This study determined the impact of EVT treatment delay on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mayank Goyal, Weiyi Ni, Deidre Anne De Silva, Yu Li Ng, Kelvin Tan, Wolfgang G Kunz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e036517.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841554269274112000
author Mayank Goyal
Weiyi Ni
Deidre Anne De Silva
Yu Li Ng
Kelvin Tan
Wolfgang G Kunz
author_facet Mayank Goyal
Weiyi Ni
Deidre Anne De Silva
Yu Li Ng
Kelvin Tan
Wolfgang G Kunz
author_sort Mayank Goyal
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Endovascular therapy (EVT) significantly improves clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), while the time of EVT initiation after stroke onset influences both patient clinical outcomes and healthcare costs. This study determined the impact of EVT treatment delay on cost effectiveness of EVT in the Singapore healthcare setting.Design A short-term decision tree and long-term Markov health state transition model was constructed. For each time window of symptom onset to EVT, the probability of receiving EVT or non-EVT treatment was varied, thereby varying clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale scores), short-term costs and long-term modelled (lifetime) costs; all of which were used in calculating an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EVT vs non-EVT treatment. Clinical outcomes and cost data were derived from clinical trials, literature, expert opinion, electronic medical records and community-based surveys from Singapore. Deterministic one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the uncertainty of the model. The willingness to pay for per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was set to Singapore $50 000 (US$36 500).Setting Singapore healthcare perspective.Participants The model included patients with AIS in Singapore.Interventions EVT performed within 6 hours of stroke onset.Outcome measures The model estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and net monetary benefits (NMB) for EVT versus non-EVT treatment, varied by time from symptom onset to time of treatment.Results EVT performed between 61 min and 120 min after the stroke onset was most cost-effective time window to perform EVT in the Singapore population, with an ICER of Singapore $7197 per QALY (US$5254) for performing EVT at 61–120 min versus 121–180 min. The resulting incremental NMB associated with receipt of EVT at the earlier time point is Singapore $39 827 (US$29 074) per patient at the willingness-to-pay threshold of Singapore $50 000. Each hour delay in EVT resulted in an average loss of 0.54 QALYs and 195.35 healthy days, with an average net monetary loss of Singapore $26 255 (US$19 166).Conclusions From the Singapore healthcare perspective, although EVT is more expensive than alternative treatments in the short term, the lifetime ICER is below the willingness-to-pay threshold. Thus, healthcare policies and procedures should aim to improve efficiency of pre-hospital and in-hospital workflow processes to reduce the onset-to-puncture duration.
format Article
id doaj-art-99903527eb2f448c9cec7948a9ca1b56
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-99903527eb2f448c9cec7948a9ca1b562025-01-08T15:50:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-09-0110910.1136/bmjopen-2019-036517Lifetime quality of life and cost consequences of delays in endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Singapore healthcare perspectiveMayank Goyal0Weiyi Ni1Deidre Anne De Silva2Yu Li Ng3Kelvin Tan4Wolfgang G Kunz52 Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaHealth Economics and Reimbursement, Medtronic Neurovascular, Irvine, California, USANational Neuroscience Institute - Singapore General Hospital Campus, SingaporeResearch and Evaluation Division, Ministry of Health, SingaporeSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore18 Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, GermanyObjectives Endovascular therapy (EVT) significantly improves clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), while the time of EVT initiation after stroke onset influences both patient clinical outcomes and healthcare costs. This study determined the impact of EVT treatment delay on cost effectiveness of EVT in the Singapore healthcare setting.Design A short-term decision tree and long-term Markov health state transition model was constructed. For each time window of symptom onset to EVT, the probability of receiving EVT or non-EVT treatment was varied, thereby varying clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale scores), short-term costs and long-term modelled (lifetime) costs; all of which were used in calculating an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EVT vs non-EVT treatment. Clinical outcomes and cost data were derived from clinical trials, literature, expert opinion, electronic medical records and community-based surveys from Singapore. Deterministic one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the uncertainty of the model. The willingness to pay for per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was set to Singapore $50 000 (US$36 500).Setting Singapore healthcare perspective.Participants The model included patients with AIS in Singapore.Interventions EVT performed within 6 hours of stroke onset.Outcome measures The model estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and net monetary benefits (NMB) for EVT versus non-EVT treatment, varied by time from symptom onset to time of treatment.Results EVT performed between 61 min and 120 min after the stroke onset was most cost-effective time window to perform EVT in the Singapore population, with an ICER of Singapore $7197 per QALY (US$5254) for performing EVT at 61–120 min versus 121–180 min. The resulting incremental NMB associated with receipt of EVT at the earlier time point is Singapore $39 827 (US$29 074) per patient at the willingness-to-pay threshold of Singapore $50 000. Each hour delay in EVT resulted in an average loss of 0.54 QALYs and 195.35 healthy days, with an average net monetary loss of Singapore $26 255 (US$19 166).Conclusions From the Singapore healthcare perspective, although EVT is more expensive than alternative treatments in the short term, the lifetime ICER is below the willingness-to-pay threshold. Thus, healthcare policies and procedures should aim to improve efficiency of pre-hospital and in-hospital workflow processes to reduce the onset-to-puncture duration.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e036517.full
spellingShingle Mayank Goyal
Weiyi Ni
Deidre Anne De Silva
Yu Li Ng
Kelvin Tan
Wolfgang G Kunz
Lifetime quality of life and cost consequences of delays in endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Singapore healthcare perspective
BMJ Open
title Lifetime quality of life and cost consequences of delays in endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Singapore healthcare perspective
title_full Lifetime quality of life and cost consequences of delays in endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Singapore healthcare perspective
title_fullStr Lifetime quality of life and cost consequences of delays in endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Singapore healthcare perspective
title_full_unstemmed Lifetime quality of life and cost consequences of delays in endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Singapore healthcare perspective
title_short Lifetime quality of life and cost consequences of delays in endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Singapore healthcare perspective
title_sort lifetime quality of life and cost consequences of delays in endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke a cost effectiveness analysis from a singapore healthcare perspective
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e036517.full
work_keys_str_mv AT mayankgoyal lifetimequalityoflifeandcostconsequencesofdelaysinendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeacosteffectivenessanalysisfromasingaporehealthcareperspective
AT weiyini lifetimequalityoflifeandcostconsequencesofdelaysinendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeacosteffectivenessanalysisfromasingaporehealthcareperspective
AT deidreannedesilva lifetimequalityoflifeandcostconsequencesofdelaysinendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeacosteffectivenessanalysisfromasingaporehealthcareperspective
AT yuling lifetimequalityoflifeandcostconsequencesofdelaysinendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeacosteffectivenessanalysisfromasingaporehealthcareperspective
AT kelvintan lifetimequalityoflifeandcostconsequencesofdelaysinendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeacosteffectivenessanalysisfromasingaporehealthcareperspective
AT wolfganggkunz lifetimequalityoflifeandcostconsequencesofdelaysinendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeacosteffectivenessanalysisfromasingaporehealthcareperspective