The Simplified Reference Tissue Model with F-Fallypride Positron Emission Tomography: Choice of Reference Region

The development of high-affinity radiotracers for positron emission tomography (PET) has allowed for quantification of dopamine receptors in extrastriatal and striatal regions of the brain. As these new radiotracers have distinctly different kinetic properties than their predecessors, it is importan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kenji Ishibashi, Chelsea L. Robertson, Mark A. Mandelkern, Andrew T. Morgan, Edythe D. London
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2013-11-01
Series:Molecular Imaging
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2013.00065
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841561863124418560
author Kenji Ishibashi
Chelsea L. Robertson
Mark A. Mandelkern
Andrew T. Morgan
Edythe D. London
author_facet Kenji Ishibashi
Chelsea L. Robertson
Mark A. Mandelkern
Andrew T. Morgan
Edythe D. London
author_sort Kenji Ishibashi
collection DOAJ
description The development of high-affinity radiotracers for positron emission tomography (PET) has allowed for quantification of dopamine receptors in extrastriatal and striatal regions of the brain. As these new radiotracers have distinctly different kinetic properties than their predecessors, it is important to examine the suitability of kinetic models to represent their uptake, distribution, and in vivo washout. Using the simplified reference tissue model, we investigated the influence of reference region choice on the striatal binding potential of 18 F-fallypride, a high-affinity dopamine D 2 /D 3 receptor ligand. We compared the use of the visual cortex and a white matter region (superior longitudinal fasciculus) to the cerebellum, a commonly used reference tissue, in a PET-fallypride study of healthy and methamphetamine-dependent subjects. Compared to the cerebellum, use of the visual cortex produced significantly greater sample variance in binding potential relative to nondisplaceable uptake (BP ND ). Use of the white matter region was associated with BP ND values and sample variance similar to those obtained with the cerebellum and a larger effect size for the group differences in striatal BP ND between healthy and methamphetamine-dependent subjects. Our results do not support the use of the visual cortex as a reference region in 18 F-fallypride studies and suggest that white matter may be a reasonable alternative to the cerebellum as it displays similar statistical and kinetic properties.
format Article
id doaj-art-850ba1de0ece49518540bb0bf0d6779b
institution Kabale University
issn 1536-0121
language English
publishDate 2013-11-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Molecular Imaging
spelling doaj-art-850ba1de0ece49518540bb0bf0d6779b2025-01-03T01:23:08ZengSAGE PublishingMolecular Imaging1536-01212013-11-011210.2310/7290.2013.0006510.2310_7290.2013.00065The Simplified Reference Tissue Model with F-Fallypride Positron Emission Tomography: Choice of Reference RegionKenji IshibashiChelsea L. RobertsonMark A. MandelkernAndrew T. MorganEdythe D. LondonThe development of high-affinity radiotracers for positron emission tomography (PET) has allowed for quantification of dopamine receptors in extrastriatal and striatal regions of the brain. As these new radiotracers have distinctly different kinetic properties than their predecessors, it is important to examine the suitability of kinetic models to represent their uptake, distribution, and in vivo washout. Using the simplified reference tissue model, we investigated the influence of reference region choice on the striatal binding potential of 18 F-fallypride, a high-affinity dopamine D 2 /D 3 receptor ligand. We compared the use of the visual cortex and a white matter region (superior longitudinal fasciculus) to the cerebellum, a commonly used reference tissue, in a PET-fallypride study of healthy and methamphetamine-dependent subjects. Compared to the cerebellum, use of the visual cortex produced significantly greater sample variance in binding potential relative to nondisplaceable uptake (BP ND ). Use of the white matter region was associated with BP ND values and sample variance similar to those obtained with the cerebellum and a larger effect size for the group differences in striatal BP ND between healthy and methamphetamine-dependent subjects. Our results do not support the use of the visual cortex as a reference region in 18 F-fallypride studies and suggest that white matter may be a reasonable alternative to the cerebellum as it displays similar statistical and kinetic properties.https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2013.00065
spellingShingle Kenji Ishibashi
Chelsea L. Robertson
Mark A. Mandelkern
Andrew T. Morgan
Edythe D. London
The Simplified Reference Tissue Model with F-Fallypride Positron Emission Tomography: Choice of Reference Region
Molecular Imaging
title The Simplified Reference Tissue Model with F-Fallypride Positron Emission Tomography: Choice of Reference Region
title_full The Simplified Reference Tissue Model with F-Fallypride Positron Emission Tomography: Choice of Reference Region
title_fullStr The Simplified Reference Tissue Model with F-Fallypride Positron Emission Tomography: Choice of Reference Region
title_full_unstemmed The Simplified Reference Tissue Model with F-Fallypride Positron Emission Tomography: Choice of Reference Region
title_short The Simplified Reference Tissue Model with F-Fallypride Positron Emission Tomography: Choice of Reference Region
title_sort simplified reference tissue model with f fallypride positron emission tomography choice of reference region
url https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2013.00065
work_keys_str_mv AT kenjiishibashi thesimplifiedreferencetissuemodelwithffallypridepositronemissiontomographychoiceofreferenceregion
AT chelsealrobertson thesimplifiedreferencetissuemodelwithffallypridepositronemissiontomographychoiceofreferenceregion
AT markamandelkern thesimplifiedreferencetissuemodelwithffallypridepositronemissiontomographychoiceofreferenceregion
AT andrewtmorgan thesimplifiedreferencetissuemodelwithffallypridepositronemissiontomographychoiceofreferenceregion
AT edythedlondon thesimplifiedreferencetissuemodelwithffallypridepositronemissiontomographychoiceofreferenceregion
AT kenjiishibashi simplifiedreferencetissuemodelwithffallypridepositronemissiontomographychoiceofreferenceregion
AT chelsealrobertson simplifiedreferencetissuemodelwithffallypridepositronemissiontomographychoiceofreferenceregion
AT markamandelkern simplifiedreferencetissuemodelwithffallypridepositronemissiontomographychoiceofreferenceregion
AT andrewtmorgan simplifiedreferencetissuemodelwithffallypridepositronemissiontomographychoiceofreferenceregion
AT edythedlondon simplifiedreferencetissuemodelwithffallypridepositronemissiontomographychoiceofreferenceregion