Concordance in diagnostic testing for respiratory pathogens of bighorn sheep

ABSTRACT Reliable diagnostic tests are essential for disease investigation and management. This is particularly true for diseases of free‐ranging wildlife where sampling is logistically difficult precluding retesting. Clinical assays for wildlife diseases frequently vary among laboratories because o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel P. Walsh, E. Frances Cassirer, Michael D. Bonds, Daniel R. Brown, William H. Edwards, Glen C. Weiser, Mark L. Drew, Robert E. Briggs, Karen A. Fox, Michael W. Miller, Sudarvili Shanthalingam, Subramaniam Srikumaran, Thomas E. Besser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-12-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.721
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846120080915562496
author Daniel P. Walsh
E. Frances Cassirer
Michael D. Bonds
Daniel R. Brown
William H. Edwards
Glen C. Weiser
Mark L. Drew
Robert E. Briggs
Karen A. Fox
Michael W. Miller
Sudarvili Shanthalingam
Subramaniam Srikumaran
Thomas E. Besser
author_facet Daniel P. Walsh
E. Frances Cassirer
Michael D. Bonds
Daniel R. Brown
William H. Edwards
Glen C. Weiser
Mark L. Drew
Robert E. Briggs
Karen A. Fox
Michael W. Miller
Sudarvili Shanthalingam
Subramaniam Srikumaran
Thomas E. Besser
author_sort Daniel P. Walsh
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Reliable diagnostic tests are essential for disease investigation and management. This is particularly true for diseases of free‐ranging wildlife where sampling is logistically difficult precluding retesting. Clinical assays for wildlife diseases frequently vary among laboratories because of lack of appropriate standardized commercial kits. Results of diagnostic testing may also be called into question when investigators report different etiologies for disease outbreaks, despite similar clinical and pathologic findings. To evaluate reliability of diagnostic testing for respiratory pathogens of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), we conducted a series of ring tests across 6 laboratories routinely involved in detection of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae, Pasteurellaceae, lktA (the Pasteurellaceae gene encoding leukotoxin), and 3 reference laboratories. Consistency of results for replicate samples within laboratories was high (median agreement = 1.0). Agreement between laboratories was high for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of M. ovipneumoniae and culture isolation of Mannheimia spp. and Bibersteinia trehalosi (median agreement = 0.89–0.95, Kappa = 0.65–0.74), and lower for PCR detection of Mannheimia spp. lktA (median agreement = 0.58, Kappa = 0.12). Most errors on defined status samples were false negatives, suggesting test sensitivity was a greater problem than specificity. However, tests for M. haemolytica and lktA yielded some false positive results. Despite differences in testing protocols, median agreement among laboratories and correct classification of controls for most agents was ≥0.80, meeting or exceeding the standard required by federal proficiency testing programs. This information is valuable for interpreting test results, laboratory quality assessments, and advancing diagnosis of respiratory disease in wild sheep. Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
format Article
id doaj-art-8cf8088ebfc14b0ab96fb3d91446c68c
institution Kabale University
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-8cf8088ebfc14b0ab96fb3d91446c68c2024-12-16T13:16:30ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402016-12-0140463464210.1002/wsb.721Concordance in diagnostic testing for respiratory pathogens of bighorn sheepDaniel P. Walsh0E. Frances Cassirer1Michael D. Bonds2Daniel R. Brown3William H. Edwards4Glen C. Weiser5Mark L. Drew6Robert E. Briggs7Karen A. Fox8Michael W. Miller9Sudarvili Shanthalingam10Subramaniam Srikumaran11Thomas E. Besser12U.S. Geological SurveyNational Wildlife Health Center6006 Schroeder RoadMadisonWI53711USAIdaho Department of Fish and Game3316 16th StreetLewistonID83501USAU.S. Geological SurveyNational Wildlife Health Center6006 Schroeder RoadMadisonWI53711USADepartment of Infectious Diseases and PathologyUniversity of Florida2015 SW 16th AvenueGainesvilleFL32611USAWyoming Game and Fish DepartmentWildlife Health Laboratory1174 Snowy Range RoadLaramieWY82070USACaine Veterinary Teaching CenterUniversity of Idaho1020 E Homedale RoadCaldwellID83607USAIdaho Department of Fish and GameWildlife Health Laboratory16569 S 10th AvenueCaldwellID83607USAU.S. Department of AgricultureNational Animal Disease Center1920 Dayton AvenueAmesIA50010USAColorado Parks and WildlifeWildlife Health Program4330 W Laporte AvenueFort CollinsCO80521USAColorado Parks and WildlifeWildlife Health