Simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: Report of 7 cases

Introduction: The goal in treating Hemifacial microsomia (HFM) is to improve facial symmetry, allow functional jaw movement, obtain stable occlusion, and achieve patient satisfaction. This study was planned with an aim to assess the outcome of simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction osteogenesis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Divya Mehrotra, Debraj Howladar, Dichen P. Bhutia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-05-01
Series:Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426817300696
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846159688520957952
author Divya Mehrotra
Debraj Howladar
Dichen P. Bhutia
author_facet Divya Mehrotra
Debraj Howladar
Dichen P. Bhutia
author_sort Divya Mehrotra
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The goal in treating Hemifacial microsomia (HFM) is to improve facial symmetry, allow functional jaw movement, obtain stable occlusion, and achieve patient satisfaction. This study was planned with an aim to assess the outcome of simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia. Material & methods: Seven patients with hemifacial microsomia were included in this study and demographic data was obtained. Simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction was planned for correction of maxillary cant, vertical ramal lengthening and midline, by performing unilateral mandibular osteotomy in ramus and distractor fixation, a Le Fort I osteotomy, with fixation at contralateral zygomatic buttress and intermaxillary elastics. Derriford Appearance Scale was used to measure individual responses to address problems of appearance. Results: 6 males and 1 female, with age range 18–26 years, mean 22.14 were included in the study. Maxillary occlusal cant varied from 4–16°, mean 9.85° and distraction achieved ranged from 12–19 mm, mean 15.57. Preoperatively DAS score ranged from 42–61, mean 51.7 and improved to 10–27, mean 18.4. 100% success was achieved in 5 cases, while other two showed 96% and 99% success. Conclusion: Simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction osteogenesis improves facial esthetics and obviates the need for postoperative orthodontics, minimizing the treatment period.
format Article
id doaj-art-924c3a35a3b84c6bafac4bd00534450c
institution Kabale University
issn 2212-4268
language English
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
spelling doaj-art-924c3a35a3b84c6bafac4bd00534450c2024-11-23T06:27:22ZengElsevierJournal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research2212-42682017-05-0172147152Simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: Report of 7 casesDivya Mehrotra0Debraj Howladar1Dichen P. Bhutia2Corresponding author.; Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaIntroduction: The goal in treating Hemifacial microsomia (HFM) is to improve facial symmetry, allow functional jaw movement, obtain stable occlusion, and achieve patient satisfaction. This study was planned with an aim to assess the outcome of simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia. Material & methods: Seven patients with hemifacial microsomia were included in this study and demographic data was obtained. Simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction was planned for correction of maxillary cant, vertical ramal lengthening and midline, by performing unilateral mandibular osteotomy in ramus and distractor fixation, a Le Fort I osteotomy, with fixation at contralateral zygomatic buttress and intermaxillary elastics. Derriford Appearance Scale was used to measure individual responses to address problems of appearance. Results: 6 males and 1 female, with age range 18–26 years, mean 22.14 were included in the study. Maxillary occlusal cant varied from 4–16°, mean 9.85° and distraction achieved ranged from 12–19 mm, mean 15.57. Preoperatively DAS score ranged from 42–61, mean 51.7 and improved to 10–27, mean 18.4. 100% success was achieved in 5 cases, while other two showed 96% and 99% success. Conclusion: Simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction osteogenesis improves facial esthetics and obviates the need for postoperative orthodontics, minimizing the treatment period.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426817300696Hemifacial microsomiaSimultaneous maxilla mandibular distraction
spellingShingle Divya Mehrotra
Debraj Howladar
Dichen P. Bhutia
Simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: Report of 7 cases
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
Hemifacial microsomia
Simultaneous maxilla mandibular distraction
title Simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: Report of 7 cases
title_full Simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: Report of 7 cases
title_fullStr Simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: Report of 7 cases
title_full_unstemmed Simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: Report of 7 cases
title_short Simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: Report of 7 cases
title_sort simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia report of 7 cases
topic Hemifacial microsomia
Simultaneous maxilla mandibular distraction
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426817300696
work_keys_str_mv AT divyamehrotra simultaneousmaxillomandibulardistractionosteogenesisinhemifacialmicrosomiareportof7cases
AT debrajhowladar simultaneousmaxillomandibulardistractionosteogenesisinhemifacialmicrosomiareportof7cases
AT dichenpbhutia simultaneousmaxillomandibulardistractionosteogenesisinhemifacialmicrosomiareportof7cases