Modeling Geomagnetically Induced Currents in the Alberta Power Network: Comparison and Validation Using Hall Probe Measurements During a Magnetic Storm
Abstract During space weather events, geomagnetic disturbances (GMDs) induce geoelectric fields which drive geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) through electrically‐grounded power transmission lines. Alberta, Canada—located near the auroral zone and thus prone to large GMDs—has a dense network o...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024-04-01
|
| Series: | Space Weather |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003813 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841536416201310208 |
|---|---|
| author | Darcy Cordell Ian R. Mann Hannah Parry Martyn J. Unsworth Ryan Cui Colin Clark Eva Kelemen Ryan MacMullin |
| author_facet | Darcy Cordell Ian R. Mann Hannah Parry Martyn J. Unsworth Ryan Cui Colin Clark Eva Kelemen Ryan MacMullin |
| author_sort | Darcy Cordell |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract During space weather events, geomagnetic disturbances (GMDs) induce geoelectric fields which drive geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) through electrically‐grounded power transmission lines. Alberta, Canada—located near the auroral zone and thus prone to large GMDs—has a dense network of magnetometer stations and surface impedance measurements to better characterize the GMD and ground conductivity, respectively. GIC monitoring devices were recently installed at five substation transformer neutrals, providing a unique opportunity to compare data to modeled GICs. GICs are modeled across the >240 kV provincial power transmission network during a moderate GMD event on 24 April 2023. GIC monitoring devices measured larger neutral‐to‐ground currents than expected up to 117 Amps during peak storm time, providing unequivocal evidence linking network GICs with GMDs. The model performs reasonably well (correlation coefficients >0.5; performance parameter >0.15) at four of five substations, but generally underestimates peak GIC values (sometimes by a factor >2), suggesting that the present model underrepresents overall network risk. The model performs poorly at one of the five substations (correlation = 0.46; performance parameter = 0.10), the reasons for which may be due to simplifications and/or unknowns in network parameters. Despite these underestimates, during this GMD, the model predicts the largest GIC at substations located in the northeastern part of the province (240 kV) or around Edmonton (500 kV)—regions which have significant electrical and industrial infrastructure. Further refinement of the network model with transformer resistances, more line and earthing resistances, and/or including lower voltage levels is necessary to improve data fit. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-87109fa0299c450ca19bedf03dc5d714 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1542-7390 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Space Weather |
| spelling | doaj-art-87109fa0299c450ca19bedf03dc5d7142025-01-14T16:27:27ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902024-04-01224n/an/a10.1029/2023SW003813Modeling Geomagnetically Induced Currents in the Alberta Power Network: Comparison and Validation Using Hall Probe Measurements During a Magnetic StormDarcy Cordell0Ian R. Mann1Hannah Parry2Martyn J. Unsworth3Ryan Cui4Colin Clark5Eva Kelemen6Ryan MacMullin7Department of Physics University of Alberta Edmonton AB CanadaDepartment of Physics University of Alberta Edmonton AB CanadaDepartment of Physics University of Alberta Edmonton AB CanadaDepartment of Physics University of Alberta Edmonton AB CanadaAltaLink L.P. Calgary AB CanadaPattern Energy Toronto ON CanadaAltaLink L.P. Calgary AB CanadaAltaLink L.P. Calgary AB CanadaAbstract During space weather events, geomagnetic disturbances (GMDs) induce geoelectric fields which drive geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) through electrically‐grounded power transmission lines. Alberta, Canada—located near the auroral zone and thus prone to large GMDs—has a dense network of magnetometer stations and surface impedance measurements to better characterize the GMD and ground conductivity, respectively. GIC monitoring devices were recently installed at five substation transformer neutrals, providing a unique opportunity to compare data to modeled GICs. GICs are modeled across the >240 kV provincial power transmission network during a moderate GMD event on 24 April 2023. GIC monitoring devices measured larger neutral‐to‐ground currents than expected up to 117 Amps during peak storm time, providing unequivocal evidence linking network GICs with GMDs. The model performs reasonably well (correlation coefficients >0.5; performance parameter >0.15) at four of five substations, but generally underestimates peak GIC values (sometimes by a factor >2), suggesting that the present model underrepresents overall network risk. The model performs poorly at one of the five substations (correlation = 0.46; performance parameter = 0.10), the reasons for which may be due to simplifications and/or unknowns in network parameters. Despite these underestimates, during this GMD, the model predicts the largest GIC at substations located in the northeastern part of the province (240 kV) or around Edmonton (500 kV)—regions which have significant electrical and industrial infrastructure. Further refinement of the network model with transformer resistances, more line and earthing resistances, and/or including lower voltage levels is necessary to improve data fit.https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003813geomagnetically induced currentsspace weathermodeled GICsgeomagnetic stormmodel validationAlberta |
| spellingShingle | Darcy Cordell Ian R. Mann Hannah Parry Martyn J. Unsworth Ryan Cui Colin Clark Eva Kelemen Ryan MacMullin Modeling Geomagnetically Induced Currents in the Alberta Power Network: Comparison and Validation Using Hall Probe Measurements During a Magnetic Storm Space Weather geomagnetically induced currents space weather modeled GICs geomagnetic storm model validation Alberta |
| title | Modeling Geomagnetically Induced Currents in the Alberta Power Network: Comparison and Validation Using Hall Probe Measurements During a Magnetic Storm |
| title_full | Modeling Geomagnetically Induced Currents in the Alberta Power Network: Comparison and Validation Using Hall Probe Measurements During a Magnetic Storm |
| title_fullStr | Modeling Geomagnetically Induced Currents in the Alberta Power Network: Comparison and Validation Using Hall Probe Measurements During a Magnetic Storm |
| title_full_unstemmed | Modeling Geomagnetically Induced Currents in the Alberta Power Network: Comparison and Validation Using Hall Probe Measurements During a Magnetic Storm |
| title_short | Modeling Geomagnetically Induced Currents in the Alberta Power Network: Comparison and Validation Using Hall Probe Measurements During a Magnetic Storm |
| title_sort | modeling geomagnetically induced currents in the alberta power network comparison and validation using hall probe measurements during a magnetic storm |
| topic | geomagnetically induced currents space weather modeled GICs geomagnetic storm model validation Alberta |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003813 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT darcycordell modelinggeomagneticallyinducedcurrentsinthealbertapowernetworkcomparisonandvalidationusinghallprobemeasurementsduringamagneticstorm AT ianrmann modelinggeomagneticallyinducedcurrentsinthealbertapowernetworkcomparisonandvalidationusinghallprobemeasurementsduringamagneticstorm AT hannahparry modelinggeomagneticallyinducedcurrentsinthealbertapowernetworkcomparisonandvalidationusinghallprobemeasurementsduringamagneticstorm AT martynjunsworth modelinggeomagneticallyinducedcurrentsinthealbertapowernetworkcomparisonandvalidationusinghallprobemeasurementsduringamagneticstorm AT ryancui modelinggeomagneticallyinducedcurrentsinthealbertapowernetworkcomparisonandvalidationusinghallprobemeasurementsduringamagneticstorm AT colinclark modelinggeomagneticallyinducedcurrentsinthealbertapowernetworkcomparisonandvalidationusinghallprobemeasurementsduringamagneticstorm AT evakelemen modelinggeomagneticallyinducedcurrentsinthealbertapowernetworkcomparisonandvalidationusinghallprobemeasurementsduringamagneticstorm AT ryanmacmullin modelinggeomagneticallyinducedcurrentsinthealbertapowernetworkcomparisonandvalidationusinghallprobemeasurementsduringamagneticstorm |