One- versus two-stage septic hip and knee revision surgery: a comparative cohort outcome study with short- to mid-term follow-up
<p><strong>Introduction</strong>: One-stage revisions seem to have similar reinfection rates compared to two-stage revisions for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections based on retrospective cohort studies with a large variety of indications and treatment protocols. This...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | M. M. J. Jacobs, P. J. C. Heesterbeek, K. Veerman, J. H. M. Goosen |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Bone and Joint Infection |
| Online Access: | https://jbji.copernicus.org/articles/10/185/2025/jbji-10-185-2025.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Early Administration of Rifampicin Does Not Induce Increased Resistance in Septic Two-Stage Revision Knee and Hip Arthroplasty
by: Leonard Grünwald, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
Robotic‐assisted hip and knee revision arthroplasty: A scoping review
by: Michele Venosa, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Evaluation of one stage Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Versus Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
by: Ahmed Sarhan Mazyon
Published: (2024-10-01) -
Mid-term results after DAIR for patients with acute periprosthetic joint infections of the hip or knee
by: Alberto Alfieri Zellner, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasties Using Short Femoral Stems: Is It Possible?
by: Ioannis S Vasios, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01)