Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey
Objectives To develop effective interventions to prevent publishing in presumed predatory journals (ie, journals that display deceptive characteristics, markers or data that cannot be verified), it is helpful to understand the motivations and experiences of those who have published in these journals...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | David Moher, Agnes Grudniewicz, Kelly D Cobey, Manoj M Lalu, Danielle B Rice, Hana Raffoul |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019-03-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/3/e026516.full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Investigating the trustworthiness of research evidence used to inform public health policy: a qualitative interview study on the use of predatory journal citations in policy documents
by: Marc A. Albert, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Predatory Journals: “The Gray Market” of Academic Publishing
by: Abha Verma, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Stinging predatory journals: a brief overview and recommendations
by: Adam Larson, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Predatory journals: What can we do to protect their prey?
by: Christine Laine, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
How do predatory medical journals try to seduce and fool potential authors?: Analysis of an 18-months monitoring survey
by: van Loon Olaf R., et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)