Start Time Planning for Cyclic Queuing and Forwarding in Time-Sensitive Networks

Time-sensitive networking (TSN) is a kind of network communication technology applied in fields such as industrial internet and intelligent transportation, capable of meeting the application requirements for precise time synchronization and low-latency deterministic forwarding. In TSN, cyclic queuin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daqian Liu, Zhewei Zhang, Yuntao Shi, Yingying Wang, Jingcheng Guo, Zhenwu Lei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-10-01
Series:Mathematics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/21/3382
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Time-sensitive networking (TSN) is a kind of network communication technology applied in fields such as industrial internet and intelligent transportation, capable of meeting the application requirements for precise time synchronization and low-latency deterministic forwarding. In TSN, cyclic queuing and forwarding (CQF) is a traffic shaping mechanism that has been extensively discussed in the recent literature, which allows the delay of time-triggered (TT) flow to be definite and easily calculable. In this paper, two algorithms are designed to tackle the start time planning issue with the CQF mechanism, namely the flow–path–offset joint scheduling (FPOJS) algorithm and congestion-aware scheduling algorithm, to improve the scheduling success ratio of TT flows. The FPOJS algorithm, which adopts a novel scheduling object—a combination of flow, path, and offset—implements scheduling in descending order of a well-designed priority that considers the resource capacity and resource requirements of ports. The congestion-aware scheduling algorithm identifies and optimizes congested ports during scheduling and substantially improves the scheduling success ratio by dynamically configuring port resources. The experimental results demonstrate that the FPOJS algorithm achieves a 39% improvement in the scheduling success ratio over the naive algorithm, 13% over the Tabu-ITP algorithm, and 10% over the MSS algorithm. Moreover, the algorithm exhibits a higher scheduling success ratio under large-scale TSN.
ISSN:2227-7390