Energy-Absorbing Countermeasures for Subway-to-Pedestrian Collisions: A Combined Experimental and Multibody Modelling Approach
Epidemiological analysis has revealed key insights into the frequency, severity, and circumstances surrounding subway-to-pedestrian incidents; however, there remains a lack of available impact test data specific to this impact type that can be used in modelling and countermeasure design studies. To...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Applied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/11/6219 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Epidemiological analysis has revealed key insights into the frequency, severity, and circumstances surrounding subway-to-pedestrian incidents; however, there remains a lack of available impact test data specific to this impact type that can be used in modelling and countermeasure design studies. To address this gap, nine controlled impact tests were conducted using a cylindrical headform to derive force–penetration relationships for foam, as well as foam encased in 1 mm aluminium or 3 mm ABS shells. These relationships were validated in MADYMO multibody simulations. Building on a previous multibody computational study of subway-to-pedestrian collisions this research evaluates three passive countermeasure designs using a reduced simulation test matrix: three impact velocities (8, 10, and 12 m/s) and a trough depth of 0.75 m. In subway collisions, due to the essential rigidity of a subway front relative to a pedestrian, it is the pedestrian stiffness characteristics that primarily dictate the contact dynamics, as opposed to a combined effective stiffness. However, the introduction of energy-absorbing countermeasures alters this interaction. Results indicate that modular energy-absorbing panels attached to the train front significantly reduced the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) (by 90%) in the primary impact and pedestrian-to-wheel contact risk (by 58%), with greater effectiveness when a larger frontal area was covered. However, reducing primary impact severity alone did not substantially lower total fatal injury risk. A rail-guard design, used in combination with frontal panels, reduced secondary impact severity and led to the largest overall reduction in fatal injuries. This improvement came with an expected increase in hospitalisation-level outcomes, such as limb trauma, reflecting a shift from fatal to survivable injuries. These findings demonstrate that meaningful reductions in fatalities are achievable, even with just 0.5 m of available space on the train front. While further development is needed, this study supports the conclusion that subway-to-pedestrian fatalities are preventable. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2076-3417 |