Comparative assessment of difficulty scales for removal of the third molar of the lower jaw depending on its position

Retention (delayed eruption) of the third molar is one of the most common pathologies in the outpatient practice of a dentist-surgeon. Such a pathology can very often be complicated by inflammatory diseases, such as pericoronitis, periostitis and other more serious diseases. Therefore, early warning...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: O.O. Gudarian, Zh.M. Nekhanevуch, T.O. Kycherenko, A.V. Shepelya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dnipro State Medical University 2024-06-01
Series:Medičnì Perspektivi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uran.ua/index.php/2307-0404/article/view/307467
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841561277659348992
author O.O. Gudarian
Zh.M. Nekhanevуch
T.O. Kycherenko
A.V. Shepelya
author_facet O.O. Gudarian
Zh.M. Nekhanevуch
T.O. Kycherenko
A.V. Shepelya
author_sort O.O. Gudarian
collection DOAJ
description Retention (delayed eruption) of the third molar is one of the most common pathologies in the outpatient practice of a dentist-surgeon. Such a pathology can very often be complicated by inflammatory diseases, such as pericoronitis, periostitis and other more serious diseases. Therefore, early warning and most gentle removal of the causative tooth determines the professionalism of the dental surgeon. A large number of indexes of difficulty of removal of the third molar have been proposed by different authors, but none of them is considered universal and optimal for different clinical cases. The level of complexity is most clearly characterized by a scale that takes into account not only radiological but also clinical and demographic indicators. Such scales exist in modification or in more recent literary sources. Having chosen the most clear and correct scale, it is possible for the surgeon to clearly assess the entire level of complexity and responsibility for surgical intervention on removing the third molar, thereby obtaining the most effective result, minimizing complications both during the operation and after a while. The purpose of the study: justification of the selection of the difficulty rating scale for the removal of the third molar of the lower jaw, depending on its position. The study analyzed and compared 18 basic scales of complexity that are most often used by surgeons before removing the impacted third molar of the lower jaw. Data sources that were used for the search were taken from Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar, Minerva library databases. Each of the difficulty scales was presented and translated into Ukrainian for convenient use in the practice of a dental surgeon. A general table was provided where a comparative analysis of the difficulty scales was made according to thirty parameters. It is shown that the Cosme Gay-Escoda C. scale has the most indicators for preoperative assessment of complexity. There are many difficulty scales for preoperative assessment for the removal of impacted third molars of the lower jaw. Some of them have radiological evaluation criteria, some have clinical criteria, and only the Pernumbuco index (2017), Zhang X. (2019), and Cosme Gay-Escoda C. (2022) scales also have demographic indicators. However, the latter has the largest number of criteria, according to which the difficulty of removing the third molar of the lower jaw is calculated.
format Article
id doaj-art-94ba89bb00dd46e980b054c450253775
institution Kabale University
issn 2307-0404
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Dnipro State Medical University
record_format Article
series Medičnì Perspektivi
spelling doaj-art-94ba89bb00dd46e980b054c4502537752025-01-03T01:51:33ZengDnipro State Medical UniversityMedičnì Perspektivi2307-04042024-06-01292274210.26641/2307-0404.2024.2.307467345928Comparative assessment of difficulty scales for removal of the third molar of the lower jaw depending on its positionO.O. Gudarian0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5370-1570Zh.M. Nekhanevуch1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2368-9579T.O. Kycherenko2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6513-4662A.V. Shepelya3https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3591-3429Dnipro State Medical University, Volodymyra Vernadskoho str., 9, Dnipro, 49044Dnipro State Medical University, Volodymyra Vernadskoho str., 9, Dnipro, 49044Dnipro State Medical University, Volodymyra Vernadskoho str., 9, Dnipro, 49044Dnipro State Medical University, Volodymyra Vernadskoho str., 9, Dnipro, 49044Retention (delayed eruption) of the third molar is one of the most common pathologies in the outpatient practice of a dentist-surgeon. Such a pathology can very often be complicated by inflammatory diseases, such as pericoronitis, periostitis and other more serious diseases. Therefore, early warning and most gentle removal of the causative tooth determines the professionalism of the dental surgeon. A large number of indexes of difficulty of removal of the third molar have been proposed by different authors, but none of them is considered universal and optimal for different clinical cases. The level of complexity is most clearly characterized by a scale that takes into account not only radiological but also clinical and demographic indicators. Such scales exist in modification or in more recent literary sources. Having chosen the most clear and correct scale, it is possible for the surgeon to clearly assess the entire level of complexity and responsibility for surgical intervention on removing the third molar, thereby obtaining the most effective result, minimizing complications both during the operation and after a while. The purpose of the study: justification of the selection of the difficulty rating scale for the removal of the third molar of the lower jaw, depending on its position. The study analyzed and compared 18 basic scales of complexity that are most often used by surgeons before removing the impacted third molar of the lower jaw. Data sources that were used for the search were taken from Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar, Minerva library databases. Each of the difficulty scales was presented and translated into Ukrainian for convenient use in the practice of a dental surgeon. A general table was provided where a comparative analysis of the difficulty scales was made according to thirty parameters. It is shown that the Cosme Gay-Escoda C. scale has the most indicators for preoperative assessment of complexity. There are many difficulty scales for preoperative assessment for the removal of impacted third molars of the lower jaw. Some of them have radiological evaluation criteria, some have clinical criteria, and only the Pernumbuco index (2017), Zhang X. (2019), and Cosme Gay-Escoda C. (2022) scales also have demographic indicators. However, the latter has the largest number of criteria, according to which the difficulty of removing the third molar of the lower jaw is calculated.https://journals.uran.ua/index.php/2307-0404/article/view/307467impacted third molarimpactionatypical removalcomplications
spellingShingle O.O. Gudarian
Zh.M. Nekhanevуch
T.O. Kycherenko
A.V. Shepelya
Comparative assessment of difficulty scales for removal of the third molar of the lower jaw depending on its position
Medičnì Perspektivi
impacted third molar
impaction
atypical removal
complications
title Comparative assessment of difficulty scales for removal of the third molar of the lower jaw depending on its position
title_full Comparative assessment of difficulty scales for removal of the third molar of the lower jaw depending on its position
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of difficulty scales for removal of the third molar of the lower jaw depending on its position
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of difficulty scales for removal of the third molar of the lower jaw depending on its position
title_short Comparative assessment of difficulty scales for removal of the third molar of the lower jaw depending on its position
title_sort comparative assessment of difficulty scales for removal of the third molar of the lower jaw depending on its position
topic impacted third molar
impaction
atypical removal
complications
url https://journals.uran.ua/index.php/2307-0404/article/view/307467
work_keys_str_mv AT oogudarian comparativeassessmentofdifficultyscalesforremovalofthethirdmolarofthelowerjawdependingonitsposition
AT zhmnekhanevuch comparativeassessmentofdifficultyscalesforremovalofthethirdmolarofthelowerjawdependingonitsposition
AT tokycherenko comparativeassessmentofdifficultyscalesforremovalofthethirdmolarofthelowerjawdependingonitsposition
AT avshepelya comparativeassessmentofdifficultyscalesforremovalofthethirdmolarofthelowerjawdependingonitsposition