Generalized Predictive Control for a Single-Phase, Three-Level Voltage Source Inverter
In recent years, the study of model predictive control (MPC) in power electronics has gained significant attention due to its ability to optimize system performance and improve the dynamic control of complex power converters. There are two types of MPC: finite control set (FCS) and continuous contro...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Energies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/10/2541 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In recent years, the study of model predictive control (MPC) in power electronics has gained significant attention due to its ability to optimize system performance and improve the dynamic control of complex power converters. There are two types of MPC: finite control set (FCS) and continuous control set (CCS). The FCS–MPC has been studied more in regard to these two types of control due to its easy and intuitive implementation. However, FCS–MPC has some drawbacks, such as the exponential growth of the computational burden as the prediction horizon increases and, in some cases, a variable frequency. In contrast, generalized predictive control (GPC), part of CCS–MPC, offers significant advantages. It enables the use of a longer prediction horizon without increasing the computational burden in regard to its implementation, which has practical implications for the efficiency and performance of power converters. This paper presents the design of GPC applied to single-phase multilevel voltage source inverters, highlighting its advantages over FCS–MPC. The controller is optimized offline, significantly reducing the computational cost of implementation. Moreover, the controller is tested in regard to R, RL, and nonlinear loads. Finally, the validation results using a medium-performance controller and a Hardware-in-the-Loop device highlight the improved behavior of the proposed GPC, maintaining a harmonic distortion of less than 1.2% for R and RL loads. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1996-1073 |