The Influence of Vowels on the Identification of Spoken Disyllabic Words in the Malayalam Language for Individuals with Hearing Loss
Background/Objectives: The present study investigates the reasons for better recognition of disyllabic words in Malayalam among individuals with hearing loss. This research was conducted in three experiments. Experiment 1 measured the psychometric properties (slope, intercept, and maximum scores) of...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | Diagnostics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/14/23/2707 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Background/Objectives: The present study investigates the reasons for better recognition of disyllabic words in Malayalam among individuals with hearing loss. This research was conducted in three experiments. Experiment 1 measured the psychometric properties (slope, intercept, and maximum scores) of disyllabic wordlists. Experiment 2 examined PB<sub>max</sub> scores across varying degrees of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and compared these findings with studies in other Indian and global languages. Experiment 3 analyzed the recognition performance of different vowel combinations across varying degrees of hearing loss. Methods: Experiment 1: Psychometric functions for disyllabic word recognition were derived from 45 individuals with normal hearing. Word recognition was tested in quiet at nine hearing levels ranging from −10 to +40 dB HL. Experiment 2: 1000 participants with SNHL were categorized by hearing loss severity (mild, moderate, moderately severe, severe, and profound). Word recognition scores, including PB<sub>max</sub>, were analyzed and compared across severity levels. Experiment 3: Percent error scores for 17 vowel combinations were assessed in 37 participants with SNHL. Ten disyllabic words represented each combination. Results: Disyllabic wordlists showed significantly higher word recognition scores than monosyllabic lists across all degrees of hearing loss. Individuals with mild-to-moderately severe SNHL achieved higher PB<sub>max</sub> scores, with performance declining at severe- and profound-loss levels. The higher recognition of disyllabic words was attributed to contextual cues and low-frequency vowel-based information, particularly benefiting those with residual low-frequency hearing. Error analysis highlighted the influence of specific vowel combinations on word recognition performance. Conclusions: Disyllabic words are easier to recognize than monosyllabic words for individuals with SNHL due to their rich contextual and low-frequency energy cues. Disyllabic wordlists sustain higher recognition scores up to moderately severe hearing loss but show a marked decline with more severe losses. The phonemic balance of wordlists and vowel combinations significantly influences word recognition, emphasizing the importance of these factors in developing wordlists for clinical use. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2075-4418 |