Stakeholder engagement in economic evaluation: Protocol for using the nominal group technique to elicit patient, healthcare provider, and health system stakeholder input in the development of an early economic evaluation model of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

Introduction Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is a class of immunotherapy. An economic evaluation conducted at an early stage of development of CAR-T therapy for treatment of adult relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia could provide insight into factors contributing to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dean A Fergusson, Manoj M Lalu, Ian D Graham, Justin Presseau, Kednapa Thavorn, Kelvin KW Chan, Daniel A Ollendorf, Natasha Kekre, Terry Hawrysh, Harold Atkins, Doug Coyle, Mackenzie Wilson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/8/e046707.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846133553890328576
author Dean A Fergusson
Manoj M Lalu
Ian D Graham
Justin Presseau
Kednapa Thavorn
Kelvin KW Chan
Daniel A Ollendorf
Natasha Kekre
Terry Hawrysh
Harold Atkins
Doug Coyle
Mackenzie Wilson
author_facet Dean A Fergusson
Manoj M Lalu
Ian D Graham
Justin Presseau
Kednapa Thavorn
Kelvin KW Chan
Daniel A Ollendorf
Natasha Kekre
Terry Hawrysh
Harold Atkins
Doug Coyle
Mackenzie Wilson
author_sort Dean A Fergusson
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is a class of immunotherapy. An economic evaluation conducted at an early stage of development of CAR-T therapy for treatment of adult relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia could provide insight into factors contributing to the cost of treatment, the potential clinical benefits, and what the health system can afford. Traditionally, stakeholders are engaged in certain parts of health technology assessment processes, such as in the identification and selection of technologies, formulation of recommendations, and implementation of recommendations; however, little is known about processes for stakeholder engagement during the conduct of the assessment. This is especially the case for economic evaluations. Stakeholders, such as clinicians, policy-makers, patients, and their support networks, have insight into factors that can enhance the validity of an economic evaluation model. This research outlines a specific methodology for stakeholder engagement and represents an avenue to enhance health economic evaluations and support the use of these models to inform decision making for resource allocation. This protocol may inform a tailored framework for stakeholder engagement processes in future economic evaluation model development.Methods and analysis We will involve clinicians, healthcare researchers, payers, and policy-makers, as well as patients and their support networks in the conduct and verification of an early economic evaluation of a novel health technology to incorporate stakeholder-generated knowledge. Three stakeholder-specific focus groups will be conducted using an online adaptation of the nominal group technique to elicit considerations from each. This study will use CAR-T therapy for adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia as a basis for investigating broader stakeholder engagement processes.Ethics and dissemination This study received ethics approval from the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Research Ethics Board (REB 20200320-01HT) and the results will be shared via conference presentations, peer-reviewed publications, and ongoing stakeholder engagement.
format Article
id doaj-art-915e75e5d8294f2a8b074fbb15d2e62b
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-915e75e5d8294f2a8b074fbb15d2e62b2024-12-09T13:40:07ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-08-0111810.1136/bmjopen-2020-046707Stakeholder engagement in economic evaluation: Protocol for using the nominal group technique to elicit patient, healthcare provider, and health system stakeholder input in the development of an early economic evaluation model of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapyDean A Fergusson0Manoj M Lalu1Ian D Graham2Justin Presseau3Kednapa Thavorn4Kelvin KW Chan5Daniel A Ollendorf6Natasha Kekre7Terry Hawrysh8Harold Atkins9Doug Coyle10Mackenzie Wilson11Clinical Epidemiology Programme, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, CanadaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaSunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaCenter for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USADepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaPatient Partner, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaIntroduction Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is a class of immunotherapy. An economic evaluation conducted at an early stage of development of CAR-T therapy for treatment of adult relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia could provide insight into factors contributing to the cost of treatment, the potential clinical benefits, and what the health system can afford. Traditionally, stakeholders are engaged in certain parts of health technology assessment processes, such as in the identification and selection of technologies, formulation of recommendations, and implementation of recommendations; however, little is known about processes for stakeholder engagement during the conduct of the assessment. This is especially the case for economic evaluations. Stakeholders, such as clinicians, policy-makers, patients, and their support networks, have insight into factors that can enhance the validity of an economic evaluation model. This research outlines a specific methodology for stakeholder engagement and represents an avenue to enhance health economic evaluations and support the use of these models to inform decision making for resource allocation. This protocol may inform a tailored framework for stakeholder engagement processes in future economic evaluation model development.Methods and analysis We will involve clinicians, healthcare researchers, payers, and policy-makers, as well as patients and their support networks in the conduct and verification of an early economic evaluation of a novel health technology to incorporate stakeholder-generated knowledge. Three stakeholder-specific focus groups will be conducted using an online adaptation of the nominal group technique to elicit considerations from each. This study will use CAR-T therapy for adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia as a basis for investigating broader stakeholder engagement processes.Ethics and dissemination This study received ethics approval from the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Research Ethics Board (REB 20200320-01HT) and the results will be shared via conference presentations, peer-reviewed publications, and ongoing stakeholder engagement.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/8/e046707.full
