Safety profile of belatacept in a real-life setting: disproportionality analysis of the WHO pharmacovigilance database

Abstract Background Belatacept is a co-stimulation blocker used in kidney transplant recipients to prevent allograft rejection. Unlike calcineurin inhibitors, belatacept is non-nephrotoxic and may carry a lower risk of cardiovascular and metabolic complications. However, the European Medicines Agenc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandre O. Gérard, Diane Merino, Nouha Ben Othman, Alexandre Destere, Delphine Viard, Elliot Ewig, Fanny Rocher, Antoine Sicard, Milou-Daniel Drici
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-08-01
Series:BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-025-00972-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849341665055080448
author Alexandre O. Gérard
Diane Merino
Nouha Ben Othman
Alexandre Destere
Delphine Viard
Elliot Ewig
Fanny Rocher
Antoine Sicard
Milou-Daniel Drici
author_facet Alexandre O. Gérard
Diane Merino
Nouha Ben Othman
Alexandre Destere
Delphine Viard
Elliot Ewig
Fanny Rocher
Antoine Sicard
Milou-Daniel Drici
author_sort Alexandre O. Gérard
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Belatacept is a co-stimulation blocker used in kidney transplant recipients to prevent allograft rejection. Unlike calcineurin inhibitors, belatacept is non-nephrotoxic and may carry a lower risk of cardiovascular and metabolic complications. However, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) includes a broad range of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), mostly identified in small clinical trials with cyclosporine as a control, in patients exposed to other immunosuppressants. As real-world data on belatacept safety accumulate, a reassessment of its safety profile becomes essential. Methods We analyzed pharmacovigilance data from VigiBase®, the World Health Organization global safety database, to explore discrepancies between postmarketing ADR reports and the belatacept Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). A disproportionality analysis was performed using the Information Component, a Bayesian metric, to identify potential pharmacovigilance signals. Results We retrieved 2795 reports involving belatacept, including 424 (15.2%) fatal cases. The disproportionality analysis highlighted 51 potential signals that were not explicitly listed in the SmPC, such as Clostridium difficile infection, hepatitis B reactivation, and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Conversely, 47 (33.1%) of the 142 ADRs classified as “common” or “very common” in the SmPC, such as Cushing’s syndrome or depression, had fewer than three reports in VigiBase®. Conclusions This study highlights discrepancies between the belatacept SmPC and real-world pharmacovigilance data. Several labeled ADRs were not reported frequently in VigiBase®, suggesting that they may be less commonly observed in real-world settings. Others, particularly infections, warrant further scrutiny. Yet, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the inherent limitations of pharmacovigilance data, including underreporting, reporting bias, and residual confounding. Pharmacovigilance approaches generate signals, but cannot definitively establish or exclude a causal relationship. Nonetheless, these findings suggest the need for periodic reassessment of belatacept’s safety profile to ensure accurate and clinically relevant information for healthcare providers.
format Article
id doaj-art-935e7a6ce87746c4af8d9ebb00bcc6a6
institution Kabale University
issn 2050-6511
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
spelling doaj-art-935e7a6ce87746c4af8d9ebb00bcc6a62025-08-20T03:43:34ZengBMCBMC Pharmacology and Toxicology2050-65112025-08-012611910.1186/s40360-025-00972-6Safety profile of belatacept in a real-life setting: disproportionality analysis of the WHO pharmacovigilance databaseAlexandre O. Gérard0Diane Merino1Nouha Ben Othman2Alexandre Destere3Delphine Viard4Elliot Ewig5Fanny Rocher6Antoine Sicard7Milou-Daniel Drici8Department of Nephrology-Dialysis-Transplantation, Université Côte d’Azur, University Hospital Centre of NiceDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Université Côte d’Azur, University Hospital Centre of NiceDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Université Côte d’Azur, University Hospital Centre of NiceDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Université Côte d’Azur, University Hospital Centre of NiceDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Université Côte d’Azur, University Hospital Centre of NiceDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Université Côte d’Azur, University Hospital Centre of NiceDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Université Côte d’Azur, University Hospital Centre of NiceDepartment of Nephrology-Dialysis-Transplantation, Université Côte d’Azur, University Hospital Centre of NiceDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Université