Validity and Reliability of Wind Speed Calculated by Notio in Comparison with a Hot-Wire Anemometer
Optimizing aerodynamic efficiency is crucial in competitive cycling, where aerodynamic resistance significantly limits performance. Devices like Notio have emerged to calculate the coefficient of drag area (C<sub>D</sub>A) considering dynamic pressure data calculated by an integrated Pit...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Main Authors: | , , , , , | 
|---|---|
| Format: | Article | 
| Language: | English | 
| Published: | 
            MDPI AG
    
        2024-12-01
     | 
| Series: | Designs | 
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2411-9660/8/6/131 | 
| Tags: | 
       Add Tag    
     
      No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
   
 | 
| Summary: | Optimizing aerodynamic efficiency is crucial in competitive cycling, where aerodynamic resistance significantly limits performance. Devices like Notio have emerged to calculate the coefficient of drag area (C<sub>D</sub>A) considering dynamic pressure data calculated by an integrated Pitot-static tube. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of Pitot-static tube calculations through wind speed (WS) data against a hot-wire anemometer (HWA). Sixty recordings were made, lasting 30 s each, in a closed-circuit wind tunnel at four different WS (≈30 to ≈60 km/h), and at five different yaw angles (0° to 20°). Initially, Notio showed WS 6.44% higher than HWA. The calibration process recommended by the Notio manufacturer reduced the differences to a non-significant 0.76%. Comparison of the WS of Notio calibrated and HWA only showed significant differences in the WS group of ≈60 km/h. There were no significant differences in the comparison of yaw angles groups. The reliability of Notio was worse than that of the HWA. In conclusion, Notio calibrated at a speed close to its use allows for reliable and accurate calculation of WS over a wide range of yaw angles under controlled wind tunnel conditions without the presence of a cyclist and bicycle. However, due to the influence of WS on aerodynamic drag, small errors in WS could translate into considerable values of C<sub>D</sub>A for cycling performance. | 
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2411-9660 |