One-Year Outcomes of Aflibercept in Treat-and-Extend Versus Pro Re Nata Regimens for Bevacizumab-Resistant Diabetic Macular Edema: A Real-World Study

Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen versus the pro re nata (PRN) regimen in patients with bevacizumab-resistant diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with aflibercept, with or without adjunctive laser therapy. Methods Ninety-on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zubeyir Yozgat, Mehmed Ugur Isik, Mehmet Cem Sabaner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Adis, Springer Healthcare 2024-11-01
Series:Ophthalmology and Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-024-01067-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544931702734848
author Zubeyir Yozgat
Mehmed Ugur Isik
Mehmet Cem Sabaner
author_facet Zubeyir Yozgat
Mehmed Ugur Isik
Mehmet Cem Sabaner
author_sort Zubeyir Yozgat
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen versus the pro re nata (PRN) regimen in patients with bevacizumab-resistant diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with aflibercept, with or without adjunctive laser therapy. Methods Ninety-one eyes from 91 patients who were switched to aflibercept after three consecutive intravitreal bevacizumab injections for the treatment of DME were included in this retrospective real-world study. The patients were categorized into three groups: TAE (n = 30), TAE + laser (n = 31), and PRN (n = 30). Changes in best-corrected visual acuity and central macular subfield thickness (CMST) at 12, 24, and 52 weeks were defined as the primary functional and anatomical outcomes. Results A total of 91 eyes from 91 patients (49.5% female) with a mean age of 63.9 ± 7.1 years were included in the analysis. At 52 weeks, the mean letter gains were 8.03, 8.90, and 10.23 in the TAE, TAE + laser, and PRN groups, respectively. Anatomical improvements, as measured by CMST reduction, were 55.33 µm, 33.35 µm, and 48.96 µm in the TAE, TAE + laser, and PRN groups, respectively. The average number of injections administered was 7.7, 8.1, and 8.1, respectively. The final extension interval for the TAE group was 8.7 weeks, compared to 9.5 weeks in the TAE + laser group. Conclusions The PRN group demonstrated the highest functional improvement while the TAE group showed the greatest anatomical improvement. Overall, both anatomical and functional outcomes in the TAE regimen were comparable to the PRN regimen in patients with bevacizumab-resistant diabetic macular edema.
format Article
id doaj-art-9515c2d0d32147649f26ab8f32941fea
institution Kabale University
issn 2193-8245
2193-6528
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Adis, Springer Healthcare
record_format Article
series Ophthalmology and Therapy
spelling doaj-art-9515c2d0d32147649f26ab8f32941fea2025-01-12T12:10:42ZengAdis, Springer HealthcareOphthalmology and Therapy2193-82452193-65282024-11-0114116918110.1007/s40123-024-01067-xOne-Year Outcomes of Aflibercept in Treat-and-Extend Versus Pro Re Nata Regimens for Bevacizumab-Resistant Diabetic Macular Edema: A Real-World StudyZubeyir Yozgat0Mehmed Ugur Isik1Mehmet Cem Sabaner2Retina Division, Department of Ophthalmology, Kastamonu Training and Research Hospital, Kastamonu UniversityRetina Division, Department of Ophthalmology, Kastamonu Training and Research Hospital, Kastamonu UniversityRetina Division, Department of Ophthalmology, Kastamonu Training and Research Hospital, Kastamonu UniversityAbstract Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen versus the pro re nata (PRN) regimen in patients with bevacizumab-resistant diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with aflibercept, with or without adjunctive laser therapy. Methods Ninety-one eyes from 91 patients who were switched to aflibercept after three consecutive intravitreal bevacizumab injections for the treatment of DME were included in this retrospective real-world study. The patients were categorized into three groups: TAE (n = 30), TAE + laser (n = 31), and PRN (n = 30). Changes in best-corrected visual acuity and central macular subfield thickness (CMST) at 12, 24, and 52 weeks were defined as the primary functional and anatomical outcomes. Results A total of 91 eyes from 91 patients (49.5% female) with a mean age of 63.9 ± 7.1 years were included in the analysis. At 52 weeks, the mean letter gains were 8.03, 8.90, and 10.23 in the TAE, TAE + laser, and PRN groups, respectively. Anatomical improvements, as measured by CMST reduction, were 55.33 µm, 33.35 µm, and 48.96 µm in the TAE, TAE + laser, and PRN groups, respectively. The average number of injections administered was 7.7, 8.1, and 8.1, respectively. The final extension interval for the TAE group was 8.7 weeks, compared to 9.5 weeks in the TAE + laser group. Conclusions The PRN group demonstrated the highest functional improvement while the TAE group showed the greatest anatomical improvement. Overall, both anatomical and functional outcomes in the TAE regimen were comparable to the PRN regimen in patients with bevacizumab-resistant diabetic macular edema.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-024-01067-xAfliberceptBevacizumab-resistantDiabetic macular edemaPro re nata regimenReal-world studyTreat-and-extend regimen
spellingShingle Zubeyir Yozgat
Mehmed Ugur Isik
Mehmet Cem Sabaner
One-Year Outcomes of Aflibercept in Treat-and-Extend Versus Pro Re Nata Regimens for Bevacizumab-Resistant Diabetic Macular Edema: A Real-World Study
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Aflibercept
Bevacizumab-resistant
Diabetic macular edema
Pro re nata regimen
Real-world study
Treat-and-extend regimen
title One-Year Outcomes of Aflibercept in Treat-and-Extend Versus Pro Re Nata Regimens for Bevacizumab-Resistant Diabetic Macular Edema: A Real-World Study
title_full One-Year Outcomes of Aflibercept in Treat-and-Extend Versus Pro Re Nata Regimens for Bevacizumab-Resistant Diabetic Macular Edema: A Real-World Study
title_fullStr One-Year Outcomes of Aflibercept in Treat-and-Extend Versus Pro Re Nata Regimens for Bevacizumab-Resistant Diabetic Macular Edema: A Real-World Study
title_full_unstemmed One-Year Outcomes of Aflibercept in Treat-and-Extend Versus Pro Re Nata Regimens for Bevacizumab-Resistant Diabetic Macular Edema: A Real-World Study
title_short One-Year Outcomes of Aflibercept in Treat-and-Extend Versus Pro Re Nata Regimens for Bevacizumab-Resistant Diabetic Macular Edema: A Real-World Study
title_sort one year outcomes of aflibercept in treat and extend versus pro re nata regimens for bevacizumab resistant diabetic macular edema a real world study
topic Aflibercept
Bevacizumab-resistant
Diabetic macular edema
Pro re nata regimen
Real-world study
Treat-and-extend regimen
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-024-01067-x
work_keys_str_mv AT zubeyiryozgat oneyearoutcomesofafliberceptintreatandextendversusprorenataregimensforbevacizumabresistantdiabeticmacularedemaarealworldstudy
AT mehmedugurisik oneyearoutcomesofafliberceptintreatandextendversusprorenataregimensforbevacizumabresistantdiabeticmacularedemaarealworldstudy
AT mehmetcemsabaner oneyearoutcomesofafliberceptintreatandextendversusprorenataregimensforbevacizumabresistantdiabeticmacularedemaarealworldstudy