When AI goes wrong: Fatal errors in oncological research reviewing assistance Open AI based
In this letter to the editor, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, specifically the Chat-GPT based “Review Assistant” by Elsevier, for reviewing scientific articles is discussed. While the tool has many benefits such as detecting linguistic and typographical errors in manuscripts, it...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Marwan Al-Raeei |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2024-06-01
|
Series: | Oral Oncology Reports |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772906024001389 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The application of ChatGPT in the peer-reviewing process
by: Vini Mehta, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01) -
Who Owns AI?
by: Amy Whitaker
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Educational frontiers with ChatGPT: a social network analysis of influential tweets
by: Mehmet Firat, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01) -
Integrating AI in college education: Positive yet mixed experiences with ChatGPT
by: Xinrui Song, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Pilot Study on AI Image Analysis for Lower-Limb Reconstruction—Assessing ChatGPT-4’s Recommendations in Comparison to Board-Certified Plastic Surgeons and Resident Physicians
by: Silke Graul, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)