Safety and efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with acute venous thromboembolism postthrombolytic therapy as compared to unfractionated heparin: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is a proven treatment for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) with a lower risk of VTE recurrence and lower rates of major hemorrhage compared to unfractionated heparin (UFH) and have largely replaced its use in many indications, but its use aro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eman M. Mansory, Maha S. Al-Kathiry, Abdulelah Alzahrani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-12-01
Series:Iraqi Journal of Hematology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijh.ijh_24_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841551999855755264
author Eman M. Mansory
Maha S. Al-Kathiry
Abdulelah Alzahrani
author_facet Eman M. Mansory
Maha S. Al-Kathiry
Abdulelah Alzahrani
author_sort Eman M. Mansory
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is a proven treatment for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) with a lower risk of VTE recurrence and lower rates of major hemorrhage compared to unfractionated heparin (UFH) and have largely replaced its use in many indications, but its use around thrombolysis remains controversial. AIM: This study aims to evaluate the currently available evidence on LMWH use in postthrombolysis as compared to UFH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Embase and MEDLINE were searched between 1992 and 2022, in addition to other sources. We included experimental and observational studies that assessed the use of LMWH as compared to UFH in patients with massive and submissive pulmonary embolism (PE) in the acute postthrombolysis phase. Data were pooled to estimate odds ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence intervals for VTE recurrence, bleeding complications and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Three studies were included in this systematic review: one randomized controlled trial, one prospective, and one retrospective study. A total of 299 patients were treated with UFH, and 227 patients were treated with LMWH. Patients treated with LMWH had a statistically significant lower risk of major bleeding with OR 0.41 (0.17, 0.97) P = 0.04 and 30-day mortality with OR 0.44 (0.23, 0.85) P = 0.01. On the other hand, though the risk of VTE recurrence and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) were lower, this was not statistically significant with OR of 0.18 (0.03, 1.07) P = 0.06 for VTE recurrence, and OR of 0.75 (0.39, 1.42) P = 0.38 for CRNMB. CONCLUSION: In patients with massive and submissive PE postthrombolysis, LMWH is a reasonable option for anticoagulation with lower risk of VTE recurrence, bleeding complications and 30-day mortality when compared to UFH. However, this conclusion is largely influenced by observational data and the very limited evidence available. Certainly, more studies are needed to evaluate this clinical question.
format Article
id doaj-art-95533c63421a4b5fbcc431b3872adb82
institution Kabale University
issn 2072-8069
2543-2702
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Iraqi Journal of Hematology
spelling doaj-art-95533c63421a4b5fbcc431b3872adb822025-01-09T13:54:00ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIraqi Journal of Hematology2072-80692543-27022024-12-0113223825010.4103/ijh.ijh_24_24Safety and efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with acute venous thromboembolism postthrombolytic therapy as compared to unfractionated heparin: A systematic review and meta-analysisEman M. MansoryMaha S. Al-KathiryAbdulelah AlzahraniBACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is a proven treatment for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) with a lower risk of VTE recurrence and lower rates of major hemorrhage compared to unfractionated heparin (UFH) and have largely replaced its use in many indications, but its use around thrombolysis remains controversial. AIM: This study aims to evaluate the currently available evidence on LMWH use in postthrombolysis as compared to UFH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Embase and MEDLINE were searched between 1992 and 2022, in addition to other sources. We included experimental and observational studies that assessed the use of LMWH as compared to UFH in patients with massive and submissive pulmonary embolism (PE) in the acute postthrombolysis phase. Data were pooled to estimate odds ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence intervals for VTE recurrence, bleeding complications and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Three studies were included in this systematic review: one randomized controlled trial, one prospective, and one retrospective study. A total of 299 patients were treated with UFH, and 227 patients were treated with LMWH. Patients treated with LMWH had a statistically significant lower risk of major bleeding with OR 0.41 (0.17, 0.97) P = 0.04 and 30-day mortality with OR 0.44 (0.23, 0.85) P = 0.01. On the other hand, though the risk of VTE recurrence and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) were lower, this was not statistically significant with OR of 0.18 (0.03, 1.07) P = 0.06 for VTE recurrence, and OR of 0.75 (0.39, 1.42) P = 0.38 for CRNMB. CONCLUSION: In patients with massive and submissive PE postthrombolysis, LMWH is a reasonable option for anticoagulation with lower risk of VTE recurrence, bleeding complications and 30-day mortality when compared to UFH. However, this conclusion is largely influenced by observational data and the very limited evidence available. Certainly, more studies are needed to evaluate this clinical question.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijh.ijh_24_24anticoagulationlow-molecular-weight heparinmassive pulmonary embolismpostthrombolysis
spellingShingle Eman M. Mansory
Maha S. Al-Kathiry
Abdulelah Alzahrani
Safety and efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with acute venous thromboembolism postthrombolytic therapy as compared to unfractionated heparin: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Iraqi Journal of Hematology
anticoagulation
low-molecular-weight heparin
massive pulmonary embolism
postthrombolysis
title Safety and efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with acute venous thromboembolism postthrombolytic therapy as compared to unfractionated heparin: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Safety and efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with acute venous thromboembolism postthrombolytic therapy as compared to unfractionated heparin: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with acute venous thromboembolism postthrombolytic therapy as compared to unfractionated heparin: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with acute venous thromboembolism postthrombolytic therapy as compared to unfractionated heparin: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Safety and efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with acute venous thromboembolism postthrombolytic therapy as compared to unfractionated heparin: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort safety and efficacy of low molecular weight heparin in patients with acute venous thromboembolism postthrombolytic therapy as compared to unfractionated heparin a systematic review and meta analysis
topic anticoagulation
low-molecular-weight heparin
massive pulmonary embolism
postthrombolysis
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijh.ijh_24_24
work_keys_str_mv AT emanmmansory safetyandefficacyoflowmolecularweightheparininpatientswithacutevenousthromboembolismpostthrombolytictherapyascomparedtounfractionatedheparinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mahasalkathiry safetyandefficacyoflowmolecularweightheparininpatientswithacutevenousthromboembolismpostthrombolytictherapyascomparedtounfractionatedheparinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT abdulelahalzahrani safetyandefficacyoflowmolecularweightheparininpatientswithacutevenousthromboembolismpostthrombolytictherapyascomparedtounfractionatedheparinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis