A new edition of the Norman Pipe Rolls

The article introduces the first volume of the new edition of the Norman Pipe Rolls and critically examines previous editions. It argues that the Stapleton edition was never finished (due to his ill health) and that manuscripts he failed to thoroughly examine provide the key to understanding the Nor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vincent Moss
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: OpenEdition 2006-05-01
Series:Tabularia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/tabularia/888
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841557320259076096
author Vincent Moss
author_facet Vincent Moss
author_sort Vincent Moss
collection DOAJ
description The article introduces the first volume of the new edition of the Norman Pipe Rolls and critically examines previous editions. It argues that the Stapleton edition was never finished (due to his ill health) and that manuscripts he failed to thoroughly examine provide the key to understanding the Norman pipes i.e. that these rolls were not made at the seating of the Norman Exchequer but are copies. It argues that all previous comparisons between the forms of the English and Norman pipe roll are therefore redundant since the Norman manuscripts can only be compared to the unpublished chancery and other copies of the English Exchequer which the Norman Pipe rolls strongly resemble.
format Article
id doaj-art-8a72034a89924af0a9500d66dd1d37e5
institution Kabale University
issn 1630-7364
language English
publishDate 2006-05-01
publisher OpenEdition
record_format Article
series Tabularia
spelling doaj-art-8a72034a89924af0a9500d66dd1d37e52025-01-06T13:08:29ZengOpenEditionTabularia1630-73642006-05-0110.4000/tabularia.888A new edition of the Norman Pipe RollsVincent MossThe article introduces the first volume of the new edition of the Norman Pipe Rolls and critically examines previous editions. It argues that the Stapleton edition was never finished (due to his ill health) and that manuscripts he failed to thoroughly examine provide the key to understanding the Norman pipes i.e. that these rolls were not made at the seating of the Norman Exchequer but are copies. It argues that all previous comparisons between the forms of the English and Norman pipe roll are therefore redundant since the Norman manuscripts can only be compared to the unpublished chancery and other copies of the English Exchequer which the Norman Pipe rolls strongly resemble.https://journals.openedition.org/tabularia/888StapletonLéchaudé d'AnisyNorman pipe rollnew edition
spellingShingle Vincent Moss
A new edition of the Norman Pipe Rolls
Tabularia
Stapleton
Léchaudé d'Anisy
Norman pipe roll
new edition
title A new edition of the Norman Pipe Rolls
title_full A new edition of the Norman Pipe Rolls
title_fullStr A new edition of the Norman Pipe Rolls
title_full_unstemmed A new edition of the Norman Pipe Rolls
title_short A new edition of the Norman Pipe Rolls
title_sort new edition of the norman pipe rolls
topic Stapleton
Léchaudé d'Anisy
Norman pipe roll
new edition
url https://journals.openedition.org/tabularia/888
work_keys_str_mv AT vincentmoss aneweditionofthenormanpiperolls
AT vincentmoss neweditionofthenormanpiperolls