Resilience Analysis of Airport Systems Based on Improved Bayesian Networks
Abstract Modern airports, as pivotal nodes in global transportation networks, face increasing resilience challenges from compound threats such as extreme weather events and cyberattacks. However, current assessment methods primarily rely on subjective evaluations and lack probabilistic reasoning to...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-025-00914-4 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849234463253331968 |
|---|---|
| author | Jiuxia Guo Xin Tong Yungui Yang Jiang Yuan Siying Xu |
| author_facet | Jiuxia Guo Xin Tong Yungui Yang Jiang Yuan Siying Xu |
| author_sort | Jiuxia Guo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Modern airports, as pivotal nodes in global transportation networks, face increasing resilience challenges from compound threats such as extreme weather events and cyberattacks. However, current assessment methods primarily rely on subjective evaluations and lack probabilistic reasoning to account for the dynamic interdependencies among resilience factors. To address this gap, this study presents a hybrid Bayesian network–best worst method (BN–BWM) framework aimed at improving the accuracy and practicality of airport system resilience assessments. While Bayesian networks are effective for modeling complex probabilistic dependencies, expert-based probability assignments often introduce subjectivity. To mitigate this, we apply the best worst method (BWM) to conduct systematic pairwise comparison. Building on this, we leverage the BWM’s systematic pairwise comparisons, conducted with 10 aviation experts, to generate conditional probability tables for the Bayesian network. The results indicate that large airports demonstrate higher resilience levels (84–85%), whereas medium-sized airports exhibit moderate resilience (79%). Sensitivity analysis identifies key factors influencing resilience, including emergency repair systems and personnel capabilities, thereby offering actionable insights into improving airport operations. This study presents a robust, data-driven framework that enhances the objectivity and accuracy of resilience evaluations, providing theoretical support for sustainable airport management and operational safety. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-97e7999d181c46e890f3662b511c43d0 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1875-6883 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | Springer |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems |
| spelling | doaj-art-97e7999d181c46e890f3662b511c43d02025-08-20T04:03:07ZengSpringerInternational Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems1875-68832025-07-0118112110.1007/s44196-025-00914-4Resilience Analysis of Airport Systems Based on Improved Bayesian NetworksJiuxia Guo0Xin Tong1Yungui Yang2Jiang Yuan3Siying Xu4College of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation Flight University of ChinaCollege of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation Flight University of ChinaCollege of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation Flight University of ChinaCollege of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation Flight University of ChinaOperation Supervisory Center, Civil Aviation Administration of ChinaAbstract Modern airports, as pivotal nodes in global transportation networks, face increasing resilience challenges from compound threats such as extreme weather events and cyberattacks. However, current assessment methods primarily rely on subjective evaluations and lack probabilistic reasoning to account for the dynamic interdependencies among resilience factors. To address this gap, this study presents a hybrid Bayesian network–best worst method (BN–BWM) framework aimed at improving the accuracy and practicality of airport system resilience assessments. While Bayesian networks are effective for modeling complex probabilistic dependencies, expert-based probability assignments often introduce subjectivity. To mitigate this, we apply the best worst method (BWM) to conduct systematic pairwise comparison. Building on this, we leverage the BWM’s systematic pairwise comparisons, conducted with 10 aviation experts, to generate conditional probability tables for the Bayesian network. The results indicate that large airports demonstrate higher resilience levels (84–85%), whereas medium-sized airports exhibit moderate resilience (79%). Sensitivity analysis identifies key factors influencing resilience, including emergency repair systems and personnel capabilities, thereby offering actionable insights into improving airport operations. This study presents a robust, data-driven framework that enhances the objectivity and accuracy of resilience evaluations, providing theoretical support for sustainable airport management and operational safety.https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-025-00914-4Airport systemResilience evaluationBest-worst method (BWM)Sensitivity analysis |
| spellingShingle | Jiuxia Guo Xin Tong Yungui Yang Jiang Yuan Siying Xu Resilience Analysis of Airport Systems Based on Improved Bayesian Networks International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems Airport system Resilience evaluation Best-worst method (BWM) Sensitivity analysis |
| title | Resilience Analysis of Airport Systems Based on Improved Bayesian Networks |
| title_full | Resilience Analysis of Airport Systems Based on Improved Bayesian Networks |
| title_fullStr | Resilience Analysis of Airport Systems Based on Improved Bayesian Networks |
| title_full_unstemmed | Resilience Analysis of Airport Systems Based on Improved Bayesian Networks |
| title_short | Resilience Analysis of Airport Systems Based on Improved Bayesian Networks |
| title_sort | resilience analysis of airport systems based on improved bayesian networks |
| topic | Airport system Resilience evaluation Best-worst method (BWM) Sensitivity analysis |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-025-00914-4 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jiuxiaguo resilienceanalysisofairportsystemsbasedonimprovedbayesiannetworks AT xintong resilienceanalysisofairportsystemsbasedonimprovedbayesiannetworks AT yunguiyang resilienceanalysisofairportsystemsbasedonimprovedbayesiannetworks AT jiangyuan resilienceanalysisofairportsystemsbasedonimprovedbayesiannetworks AT siyingxu resilienceanalysisofairportsystemsbasedonimprovedbayesiannetworks |