Glutathione gel-encapsulated niosomal delivery system versus glutathione gel only in treatment of melasma: a comparative study

Background Glutathione is an antioxidant agent used in the treatment of melasma. However, niosome is a drug delivery enhancer used in other skin diseases to increase the absorption of any active ingredient. Objective To assess the efficacy of niosome with topical glutathione gel 2% in the treatment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eman S. Abdel-Azim, Usama F. Aly, Heba O. Dakhly, Mahmoud H.A. Montaser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of the Egyptian Women’s Dermatologic Society
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jewd.jewd_43_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841560286006345728
author Eman S. Abdel-Azim
Usama F. Aly
Heba O. Dakhly
Mahmoud H.A. Montaser
author_facet Eman S. Abdel-Azim
Usama F. Aly
Heba O. Dakhly
Mahmoud H.A. Montaser
author_sort Eman S. Abdel-Azim
collection DOAJ
description Background Glutathione is an antioxidant agent used in the treatment of melasma. However, niosome is a drug delivery enhancer used in other skin diseases to increase the absorption of any active ingredient. Objective To assess the efficacy of niosome with topical glutathione gel 2% in the treatment of melasma versus topical glutathione gel 2% alone. Patients and methods In this comparative study, 19 patients complaining of melasma were divided into two groups. Group 1 was treated with glutathione gel 2% only, while group 2 was treated with glutathione gel 2% encapsulated in niosome. The split face method was used where right side of face for treatment and left side for placebo. Patients were photographed and examined clinically by Wood’s light and dermoscopy. All patients were evaluated clinically using a modified Hemi-Melasma Area and Severity Index (HEMI-MASI) score with the calculation of the reduction percentage and grading of the improvement. Moreover, histopathological examination was done before and after treatment. Results In Glutathione treated right side, hemi-MASI score after treatment was decreased with no significant difference when compared with base line; while in Glutathione gel with niosome treated right side; hemi-MASI score was significantly decreased. There was a high significant difference in reduction percentage of hemi-MASI score of both right sides of face of the two groups. No side effects were reported by patients of both groups. After treatment, both H and E and FM sections showed a decrease in basal hyperpigmentation in the case of epidermal melasma and a decrease in dermal melanophages in mixed melasma in both groups. Conclusion Topical glutathione gel alone without niosome is a weak melasma treatment. Niosome enhances glutathione gel absorption and efficacy without any side effects.
format Article
id doaj-art-96b2ddf7d89944748d1a6d9905a70a21
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-2565
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of the Egyptian Women’s Dermatologic Society
spelling doaj-art-96b2ddf7d89944748d1a6d9905a70a212025-01-04T14:14:29ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of the Egyptian Women’s Dermatologic Society2090-25652024-01-01211364310.4103/jewd.jewd_43_23Glutathione gel-encapsulated niosomal delivery system versus glutathione gel only in treatment of melasma: a comparative studyEman S. Abdel-AzimUsama F. AlyHeba O. DakhlyMahmoud H.A. MontaserBackground Glutathione is an antioxidant agent used in the treatment of melasma. However, niosome is a drug delivery enhancer used in other skin diseases to increase the absorption of any active ingredient. Objective To assess the efficacy of niosome with topical glutathione gel 2% in the treatment of melasma versus topical glutathione gel 2% alone. Patients and methods In this comparative study, 19 patients complaining of melasma were divided into two groups. Group 1 was treated with glutathione gel 2% only, while group 2 was treated with glutathione gel 2% encapsulated in niosome. The split face method was used where right side of face for treatment and left side for placebo. Patients were photographed and examined clinically by Wood’s light and dermoscopy. All patients were evaluated clinically using a modified Hemi-Melasma Area and Severity Index (HEMI-MASI) score with the calculation of the reduction percentage and grading of the improvement. Moreover, histopathological examination was done before and after treatment. Results In Glutathione treated right side, hemi-MASI score after treatment was decreased with no significant difference when compared with base line; while in Glutathione gel with niosome treated right side; hemi-MASI score was significantly decreased. There was a high significant difference in reduction percentage of hemi-MASI score of both right sides of face of the two groups. No side effects were reported by patients of both groups. After treatment, both H and E and FM sections showed a decrease in basal hyperpigmentation in the case of epidermal melasma and a decrease in dermal melanophages in mixed melasma in both groups. Conclusion Topical glutathione gel alone without niosome is a weak melasma treatment. Niosome enhances glutathione gel absorption and efficacy without any side effects.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jewd.jewd_43_23glutathionehyperpigmentationmelasmaniosome
spellingShingle Eman S. Abdel-Azim
Usama F. Aly
Heba O. Dakhly
Mahmoud H.A. Montaser
Glutathione gel-encapsulated niosomal delivery system versus glutathione gel only in treatment of melasma: a comparative study
Journal of the Egyptian Women’s Dermatologic Society
glutathione
hyperpigmentation
melasma
niosome
title Glutathione gel-encapsulated niosomal delivery system versus glutathione gel only in treatment of melasma: a comparative study
title_full Glutathione gel-encapsulated niosomal delivery system versus glutathione gel only in treatment of melasma: a comparative study
title_fullStr Glutathione gel-encapsulated niosomal delivery system versus glutathione gel only in treatment of melasma: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Glutathione gel-encapsulated niosomal delivery system versus glutathione gel only in treatment of melasma: a comparative study
title_short Glutathione gel-encapsulated niosomal delivery system versus glutathione gel only in treatment of melasma: a comparative study
title_sort glutathione gel encapsulated niosomal delivery system versus glutathione gel only in treatment of melasma a comparative study
topic glutathione
hyperpigmentation
melasma
niosome
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jewd.jewd_43_23
work_keys_str_mv AT emansabdelazim glutathionegelencapsulatedniosomaldeliverysystemversusglutathionegelonlyintreatmentofmelasmaacomparativestudy
AT usamafaly glutathionegelencapsulatedniosomaldeliverysystemversusglutathionegelonlyintreatmentofmelasmaacomparativestudy
AT hebaodakhly glutathionegelencapsulatedniosomaldeliverysystemversusglutathionegelonlyintreatmentofmelasmaacomparativestudy
AT mahmoudhamontaser glutathionegelencapsulatedniosomaldeliverysystemversusglutathionegelonlyintreatmentofmelasmaacomparativestudy