ZAKAZ PROWADZENIA POJAZDÓW MECHANICZNYCH NA ZAWSZE

A P e r m a n e n t P r o h ib it io n t o D r iv e V e h ic l e s Summary Taking into consideration present needs of security in communication, the legislator has significantly modified the regulations concerning prohibition to drive vehicles. In art. 42 § 3 and § 4 of the Penal Code (hereinafte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Julia Zygmunt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie 2017-06-01
Series:Zeszyty Prawnicze
Online Access:https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/zp/article/view/1753
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846155004419768320
author Julia Zygmunt
author_facet Julia Zygmunt
author_sort Julia Zygmunt
collection DOAJ
description A P e r m a n e n t P r o h ib it io n t o D r iv e V e h ic l e s Summary Taking into consideration present needs of security in communication, the legislator has significantly modified the regulations concerning prohibition to drive vehicles. In art. 42 § 3 and § 4 of the Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as „PC”) the prerequisites of facultative (§ 3) and obligatory (§ 4) application of this measure are defined. From the beginning of the validity of this regulation it has been a subject of discussions in the legal doctrine. As far as discussed regulation seems to be coherent with demands of everyday users of law and is fully justified by increasing traffic offence, especially connected with perpetrator’s state of insobriety, the text of some of the provisions cause many interpretative problems. This study tries to determine some of the aspects concerning facultative and obligatory grounds for adjudicating the measure. The main doubts are caused by a wide definition of the persons, who may be punished with this measure (art. 42 § 3 PC). It provides that, this measure may be applied to the „person participating in a street traffic”, but not only to a driver of a vehicle but also to a pedestrian, if on conditions described in the regulation, he would commit one of the mentioned offences. In case of a graded form of the prohibition, viz. to be applied for a lifetime, described in art. 42 § 4 PC, special severity results from its obligatory adjudication, which brought out objections connected with restricting the court’s discretion. A permanent prohibition of driving any vehicle is a very repressive sanction, especially when applied to professional drivers. It may turn out that the most severe sanction adjudicated for a traffic offence from art. 42 § 3 or § 4 PC, is connected with lasting for life stigma, because, in accordance with Polish Penal Code, a person to whom it was adjudicated, will be regarded as a man with a criminal record.  
format Article
id doaj-art-8d7e7b5f841b4262b54f8d9d4b5b94ff
institution Kabale University
issn 1643-8183
2353-8139
language English
publishDate 2017-06-01
publisher Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
record_format Article
series Zeszyty Prawnicze
spelling doaj-art-8d7e7b5f841b4262b54f8d9d4b5b94ff2024-11-26T17:07:02ZengUniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w WarszawieZeszyty Prawnicze1643-81832353-81392017-06-017210.21697/zp.2007.7.2.07ZAKAZ PROWADZENIA POJAZDÓW MECHANICZNYCH NA ZAWSZEJulia Zygmunt0Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego A P e r m a n e n t P r o h ib it io n t o D r iv e V e h ic l e s Summary Taking into consideration present needs of security in communication, the legislator has significantly modified the regulations concerning prohibition to drive vehicles. In art. 42 § 3 and § 4 of the Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as „PC”) the prerequisites of facultative (§ 3) and obligatory (§ 4) application of this measure are defined. From the beginning of the validity of this regulation it has been a subject of discussions in the legal doctrine. As far as discussed regulation seems to be coherent with demands of everyday users of law and is fully justified by increasing traffic offence, especially connected with perpetrator’s state of insobriety, the text of some of the provisions cause many interpretative problems. This study tries to determine some of the aspects concerning facultative and obligatory grounds for adjudicating the measure. The main doubts are caused by a wide definition of the persons, who may be punished with this measure (art. 42 § 3 PC). It provides that, this measure may be applied to the „person participating in a street traffic”, but not only to a driver of a vehicle but also to a pedestrian, if on conditions described in the regulation, he would commit one of the mentioned offences. In case of a graded form of the prohibition, viz. to be applied for a lifetime, described in art. 42 § 4 PC, special severity results from its obligatory adjudication, which brought out objections connected with restricting the court’s discretion. A permanent prohibition of driving any vehicle is a very repressive sanction, especially when applied to professional drivers. It may turn out that the most severe sanction adjudicated for a traffic offence from art. 42 § 3 or § 4 PC, is connected with lasting for life stigma, because, in accordance with Polish Penal Code, a person to whom it was adjudicated, will be regarded as a man with a criminal record.   https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/zp/article/view/1753
spellingShingle Julia Zygmunt
ZAKAZ PROWADZENIA POJAZDÓW MECHANICZNYCH NA ZAWSZE
Zeszyty Prawnicze
title ZAKAZ PROWADZENIA POJAZDÓW MECHANICZNYCH NA ZAWSZE
title_full ZAKAZ PROWADZENIA POJAZDÓW MECHANICZNYCH NA ZAWSZE
title_fullStr ZAKAZ PROWADZENIA POJAZDÓW MECHANICZNYCH NA ZAWSZE
title_full_unstemmed ZAKAZ PROWADZENIA POJAZDÓW MECHANICZNYCH NA ZAWSZE
title_short ZAKAZ PROWADZENIA POJAZDÓW MECHANICZNYCH NA ZAWSZE
title_sort zakaz prowadzenia pojazdow mechanicznych na zawsze
url https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/zp/article/view/1753
work_keys_str_mv AT juliazygmunt zakazprowadzeniapojazdowmechanicznychnazawsze