Program4330 W Laporte AvenueFort CollinsCO80521USADepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and PathologyWashington State UniversityPullmanWA99164USADepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and PathologyWashington State UniversityPullmanWA99164USADepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and PathologyWashington State UniversityPullmanWA99164USAABSTRACT Reliable diagnostic tests are essential for disease investigation and management. This is particularly true for diseases of free‐ranging wildlife where sampling is logistically difficult precluding retesting. Clinical assays for wildlife diseases frequently vary among laboratories because of lack of appropriate standardized commercial kits. Results of diagnostic testing may also be called into question when investigators report different etiologies for disease outbreaks, despite similar clinical and pathologic findings. To evaluate reliability of diagnostic testing for respiratory pathogens of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), we conducted a series of ring tests across 6 laboratories routinely involved in detection of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae, Pasteurellaceae, lktA (the Pasteurellaceae gene encoding leukotoxin), and 3 reference laboratories. Consistency of results for replicate samples within laboratories was high (median agreement = 1.0). Agreement between laboratories was high for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of M. ovipneumoniae and culture isolation of Mannheimia spp. and Bibersteinia trehalosi (median agreement = 0.89–0.95, Kappa = 0.65–0.74), and lower for PCR detection of Mannheimia spp. lktA (median agreement = 0.58, Kappa = 0.12). Most errors on defined status samples were false negatives, suggesting test sensitivity was a greater problem than specificity. However, tests for M. haemolytica and lktA yielded some false positive results. Despite differences in testing protocols, median agreement among laboratories and correct classification of controls for most agents was ≥0.80, meeting or exceeding the standard required by federal proficiency testing programs. This information is valuable for interpreting test results, laboratory quality assessments, and advancing diagnosis of respiratory disease in wild sheep. Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.721Bayesian Kappa statisticclinical testleukotoxinMycoplasma ovipneumoniaePasteurellaceaepneumonia
spellingShingle Daniel P. Walsh
E. Frances Cassirer
Michael D. Bonds
Daniel R. Brown
William H. Edwards
Glen C. Weiser
Mark L. Drew
Robert E. Briggs
Karen A. Fox
Michael W. Miller
Sudarvili Shanthalingam
Subramaniam Srikumaran
Thomas E. Besser
Concordance in diagnostic testing for respiratory pathogens of bighorn sheep
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Bayesian Kappa statistic
clinical test
leukotoxin
Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae
Pasteurellaceae
pneumonia
title Concordance in diagnostic testing for respiratory pathogens of bighorn sheep
title_full Concordance in diagnostic testing for respiratory pathogens of bighorn sheep
title_fullStr Concordance in diagnostic testing for respiratory pathogens of bighorn sheep
title_full_unstemmed Concordance in diagnostic testing for respiratory pathogens of bighorn sheep
title_short Concordance in diagnostic testing for respiratory pathogens of bighorn sheep
title_sort concordance in diagnostic testing for respiratory pathogens of bighorn sheep
topic Bayesian Kappa statistic
clinical test
leukotoxin
Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae
Pasteurellaceae
pneumonia
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.721
work_keys_str_mv AT danielpwalsh concordanceindiagnostictestingforrespiratorypathogensofbighornsheep
AT efrancescassirer concordanceindiagnostictestingforrespiratorypathogensofbighornsheep
AT michaeldbonds concordanceindiagnostictestingforrespiratorypathogensofbighornsheep
AT danielrbrown concordanceindiagnostictestingforrespiratorypathogensofbighornsheep
AT williamhedwards concordanceindiagnostictestingforrespiratorypathogensofbighornsheep
AT glencweiser concordanceindiagnostictestingforrespiratorypathogensofbighornsheep
AT markldrew concordanceindiagnostictestingforrespiratorypathogensofbighornsheep
AT robertebriggs concordanceindiagnostictestingforrespiratorypathogensofbighornsheep
AT karenafox concordanceindiagnostictestingforrespiratorypathogensofbighornsheep
AT michaelwmiller concordanceindiagnostictestingforrespiratorypathogensofbighornsheep
AT sudarvilishanthalingam concordanceindiagnostictestingforrespiratorypathogensofbighornsheep
AT subramaniamsrikumaran concordanceindiagnostictestingforrespiratorypathogensofbighornsheep
AT thomasebesser concordanceindiagnostictestingforrespiratorypathogensofbighornsheep