Comparison of Brachial Compression Versus Ulnar Compression on Radial Artery Diameter: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Conclusion: Ulnar compression and brachial compression maneuvers demonstrated effectiveness in inducing radial artery dilation for a limited duration. These maneuvers may reduce the occurrence of access failure during radial artery cannulation. No significant differences were observed between the tw...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2024-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Vascular Medicine |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/9965794 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Conclusion: Ulnar compression and brachial compression maneuvers demonstrated effectiveness in inducing radial artery dilation for a limited duration. These maneuvers may reduce the occurrence of access failure during radial artery cannulation. No significant differences were observed between the two maneuvers, indicating that they can be used interchangeably based on clinician preference. So, because the ulnar compression is simpler and more feasible for the patients, it can be considered instead of brachial compression. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2090-2832 |