Idigey: a Historical Personality and its Assessment in Russian Historiography

The purpose of the study is to show the dynamics of the assessment of the personality of the ruler of the Golden Horde Idigey in Russian science of the imperial and Soviet periods. Research materials: historical works of Russian historians who touched upon the assessment of the personality of Idige...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Izmailov I.L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, Marjani Institute of History 2024-12-01
Series:Золотоордынское обозрение
Subjects:
Online Access:http://goldhorde.ru/en/stati2024-4-7/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841558927538388992
author Izmailov I.L.
author_facet Izmailov I.L.
author_sort Izmailov I.L.
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of the study is to show the dynamics of the assessment of the personality of the ruler of the Golden Horde Idigey in Russian science of the imperial and Soviet periods. Research materials: historical works of Russian historians who touched upon the assessment of the personality of Idigey in the 1840s – 1960s. Results and novelty of the study: it is shown that the process of studying the history of the Golden Horde and its political history was complex and tortuous. This was especially true of the personality of Idigey, as well as the folk epic dedicated to him. Since the beginning of the study of this epic, historians have become interested in the historical personality himself, the relationship of his fate with the hero of the epic. In Russian science, his personality did not attract much attention. The emerging Tatar historical science accused Idigey of extreme ambitions, considering him the culprit of the campaigns of Aksak-Timur and the collapse of the Golden Horde. In the first half of the 20th century. historians and folklorists were influenced by the ideas of class struggle and tried to present him as a folk hero fighting against feudal oppression, which was undoubtedly a distortion of the facts. In 1944, by a decree of the Central Committee of the CPSU(b), the Golden Horde was recognized as a parasitic state, and Idigey was recognized as the most “insidious and predatory Horde ruler.” Since that time, such a point of view has become decisive and uncontested for almost half a century, which froze Russian science in understanding this period of history.
format Article
id doaj-art-8b2395cfb68a4874a267250303493b9c
institution Kabale University
issn 2308-152X
2313-6197
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, Marjani Institute of History
record_format Article
series Золотоордынское обозрение
spelling doaj-art-8b2395cfb68a4874a267250303493b9c2025-01-05T19:45:39ZengTatarstan Academy of Sciences, Marjani Institute of HistoryЗолотоордынское обозрение2308-152X2313-61972024-12-0112485887210.22378/2313-6197.2024-12-4.858-872Idigey: a Historical Personality and its Assessment in Russian HistoriographyIzmailov I.L.0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2165-2916Marjani Institute of History of the Tatarstan Academy of Sciences Kazan, Russian Federation ismail@inbox.ruThe purpose of the study is to show the dynamics of the assessment of the personality of the ruler of the Golden Horde Idigey in Russian science of the imperial and Soviet periods. Research materials: historical works of Russian historians who touched upon the assessment of the personality of Idigey in the 1840s – 1960s. Results and novelty of the study: it is shown that the process of studying the history of the Golden Horde and its political history was complex and tortuous. This was especially true of the personality of Idigey, as well as the folk epic dedicated to him. Since the beginning of the study of this epic, historians have become interested in the historical personality himself, the relationship of his fate with the hero of the epic. In Russian science, his personality did not attract much attention. The emerging Tatar historical science accused Idigey of extreme ambitions, considering him the culprit of the campaigns of Aksak-Timur and the collapse of the Golden Horde. In the first half of the 20th century. historians and folklorists were influenced by the ideas of class struggle and tried to present him as a folk hero fighting against feudal oppression, which was undoubtedly a distortion of the facts. In 1944, by a decree of the Central Committee of the CPSU(b), the Golden Horde was recognized as a parasitic state, and Idigey was recognized as the most “insidious and predatory Horde ruler.” Since that time, such a point of view has become decisive and uncontested for almost half a century, which froze Russian science in understanding this period of history.http://goldhorde.ru/en/stati2024-4-7/golden horde (ulus of jochi)idigeytoktamyshhistorical personalityheroic epichistoriographytatar folklore
spellingShingle Izmailov I.L.
Idigey: a Historical Personality and its Assessment in Russian Historiography
Золотоордынское обозрение
golden horde (ulus of jochi)
idigey
toktamysh
historical personality
heroic epic
historiography
tatar folklore
title Idigey: a Historical Personality and its Assessment in Russian Historiography
title_full Idigey: a Historical Personality and its Assessment in Russian Historiography
title_fullStr Idigey: a Historical Personality and its Assessment in Russian Historiography
title_full_unstemmed Idigey: a Historical Personality and its Assessment in Russian Historiography
title_short Idigey: a Historical Personality and its Assessment in Russian Historiography
title_sort idigey a historical personality and its assessment in russian historiography
topic golden horde (ulus of jochi)
idigey
toktamysh
historical personality
heroic epic
historiography
tatar folklore
url http://goldhorde.ru/en/stati2024-4-7/
work_keys_str_mv AT izmailovil idigeyahistoricalpersonalityanditsassessmentinrussianhistoriography