ISSUES OF CONTROVERSIAL PRACTICE REFERRING TO THE CRIME OF FALSE TESTIMONY

The crime of false testimony is one of the crimes which are traditionally found in our criminal legislation, the judicial practice recording also specific situations which required the application of the incrimination text which defined this crime. It can be considered that we are dealing with a c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mirela GORUNESCU
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House 2019-05-01
Series:Challenges of the Knowledge Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2019_articles%252F1_criminal_law%252FCKS_2019_criminal_law_011.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846146642045042688
author Mirela GORUNESCU
author_facet Mirela GORUNESCU
author_sort Mirela GORUNESCU
collection DOAJ
description The crime of false testimony is one of the crimes which are traditionally found in our criminal legislation, the judicial practice recording also specific situations which required the application of the incrimination text which defined this crime. It can be considered that we are dealing with a crime which can no longer present any difficulties in relation to the interpretation and application of the incrimination norm with regard to the particular deeds committed. However, many elements are still encountered with respect to the interpretation of the incrimination norm, which generate different solutions of application, a fact which –in accordance with the rigors of the criminal law- is not to be desired. This study approaches two of these issues, namely the juridical significance of the refusal of the person heard as a witness to give any statements in such capacity and, on the other hand, the possibility of the realization of a formal concurrence of crimes when the person summoned as a witness, through his/her false or incomplete statement intends to create a situation more favorable to a person regarded by the factual situation.
format Article
id doaj-art-8c81eba965f64ed8ad6a7efe0e16b9fc
institution Kabale University
issn 2068-7796
language English
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House
record_format Article
series Challenges of the Knowledge Society
spelling doaj-art-8c81eba965f64ed8ad6a7efe0e16b9fc2024-12-02T02:01:35ZengNicolae Titulescu University Publishing HouseChallenges of the Knowledge Society2068-77962019-05-011318488ISSUES OF CONTROVERSIAL PRACTICE REFERRING TO THE CRIME OF FALSE TESTIMONYMirela GORUNESCU0Faculty of Law, “Nicolae Titulescu” University of Bucharest, RomaniaThe crime of false testimony is one of the crimes which are traditionally found in our criminal legislation, the judicial practice recording also specific situations which required the application of the incrimination text which defined this crime. It can be considered that we are dealing with a crime which can no longer present any difficulties in relation to the interpretation and application of the incrimination norm with regard to the particular deeds committed. However, many elements are still encountered with respect to the interpretation of the incrimination norm, which generate different solutions of application, a fact which –in accordance with the rigors of the criminal law- is not to be desired. This study approaches two of these issues, namely the juridical significance of the refusal of the person heard as a witness to give any statements in such capacity and, on the other hand, the possibility of the realization of a formal concurrence of crimes when the person summoned as a witness, through his/her false or incomplete statement intends to create a situation more favorable to a person regarded by the factual situation.http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2019_articles%252F1_criminal_law%252FCKS_2019_criminal_law_011.pdffalse testimonycrimes against the service of justicewitness’ refusal to give a statementthe privilege against self-incriminationfavoring through a false testimony
spellingShingle Mirela GORUNESCU
ISSUES OF CONTROVERSIAL PRACTICE REFERRING TO THE CRIME OF FALSE TESTIMONY
Challenges of the Knowledge Society
false testimony
crimes against the service of justice
witness’ refusal to give a statement
the privilege against self-incrimination
favoring through a false testimony
title ISSUES OF CONTROVERSIAL PRACTICE REFERRING TO THE CRIME OF FALSE TESTIMONY
title_full ISSUES OF CONTROVERSIAL PRACTICE REFERRING TO THE CRIME OF FALSE TESTIMONY
title_fullStr ISSUES OF CONTROVERSIAL PRACTICE REFERRING TO THE CRIME OF FALSE TESTIMONY
title_full_unstemmed ISSUES OF CONTROVERSIAL PRACTICE REFERRING TO THE CRIME OF FALSE TESTIMONY
title_short ISSUES OF CONTROVERSIAL PRACTICE REFERRING TO THE CRIME OF FALSE TESTIMONY
title_sort issues of controversial practice referring to the crime of false testimony
topic false testimony
crimes against the service of justice
witness’ refusal to give a statement
the privilege against self-incrimination
favoring through a false testimony
url http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2019_articles%252F1_criminal_law%252FCKS_2019_criminal_law_011.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mirelagorunescu issuesofcontroversialpracticereferringtothecrimeoffalsetestimony