spellingShingle Dean A Fergusson
Manoj M Lalu
Ian D Graham
Justin Presseau
Kednapa Thavorn
Kelvin KW Chan
Daniel A Ollendorf
Natasha Kekre
Terry Hawrysh
Harold Atkins
Doug Coyle
Mackenzie Wilson
Stakeholder engagement in economic evaluation: Protocol for using the nominal group technique to elicit patient, healthcare provider, and health system stakeholder input in the development of an early economic evaluation model of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy
BMJ Open
title Stakeholder engagement in economic evaluation: Protocol for using the nominal group technique to elicit patient, healthcare provider, and health system stakeholder input in the development of an early economic evaluation model of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy
title_full Stakeholder engagement in economic evaluation: Protocol for using the nominal group technique to elicit patient, healthcare provider, and health system stakeholder input in the development of an early economic evaluation model of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy
title_fullStr Stakeholder engagement in economic evaluation: Protocol for using the nominal group technique to elicit patient, healthcare provider, and health system stakeholder input in the development of an early economic evaluation model of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholder engagement in economic evaluation: Protocol for using the nominal group technique to elicit patient, healthcare provider, and health system stakeholder input in the development of an early economic evaluation model of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy
title_short Stakeholder engagement in economic evaluation: Protocol for using the nominal group technique to elicit patient, healthcare provider, and health system stakeholder input in the development of an early economic evaluation model of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy
title_sort stakeholder engagement in economic evaluation protocol for using the nominal group technique to elicit patient healthcare provider and health system stakeholder input in the development of an early economic evaluation model of chimeric antigen receptor t cell therapy
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/8/e046707.full
work_keys_str_mv AT deanafergusson stakeholderengagementineconomicevaluationprotocolforusingthenominalgrouptechniquetoelicitpatienthealthcareproviderandhealthsystemstakeholderinputinthedevelopmentofanearlyeconomicevaluationmodelofchimericantigenreceptortcelltherapy
AT manojmlalu stakeholderengagementineconomicevaluationprotocolforusingthenominalgrouptechniquetoelicitpatienthealthcareproviderandhealthsystemstakeholderinputinthedevelopmentofanearlyeconomicevaluationmodelofchimericantigenreceptortcelltherapy
AT iandgraham stakeholderengagementineconomicevaluationprotocolforusingthenominalgrouptechniquetoelicitpatienthealthcareproviderandhealthsystemstakeholderinputinthedevelopmentofanearlyeconomicevaluationmodelofchimericantigenreceptortcelltherapy
AT justinpresseau stakeholderengagementineconomicevaluationprotocolforusingthenominalgrouptechniquetoelicitpatienthealthcareproviderandhealthsystemstakeholderinputinthedevelopmentofanearlyeconomicevaluationmodelofchimericantigenreceptortcelltherapy
AT kednapathavorn stakeholderengagementineconomicevaluationprotocolforusingthenominalgrouptechniquetoelicitpatienthealthcareproviderandhealthsystemstakeholderinputinthedevelopmentofanearlyeconomicevaluationmodelofchimericantigenreceptortcelltherapy
AT kelvinkwchan stakeholderengagementineconomicevaluationprotocolforusingthenominalgrouptechniquetoelicitpatienthealthcareproviderandhealthsystemstakeholderinputinthedevelopmentofanearlyeconomicevaluationmodelofchimericantigenreceptortcelltherapy
AT danielaollendorf stakeholderengagementineconomicevaluationprotocolforusingthenominalgrouptechniquetoelicitpatienthealthcareproviderandhealthsystemstakeholderinputinthedevelopmentofanearlyeconomicevaluationmodelofchimericantigenreceptortcelltherapy
AT natashakekre stakeholderengagementineconomicevaluationprotocolforusingthenominalgrouptechniquetoelicitpatienthealthcareproviderandhealthsystemstakeholderinputinthedevelopmentofanearlyeconomicevaluationmodelofchimericantigenreceptortcelltherapy
AT terryhawrysh stakeholderengagementineconomicevaluationprotocolforusingthenominalgrouptechniquetoelicitpatienthealthcareproviderandhealthsystemstakeholderinputinthedevelopmentofanearlyeconomicevaluationmodelofchimericantigenreceptortcelltherapy
AT haroldatkins stakeholderengagementineconomicevaluationprotocolforusingthenominalgrouptechniquetoelicitpatienthealthcareproviderandhealthsystemstakeholderinputinthedevelopmentofanearlyeconomicevaluationmodelofchimericantigenreceptortcelltherapy
AT dougcoyle stakeholderengagementineconomicevaluationprotocolforusingthenominalgrouptechniquetoelicitpatienthealthcareproviderandhealthsystemstakeholderinputinthedevelopmentofanearlyeconomicevaluationmodelofchimericantigenreceptortcelltherapy
AT mackenziewilson stakeholderengagementineconomicevaluationprotocolforusingthenominalgrouptechniquetoelicitpatienthealthcareproviderandhealthsystemstakeholderinputinthedevelopmentofanearlyeconomicevaluationmodelofchimericantigenreceptortcelltherapy