Rethinking vegetarianism: Differences between vegetarians and non-vegetarians in the endorsement of basic human values.

Differences between the basic human values of vegetarians and non-vegetarians were examined in three studies of samples of adults drawn from general populations, one in the US and two in Poland. Vegetarians were oversampled in the US study (514 vegetarians, 540 non-vegetarians) and in one study in P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John B Nezlek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323202
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849337617354588160
author John B Nezlek
author_facet John B Nezlek
author_sort John B Nezlek
collection DOAJ
description Differences between the basic human values of vegetarians and non-vegetarians were examined in three studies of samples of adults drawn from general populations, one in the US and two in Poland. Vegetarians were oversampled in the US study (514 vegetarians, 540 non-vegetarians) and in one study in Poland (301 vegetarians, 335 non-vegetarians). In the other Polish study, there 68 vegetarians and 1943 non-vegetarians. Values were measured using Schwartz's Portrait Value Questionnaire. Across all three studies, Benevolence, Security, and Conformity values were significantly less important for vegetarians than they were for non-vegetarians, although the difference for Conformity was marginally significant (p < .10) in the US study. Across all three studies, vegetarians also endorsed Tradition values less strongly than non-vegetarians, although this difference was not statistically significant in the US study (p = .12). Across all three studies, vegetarians endorsed Stimulation, Achievement, and Power values more strongly than non-vegetarians did. There was only one value, Self-direction, for which the difference between vegetarians and non-vegetarians varied between the two countries. In the US, Self-direction values were more important for non-vegetarians than they were for vegetarians, whereas in Poland the difference was in the opposite direction. Across the three studies, there were only a few instances in which differences between vegetarians and non-vegetarians varied as a function of respondents' gender. These results suggest that following a vegetarian diet represents a manifestation of values that emphasize independence and individuality, a possibility that is somewhat at odds with how vegetarianism is often discussed.
format Article
id doaj-art-890d45ff937b4f70a8a26160b5a55d20
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-890d45ff937b4f70a8a26160b5a55d202025-08-20T03:44:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01205e032320210.1371/journal.pone.0323202Rethinking vegetarianism: Differences between vegetarians and non-vegetarians in the endorsement of basic human values.John B NezlekDifferences between the basic human values of vegetarians and non-vegetarians were examined in three studies of samples of adults drawn from general populations, one in the US and two in Poland. Vegetarians were oversampled in the US study (514 vegetarians, 540 non-vegetarians) and in one study in Poland (301 vegetarians, 335 non-vegetarians). In the other Polish study, there 68 vegetarians and 1943 non-vegetarians. Values were measured using Schwartz's Portrait Value Questionnaire. Across all three studies, Benevolence, Security, and Conformity values were significantly less important for vegetarians than they were for non-vegetarians, although the difference for Conformity was marginally significant (p < .10) in the US study. Across all three studies, vegetarians also endorsed Tradition values less strongly than non-vegetarians, although this difference was not statistically significant in the US study (p = .12). Across all three studies, vegetarians endorsed Stimulation, Achievement, and Power values more strongly than non-vegetarians did. There was only one value, Self-direction, for which the difference between vegetarians and non-vegetarians varied between the two countries. In the US, Self-direction values were more important for non-vegetarians than they were for vegetarians, whereas in Poland the difference was in the opposite direction. Across the three studies, there were only a few instances in which differences between vegetarians and non-vegetarians varied as a function of respondents' gender. These results suggest that following a vegetarian diet represents a manifestation of values that emphasize independence and individuality, a possibility that is somewhat at odds with how vegetarianism is often discussed.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323202
spellingShingle John B Nezlek
Rethinking vegetarianism: Differences between vegetarians and non-vegetarians in the endorsement of basic human values.
PLoS ONE
title Rethinking vegetarianism: Differences between vegetarians and non-vegetarians in the endorsement of basic human values.
title_full Rethinking vegetarianism: Differences between vegetarians and non-vegetarians in the endorsement of basic human values.
title_fullStr Rethinking vegetarianism: Differences between vegetarians and non-vegetarians in the endorsement of basic human values.
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking vegetarianism: Differences between vegetarians and non-vegetarians in the endorsement of basic human values.
title_short Rethinking vegetarianism: Differences between vegetarians and non-vegetarians in the endorsement of basic human values.
title_sort rethinking vegetarianism differences between vegetarians and non vegetarians in the endorsement of basic human values
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323202
work_keys_str_mv AT johnbnezlek rethinkingvegetarianismdifferencesbetweenvegetariansandnonvegetariansintheendorsementofbasichumanvalues