Comparing three summary indices to assess diet quality of Canadian children: a call for consensus
PurposeThe Healthy Eating Index-Canada 2015 (HEI-C 2015), Diet Quality Index-International (DQI-I), and Healthy Eating Food Index 2019 (HEFI-2019) are commonly used to summarize the quality of Canadian diets. This paper sought to compare these three diet quality indices with respect to their ability...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Nutrition |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2024.1519829/full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841556875855790080 |
---|---|
author | Seyedehatefeh Panahimoghadam Paul J. Veugelers Julia Dabravolskaj Trudy Tran Katerina Maximova Katerina Maximova |
author_facet | Seyedehatefeh Panahimoghadam Paul J. Veugelers Julia Dabravolskaj Trudy Tran Katerina Maximova Katerina Maximova |
author_sort | Seyedehatefeh Panahimoghadam |
collection | DOAJ |
description | PurposeThe Healthy Eating Index-Canada 2015 (HEI-C 2015), Diet Quality Index-International (DQI-I), and Healthy Eating Food Index 2019 (HEFI-2019) are commonly used to summarize the quality of Canadian diets. This paper sought to compare these three diet quality indices with respect to their ability to capture diets of different quality in Canadian children and to discriminate between population subgroups.MethodsData were collected in school-based surveys from grade 4–6 students (9–12 years old) in western Canada through 24-h dietary recall in 2016 (n = 336), 2018 (n = 454), and 2020/2021 (n = 909). Diet quality was assessed using HEI-C 2015, DQI-I and HEFI-2019. Agreement between the three indices was assessed using weighted Cohen’s kappa. Univariate and multivariable linear regression models assessed diet quality according to student’s sex, grade level, school material/social deprivation, and geographic region.ResultsHEFI-2019 scores had the widest range, while DQI-I had the smallest. Agreement was 0.55 between HEI-C 2015 and DQI-I, 0.38 between HEI-C 2015 and HEFI-2019, and 0.29 between DQI-I and HEFI-2019. Boys and students from materially deprived areas reported diets of lower quality, irrespective of the index. There were no differences in diet quality across grade levels and geographic region. Energy consumption was associated positively with DQI-I and negatively HEFI-2019 scores.ConclusionThe three indices demonstrated fair to moderate agreement and varying ability to discriminate diet quality between different population subgroups of Canadian children. This study shows that the choice of a diet quality index affects the interpretation of results and practical considerations, yielding different conclusions with respect to the determinants of children’s diet quality. Seeking consensus on which diet quality index to use for research, policy and/or practice would help support dietary research and policy development, and promote dietary guidelines implementation. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-8a04d035cc3343a797f45e3448e6cc00 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2296-861X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Nutrition |
spelling | doaj-art-8a04d035cc3343a797f45e3448e6cc002025-01-07T05:23:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Nutrition2296-861X2025-01-011110.3389/fnut.2024.15198291519829Comparing three summary indices to assess diet quality of Canadian children: a call for consensusSeyedehatefeh Panahimoghadam0Paul J. Veugelers1Julia Dabravolskaj2Trudy Tran3Katerina Maximova4Katerina Maximova5School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, CanadaSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, CanadaMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, CanadaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, CanadaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaPurposeThe Healthy Eating Index-Canada 2015 (HEI-C 2015), Diet Quality Index-International (DQI-I), and Healthy Eating Food Index 2019 (HEFI-2019) are commonly used to summarize the quality of Canadian diets. This paper sought to compare these three diet quality indices with respect to their ability to capture diets of different quality in Canadian children and to discriminate between population subgroups.MethodsData were collected in school-based surveys from grade 4–6 students (9–12 years old) in western Canada through 24-h dietary recall in 2016 (n = 336), 2018 (n = 454), and 2020/2021 (n = 909). Diet quality was assessed using HEI-C 2015, DQI-I and HEFI-2019. Agreement between the three indices was assessed using weighted Cohen’s kappa. Univariate and multivariable linear regression models assessed diet quality according to student’s sex, grade level, school material/social deprivation, and geographic region.ResultsHEFI-2019 scores had the widest range, while DQI-I had the smallest. Agreement was 0.55 between HEI-C 2015 and DQI-I, 0.38 between HEI-C 2015 and HEFI-2019, and 0.29 between DQI-I and HEFI-2019. Boys and students from materially deprived areas reported diets of lower quality, irrespective of the index. There were no differences in diet quality across grade levels and geographic region. Energy consumption was associated positively with DQI-I and negatively HEFI-2019 scores.ConclusionThe three indices demonstrated fair to moderate agreement and varying ability to discriminate diet quality between different population subgroups of Canadian children. This study shows that the choice of a diet quality index affects the interpretation of results and practical considerations, yielding different conclusions with respect to the determinants of children’s diet quality. Seeking consensus on which diet quality index to use for research, policy and/or practice would help support dietary research and policy development, and promote dietary guidelines implementation.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2024.1519829/fulldietary assessmentdiet quality indexchildrenhealthy eatingepidemiologypublic health |
spellingShingle | Seyedehatefeh Panahimoghadam Paul J. Veugelers Julia Dabravolskaj Trudy Tran Katerina Maximova Katerina Maximova Comparing three summary indices to assess diet quality of Canadian children: a call for consensus Frontiers in Nutrition dietary assessment diet quality index children healthy eating epidemiology public health |
title | Comparing three summary indices to assess diet quality of Canadian children: a call for consensus |
title_full | Comparing three summary indices to assess diet quality of Canadian children: a call for consensus |
title_fullStr | Comparing three summary indices to assess diet quality of Canadian children: a call for consensus |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing three summary indices to assess diet quality of Canadian children: a call for consensus |
title_short | Comparing three summary indices to assess diet quality of Canadian children: a call for consensus |
title_sort | comparing three summary indices to assess diet quality of canadian children a call for consensus |
topic | dietary assessment diet quality index children healthy eating epidemiology public health |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2024.1519829/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seyedehatefehpanahimoghadam comparingthreesummaryindicestoassessdietqualityofcanadianchildrenacallforconsensus AT pauljveugelers comparingthreesummaryindicestoassessdietqualityofcanadianchildrenacallforconsensus AT juliadabravolskaj comparingthreesummaryindicestoassessdietqualityofcanadianchildrenacallforconsensus AT trudytran comparingthreesummaryindicestoassessdietqualityofcanadianchildrenacallforconsensus AT katerinamaximova comparingthreesummaryindicestoassessdietqualityofcanadianchildrenacallforconsensus AT katerinamaximova comparingthreesummaryindicestoassessdietqualityofcanadianchildrenacallforconsensus |