Cognitive dissonance in tuberculosis stigma: A mixed methods analysis of tuberculosis stigma measurement in South Africa.

<h4>Background</h4>The Patient and Community Perspectives Towards Tuberculosis are the most common measure of tuberculosis (TB) stigma in sub-Saharan Africa. The instrument and its sub-scales (patient and community) have been quantitatively validated but have not undergone qualitative ex...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alanna J Bergman, Chakra Budhathoki, Michael V Relf, Nkateko Ndlouvu, Nomusa Mthimkhulu, Sibongile Lerefolo, Kelly Lowensen, Jason E Farley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLOS Global Public Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003932
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846150907736096768
author Alanna J Bergman
Chakra Budhathoki
Michael V Relf
Nkateko Ndlouvu
Nomusa Mthimkhulu
Sibongile Lerefolo
Kelly Lowensen
Jason E Farley
author_facet Alanna J Bergman
Chakra Budhathoki
Michael V Relf
Nkateko Ndlouvu
Nomusa Mthimkhulu
Sibongile Lerefolo
Kelly Lowensen
Jason E Farley
author_sort Alanna J Bergman
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>The Patient and Community Perspectives Towards Tuberculosis are the most common measure of tuberculosis (TB) stigma in sub-Saharan Africa. The instrument and its sub-scales (patient and community) have been quantitatively validated but have not undergone qualitative exploration in South Africa.<h4>Methods</h4>We explored whether the Patient Perspectives Towards Tuberculosis adequately represents stigma as experienced by people with TB in South Africa. We used mixed methods to explore differences between the lived experience of TB and the quantitative stigma score. Participants with rifampicin-resistant TB and HIV co-infection completed the quantitative scale. Among those, 30 also completed qualitative interviews about their experiences and perceptions of TB stigma. We used cognitive interviewing techniques to interrogate congruence between the two data sources.<h4>Results</h4>The scale demonstrated adequate factor structure with approximately normal distribution. Participants qualitatively described experiences and perceptions of stigma that contradicted their quantitative responses. The scale could not discriminate between participants who reported distressing experiences of TB stigma, and those who did not. Item wording caused confusion, and many elements of TB stigma most discussed by participants are not reflected in the scale.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The Patient Perspectives Towards Tuberculosis lacks theoretical and experiential domains that are central to TB stigma in South Africa. Studies validating stigma scales in new populations should integrate a mixed-methods approach to ensure content validity.
format Article
id doaj-art-8cbb84bd2ea3460fa56274542091faf3
institution Kabale University
issn 2767-3375
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLOS Global Public Health
spelling doaj-art-8cbb84bd2ea3460fa56274542091faf32024-11-28T05:51:01ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLOS Global Public Health2767-33752024-01-01411e000393210.1371/journal.pgph.0003932Cognitive dissonance in tuberculosis stigma: A mixed methods analysis of tuberculosis stigma measurement in South Africa.Alanna J BergmanChakra BudhathokiMichael V RelfNkateko NdlouvuNomusa MthimkhuluSibongile LerefoloKelly LowensenJason E Farley<h4>Background</h4>The Patient and Community Perspectives Towards Tuberculosis are the most common measure of tuberculosis (TB) stigma in sub-Saharan Africa. The instrument and its sub-scales (patient and community) have been quantitatively validated but have not undergone qualitative exploration in South Africa.<h4>Methods</h4>We explored whether the Patient Perspectives Towards Tuberculosis adequately represents stigma as experienced by people with TB in South Africa. We used mixed methods to explore differences between the lived experience of TB and the quantitative stigma score. Participants with rifampicin-resistant TB and HIV co-infection completed the quantitative scale. Among those, 30 also completed qualitative interviews about their experiences and perceptions of TB stigma. We used cognitive interviewing techniques to interrogate congruence between the two data sources.<h4>Results</h4>The scale demonstrated adequate factor structure with approximately normal distribution. Participants qualitatively described experiences and perceptions of stigma that contradicted their quantitative responses. The scale could not discriminate between participants who reported distressing experiences of TB stigma, and those who did not. Item wording caused confusion, and many elements of TB stigma most discussed by participants are not reflected in the scale.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The Patient Perspectives Towards Tuberculosis lacks theoretical and experiential domains that are central to TB stigma in South Africa. Studies validating stigma scales in new populations should integrate a mixed-methods approach to ensure content validity.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003932
spellingShingle Alanna J Bergman
Chakra Budhathoki
Michael V Relf
Nkateko Ndlouvu
Nomusa Mthimkhulu
Sibongile Lerefolo
Kelly Lowensen
Jason E Farley
Cognitive dissonance in tuberculosis stigma: A mixed methods analysis of tuberculosis stigma measurement in South Africa.
PLOS Global Public Health
title Cognitive dissonance in tuberculosis stigma: A mixed methods analysis of tuberculosis stigma measurement in South Africa.
title_full Cognitive dissonance in tuberculosis stigma: A mixed methods analysis of tuberculosis stigma measurement in South Africa.
title_fullStr Cognitive dissonance in tuberculosis stigma: A mixed methods analysis of tuberculosis stigma measurement in South Africa.
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive dissonance in tuberculosis stigma: A mixed methods analysis of tuberculosis stigma measurement in South Africa.
title_short Cognitive dissonance in tuberculosis stigma: A mixed methods analysis of tuberculosis stigma measurement in South Africa.
title_sort cognitive dissonance in tuberculosis stigma a mixed methods analysis of tuberculosis stigma measurement in south africa
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003932
work_keys_str_mv AT alannajbergman cognitivedissonanceintuberculosisstigmaamixedmethodsanalysisoftuberculosisstigmameasurementinsouthafrica
AT chakrabudhathoki cognitivedissonanceintuberculosisstigmaamixedmethodsanalysisoftuberculosisstigmameasurementinsouthafrica
AT michaelvrelf cognitivedissonanceintuberculosisstigmaamixedmethodsanalysisoftuberculosisstigmameasurementinsouthafrica
AT nkatekondlouvu cognitivedissonanceintuberculosisstigmaamixedmethodsanalysisoftuberculosisstigmameasurementinsouthafrica
AT nomusamthimkhulu cognitivedissonanceintuberculosisstigmaamixedmethodsanalysisoftuberculosisstigmameasurementinsouthafrica
AT sibongilelerefolo cognitivedissonanceintuberculosisstigmaamixedmethodsanalysisoftuberculosisstigmameasurementinsouthafrica
AT kellylowensen cognitivedissonanceintuberculosisstigmaamixedmethodsanalysisoftuberculosisstigmameasurementinsouthafrica
AT jasonefarley cognitivedissonanceintuberculosisstigmaamixedmethodsanalysisoftuberculosisstigmameasurementinsouthafrica