REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM ATAS RUU TINDAK PIDANA PENYELENGGARAAN PERADILAN: UPAYA PENINGKATAN KINERJA KOMISI YUDISIAL DAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG

This article was written with the aim of analyzing how the legal reconstruction of the Judicial Administration-Contempt of Court Crime Bill ("hereinafter refered to the “CoC Bill") is a way for the Judicial Commission to improve its performance and relations with the Supreme Court. One si...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Junior B. Gregorius
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Ekasakti LPPM 2024-08-01
Series:Ekasakti Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejurnal-unespadang.ac.id/index.php/EJPP/article/view/1178
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846128046142128128
author Junior B. Gregorius
author_facet Junior B. Gregorius
author_sort Junior B. Gregorius
collection DOAJ
description This article was written with the aim of analyzing how the legal reconstruction of the Judicial Administration-Contempt of Court Crime Bill ("hereinafter refered to the “CoC Bill") is a way for the Judicial Commission to improve its performance and relations with the Supreme Court. One side of the judge (IKAHI) hopes that this bill will soon be passed by the DPR. On the other hand, many groups of people reject the draft because it is considered very excessive and has the potential to threaten the freedom of citizens. By using normative legal research methods and legislative approaches as well as thinking about legal effectiveness according to Lawrence M. Friedman as an analytical tool, this article finds that the legal reconstruction that must be carried out by the Judicial Commission is: first, regarding the definition of criminal acts by justice administrators (contempt of court) second, regarding the principles of criminal law, third, conflicts with criminal procedural law, fourth, regarding articles that overlap with the Criminal Code, fifth, regarding high criminal threats, sixth, regarding the evidentiary system and seventh, theoretical reflection. The results of the legal reconstruction by the Judicial Commission were then discussed with various law enforcement parties, legal observers, academics, practitioners and the public.  The final result of the reconstruction and discussion is that the Draft is submitted back to the DPR.
format Article
id doaj-art-8e3fde3bb4f7421ca7d4aa75285eacbc
institution Kabale University
issn 2746-7538
2747-0369
language English
publishDate 2024-08-01
publisher Universitas Ekasakti LPPM
record_format Article
series Ekasakti Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian
spelling doaj-art-8e3fde3bb4f7421ca7d4aa75285eacbc2024-12-11T06:24:21ZengUniversitas Ekasakti LPPMEkasakti Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian2746-75382747-03692024-08-0142REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM ATAS RUU TINDAK PIDANA PENYELENGGARAAN PERADILAN: UPAYA PENINGKATAN KINERJA KOMISI YUDISIAL DAN MAHKAMAH AGUNGJunior B. Gregorius0Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945-Jakarta This article was written with the aim of analyzing how the legal reconstruction of the Judicial Administration-Contempt of Court Crime Bill ("hereinafter refered to the “CoC Bill") is a way for the Judicial Commission to improve its performance and relations with the Supreme Court. One side of the judge (IKAHI) hopes that this bill will soon be passed by the DPR. On the other hand, many groups of people reject the draft because it is considered very excessive and has the potential to threaten the freedom of citizens. By using normative legal research methods and legislative approaches as well as thinking about legal effectiveness according to Lawrence M. Friedman as an analytical tool, this article finds that the legal reconstruction that must be carried out by the Judicial Commission is: first, regarding the definition of criminal acts by justice administrators (contempt of court) second, regarding the principles of criminal law, third, conflicts with criminal procedural law, fourth, regarding articles that overlap with the Criminal Code, fifth, regarding high criminal threats, sixth, regarding the evidentiary system and seventh, theoretical reflection. The results of the legal reconstruction by the Judicial Commission were then discussed with various law enforcement parties, legal observers, academics, practitioners and the public.  The final result of the reconstruction and discussion is that the Draft is submitted back to the DPR. https://ejurnal-unespadang.ac.id/index.php/EJPP/article/view/1178Legal Reconstruction, CoC Bill, Judicial Commission, Supreme Court.
spellingShingle Junior B. Gregorius
REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM ATAS RUU TINDAK PIDANA PENYELENGGARAAN PERADILAN: UPAYA PENINGKATAN KINERJA KOMISI YUDISIAL DAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG
Ekasakti Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian
Legal Reconstruction, CoC Bill, Judicial Commission, Supreme Court.
title REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM ATAS RUU TINDAK PIDANA PENYELENGGARAAN PERADILAN: UPAYA PENINGKATAN KINERJA KOMISI YUDISIAL DAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG
title_full REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM ATAS RUU TINDAK PIDANA PENYELENGGARAAN PERADILAN: UPAYA PENINGKATAN KINERJA KOMISI YUDISIAL DAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG
title_fullStr REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM ATAS RUU TINDAK PIDANA PENYELENGGARAAN PERADILAN: UPAYA PENINGKATAN KINERJA KOMISI YUDISIAL DAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG
title_full_unstemmed REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM ATAS RUU TINDAK PIDANA PENYELENGGARAAN PERADILAN: UPAYA PENINGKATAN KINERJA KOMISI YUDISIAL DAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG
title_short REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM ATAS RUU TINDAK PIDANA PENYELENGGARAAN PERADILAN: UPAYA PENINGKATAN KINERJA KOMISI YUDISIAL DAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG
title_sort rekonstruksi hukum atas ruu tindak pidana penyelenggaraan peradilan upaya peningkatan kinerja komisi yudisial dan mahkamah agung
topic Legal Reconstruction, CoC Bill, Judicial Commission, Supreme Court.
url https://ejurnal-unespadang.ac.id/index.php/EJPP/article/view/1178
work_keys_str_mv AT juniorbgregorius rekonstruksihukumatasruutindakpidanapenyelenggaraanperadilanupayapeningkatankinerjakomisiyudisialdanmahkamahagung