Digital divides in telehealth accessibility for cancer care in the United States

Abstract Telehealth has been promoted as a solution to spatial healthcare access barriers, yet its role in addressing cancer care disparities remains uncertain, particularly in the context of digital divides in broadband availability and affordability. This study assessed spatial and telehealth acce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lingbo Liu, Tracy Onega, Erika L. Moen, Anna N. A. Tosteson, Rebecca E. Smith, Qianfei Wang, Lauren Cowan, Fahui Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-08-01
Series:npj Digital Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01931-5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849225923422846976
author Lingbo Liu
Tracy Onega
Erika L. Moen
Anna N. A. Tosteson
Rebecca E. Smith
Qianfei Wang
Lauren Cowan
Fahui Wang
author_facet Lingbo Liu
Tracy Onega
Erika L. Moen
Anna N. A. Tosteson
Rebecca E. Smith
Qianfei Wang
Lauren Cowan
Fahui Wang
author_sort Lingbo Liu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Telehealth has been promoted as a solution to spatial healthcare access barriers, yet its role in addressing cancer care disparities remains uncertain, particularly in the context of digital divides in broadband availability and affordability. This study assessed spatial and telehealth accessibility to cancer care across 33,499 ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTA) in the United States using the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) and two-step virtual catchment area (2SVCA) methods, respectively. Incorporating physician locations, cancer incidence, travel time based on transportation networks, and broadband coverage and subscription rates, we found that accessibility declined from urban to rural areas and was lower in ZCTA with greater socioeconomic deprivation. Areas with higher proportions of Black and Hispanic populations showed modestly higher access scores, yet a three-way interaction among rurality, deprivation, and racial ethnic composition revealed compounded disadvantages. Telehealth reduced but did not eliminate these gaps, highlighting how its reliance on digital infrastructure may both alleviate and intensify disparities in cancer care access.
format Article
id doaj-art-883173cff64b4db58da363002e78f6f6
institution Kabale University
issn 2398-6352
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series npj Digital Medicine
spelling doaj-art-883173cff64b4db58da363002e78f6f62025-08-24T11:51:59ZengNature Portfolionpj Digital Medicine2398-63522025-08-018111110.1038/s41746-025-01931-5Digital divides in telehealth accessibility for cancer care in the United StatesLingbo Liu0Tracy Onega1Erika L. Moen2Anna N. A. Tosteson3Rebecca E. Smith4Qianfei Wang5Lauren Cowan6Fahui Wang7Center for Geographic Analysis, Harvard UniversityHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of UtahDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at DartmouthThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at DartmouthThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at DartmouthThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at DartmouthHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of UtahDepartment of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State UniversityAbstract Telehealth has been promoted as a solution to spatial healthcare access barriers, yet its role in addressing cancer care disparities remains uncertain, particularly in the context of digital divides in broadband availability and affordability. This study assessed spatial and telehealth accessibility to cancer care across 33,499 ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTA) in the United States using the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) and two-step virtual catchment area (2SVCA) methods, respectively. Incorporating physician locations, cancer incidence, travel time based on transportation networks, and broadband coverage and subscription rates, we found that accessibility declined from urban to rural areas and was lower in ZCTA with greater socioeconomic deprivation. Areas with higher proportions of Black and Hispanic populations showed modestly higher access scores, yet a three-way interaction among rurality, deprivation, and racial ethnic composition revealed compounded disadvantages. Telehealth reduced but did not eliminate these gaps, highlighting how its reliance on digital infrastructure may both alleviate and intensify disparities in cancer care access.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01931-5
spellingShingle Lingbo Liu
Tracy Onega
Erika L. Moen
Anna N. A. Tosteson
Rebecca E. Smith
Qianfei Wang
Lauren Cowan
Fahui Wang
Digital divides in telehealth accessibility for cancer care in the United States
npj Digital Medicine
title Digital divides in telehealth accessibility for cancer care in the United States
title_full Digital divides in telehealth accessibility for cancer care in the United States
title_fullStr Digital divides in telehealth accessibility for cancer care in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Digital divides in telehealth accessibility for cancer care in the United States
title_short Digital divides in telehealth accessibility for cancer care in the United States
title_sort digital divides in telehealth accessibility for cancer care in the united states
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01931-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lingboliu digitaldividesintelehealthaccessibilityforcancercareintheunitedstates
AT tracyonega digitaldividesintelehealthaccessibilityforcancercareintheunitedstates
AT erikalmoen digitaldividesintelehealthaccessibilityforcancercareintheunitedstates
AT annanatosteson digitaldividesintelehealthaccessibilityforcancercareintheunitedstates
AT rebeccaesmith digitaldividesintelehealthaccessibilityforcancercareintheunitedstates
AT qianfeiwang digitaldividesintelehealthaccessibilityforcancercareintheunitedstates
AT laurencowan digitaldividesintelehealthaccessibilityforcancercareintheunitedstates
AT fahuiwang digitaldividesintelehealthaccessibilityforcancercareintheunitedstates