Côte d’Azur, University Hospital Centre of NiceAbstract Background Belatacept is a co-stimulation blocker used in kidney transplant recipients to prevent allograft rejection. Unlike calcineurin inhibitors, belatacept is non-nephrotoxic and may carry a lower risk of cardiovascular and metabolic complications. However, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) includes a broad range of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), mostly identified in small clinical trials with cyclosporine as a control, in patients exposed to other immunosuppressants. As real-world data on belatacept safety accumulate, a reassessment of its safety profile becomes essential. Methods We analyzed pharmacovigilance data from VigiBase®, the World Health Organization global safety database, to explore discrepancies between postmarketing ADR reports and the belatacept Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). A disproportionality analysis was performed using the Information Component, a Bayesian metric, to identify potential pharmacovigilance signals. Results We retrieved 2795 reports involving belatacept, including 424 (15.2%) fatal cases. The disproportionality analysis highlighted 51 potential signals that were not explicitly listed in the SmPC, such as Clostridium difficile infection, hepatitis B reactivation, and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Conversely, 47 (33.1%) of the 142 ADRs classified as “common” or “very common” in the SmPC, such as Cushing’s syndrome or depression, had fewer than three reports in VigiBase®. Conclusions This study highlights discrepancies between the belatacept SmPC and real-world pharmacovigilance data. Several labeled ADRs were not reported frequently in VigiBase®, suggesting that they may be less commonly observed in real-world settings. Others, particularly infections, warrant further scrutiny. Yet, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the inherent limitations of pharmacovigilance data, including underreporting, reporting bias, and residual confounding. Pharmacovigilance approaches generate signals, but cannot definitively establish or exclude a causal relationship. Nonetheless, these findings suggest the need for periodic reassessment of belatacept’s safety profile to ensure accurate and clinically relevant information for healthcare providers.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-025-00972-6BelataceptTransplantationImmunosuppressionAdverse drug reactionsPharmacovigilance
spellingShingle Alexandre O. Gérard
Diane Merino
Nouha Ben Othman
Alexandre Destere
Delphine Viard
Elliot Ewig
Fanny Rocher
Antoine Sicard
Milou-Daniel Drici
Safety profile of belatacept in a real-life setting: disproportionality analysis of the WHO pharmacovigilance database
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Belatacept
Transplantation
Immunosuppression
Adverse drug reactions
Pharmacovigilance
title Safety profile of belatacept in a real-life setting: disproportionality analysis of the WHO pharmacovigilance database
title_full Safety profile of belatacept in a real-life setting: disproportionality analysis of the WHO pharmacovigilance database
title_fullStr Safety profile of belatacept in a real-life setting: disproportionality analysis of the WHO pharmacovigilance database
title_full_unstemmed Safety profile of belatacept in a real-life setting: disproportionality analysis of the WHO pharmacovigilance database
title_short Safety profile of belatacept in a real-life setting: disproportionality analysis of the WHO pharmacovigilance database
title_sort safety profile of belatacept in a real life setting disproportionality analysis of the who pharmacovigilance database
topic Belatacept
Transplantation
Immunosuppression
Adverse drug reactions
Pharmacovigilance
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-025-00972-6
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandreogerard safetyprofileofbelataceptinareallifesettingdisproportionalityanalysisofthewhopharmacovigilancedatabase
AT dianemerino safetyprofileofbelataceptinareallifesettingdisproportionalityanalysisofthewhopharmacovigilancedatabase
AT nouhabenothman safetyprofileofbelataceptinareallifesettingdisproportionalityanalysisofthewhopharmacovigilancedatabase
AT alexandredestere safetyprofileofbelataceptinareallifesettingdisproportionalityanalysisofthewhopharmacovigilancedatabase
AT delphineviard safetyprofileofbelataceptinareallifesettingdisproportionalityanalysisofthewhopharmacovigilancedatabase
AT elliotewig safetyprofileofbelataceptinareallifesettingdisproportionalityanalysisofthewhopharmacovigilancedatabase
AT fannyrocher safetyprofileofbelataceptinareallifesettingdisproportionalityanalysisofthewhopharmacovigilancedatabase
AT antoinesicard safetyprofileofbelataceptinareallifesettingdisproportionalityanalysisofthewhopharmacovigilancedatabase
AT miloudanieldrici safetyprofileofbelataceptinareallifesettingdisproportionalityanalysisofthewhopharmacovigilancedatabase