Comparison of live‐trapping and noninvasive genetic sampling to assess patch occupancy by New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis) rabbits

ABSTRACT The New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis) is a species of high conservation priority in the northeastern United States and a candidate for federal listing under the Endangered Species Act. Eastern cottontails are abundantly distributed and similar in appearance to New England c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Howard J. Kilpatrick, Travis J. Goodie, Adrienne I. Kovach
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-12-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.330
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846120297558704128
author Howard J. Kilpatrick
Travis J. Goodie
Adrienne I. Kovach
author_facet Howard J. Kilpatrick
Travis J. Goodie
Adrienne I. Kovach
author_sort Howard J. Kilpatrick
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT The New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis) is a species of high conservation priority in the northeastern United States and a candidate for federal listing under the Endangered Species Act. Eastern cottontails are abundantly distributed and similar in appearance to New England cottontails. Our objective was to compare cost, effort, and effectiveness of live‐trapping and noninvasive genetic monitoring for assessing patch occupancy by New England cottontail. We collected 113 tissue samples and 240 fecal pellets samples for diagnostic genetic testing to detect species presence and assess the proportion of samples consisted of New England and eastern cottontail on 5 study sites in Connecticut in 2008 and 2009. Both methods detected presence of New England cottontail at 4 of 5 sites. Overall proportion of DNA samples consisted of New England cottontail was similar between sampling methods (χ2 = 0.189, P = 0.664). However, species composition on individual sites was inconsistent between methods and no clear pattern of bias was discernible. Mean cost per DNA sample to collect and analyze was US$433 for tissue samples and US$33 for fecal pellets. Samples collected per person‐day of effort were 40 for fecal samples and 0.7 for tissue samples. Genetic monitoring via noninvasive fecal sampling was a low‐cost, time‐efficient method for assessing species occupancy, but development of an optimal sampling strategy is needed to evaluate composition and distributions of species on sympatrically occupied sites. © 2013 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-96dc1eb7601f4518bca666aa2fbad1d6
institution Kabale University
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2013-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-96dc1eb7601f4518bca666aa2fbad1d62024-12-16T12:21:16ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402013-12-0137490190510.1002/wsb.330Comparison of live‐trapping and noninvasive genetic sampling to assess patch occupancy by New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis) rabbitsHoward J. Kilpatrick0Travis J. Goodie1Adrienne I. Kovach2Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental ProtectionWildlife Division391 Route 32North FranklinCT06254USAWildlife and Fisheries Conservation CenterUniversity of Connecticut1376 Storrs Road, Unit 4087StorrsCT06269USADepartment of Natural Resources and the EnvironmentUniversity of New Hampshire46 College RoadDurhamNH03824USAABSTRACT The New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis) is a species of high conservation priority in the northeastern United States and a candidate for federal listing under the Endangered Species Act. Eastern cottontails are abundantly distributed and similar in appearance to New England cottontails. Our objective was to compare cost, effort, and effectiveness of live‐trapping and noninvasive genetic monitoring for assessing patch occupancy by New England cottontail. We collected 113 tissue samples and 240 fecal pellets samples for diagnostic genetic testing to detect species presence and assess the proportion of samples consisted of New England and eastern cottontail on 5 study sites in Connecticut in 2008 and 2009. Both methods detected presence of New England cottontail at 4 of 5 sites. Overall proportion of DNA samples consisted of New England cottontail was similar between sampling methods (χ2 = 0.189, P = 0.664). However, species composition on individual sites was inconsistent between methods and no clear pattern of bias was discernible. Mean cost per DNA sample to collect and analyze was US$433 for tissue samples and US$33 for fecal pellets. Samples collected per person‐day of effort were 40 for fecal samples and 0.7 for tissue samples. Genetic monitoring via noninvasive fecal sampling was a low‐cost, time‐efficient method for assessing species occupancy, but development of an optimal sampling strategy is needed to evaluate composition and distributions of species on sympatrically occupied sites. © 2013 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.330fecal DNANew England cottontailsampling strategySylvilagus transitionalistissue DNA
spellingShingle Howard J. Kilpatrick
Travis J. Goodie
Adrienne I. Kovach
Comparison of live‐trapping and noninvasive genetic sampling to assess patch occupancy by New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis) rabbits
Wildlife Society Bulletin
fecal DNA
New England cottontail
sampling strategy
Sylvilagus transitionalis
tissue DNA
title Comparison of live‐trapping and noninvasive genetic sampling to assess patch occupancy by New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis) rabbits
title_full Comparison of live‐trapping and noninvasive genetic sampling to assess patch occupancy by New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis) rabbits
title_fullStr Comparison of live‐trapping and noninvasive genetic sampling to assess patch occupancy by New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis) rabbits
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of live‐trapping and noninvasive genetic sampling to assess patch occupancy by New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis) rabbits
title_short Comparison of live‐trapping and noninvasive genetic sampling to assess patch occupancy by New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis) rabbits
title_sort comparison of live trapping and noninvasive genetic sampling to assess patch occupancy by new england cottontail sylvilagus transitionalis rabbits
topic fecal DNA
New England cottontail
sampling strategy
Sylvilagus transitionalis
tissue DNA
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.330
work_keys_str_mv AT howardjkilpatrick comparisonoflivetrappingandnoninvasivegeneticsamplingtoassesspatchoccupancybynewenglandcottontailsylvilagustransitionalisrabbits
AT travisjgoodie comparisonoflivetrappingandnoninvasivegeneticsamplingtoassesspatchoccupancybynewenglandcottontailsylvilagustransitionalisrabbits
AT adrienneikovach comparisonoflivetrappingandnoninvasivegeneticsamplingtoassesspatchoccupancybynewenglandcottontailsylvilagustransitionalisrabbits