Legitimacy and Reflexivity in International Investment Arbitration: A New Self-Restraint?
There are at least two views within investment arbitration about how to respond to legitimation problems associated with inconsistent rulings, latitudinal interpretations, and arbitral bias and conflicts of interest. Some prefer to keep the regime on course and not respond to these outside...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | David Schneiderman |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law
2011-05-01
|
| Series: | Oñati Socio-Legal Series |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/66 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
CRIMEA AND THE POLITICS OF LEGITIMACY IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
by: A. A. Vlasov, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01) -
Human Rights and Investment Arbitration – Fields of Interaction
by: Magdalena Michalska-Guzik
Published: (2022-07-01) -
Abuse of Law in International Arbitration
by: D. M. Maksimov, et al.
Published: (2024-07-01) -
Corporations and the Uses of Law: International Investment Arbitration as a “Multilateral Legal Order"
by: Peter Muchlinski
Published: (2011-03-01) -
Legitimacy as the sign of the right
by: I. L. Chestnov
Published: (2019-10-01)