The Strange Case of Dr. Magelssen and Mr. Hofmann
I argued, in the article “Is prostitution harmful?”, that if one holds that casual sex is not per se harmful, one should hold that neither is prostitution. Bjørn Hofmann and Morten Magelssen make the case that my article is methodologically flawed – so flawed, in fact, that it can serve as a caution...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Ole Martin Moen |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Norwegian Bokmål |
| Published: |
Scandinavian University Press
2024-06-01
|
| Series: | Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.idunn.no/doi/10.18261/nft.59.1-2.3 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Kriser og kriger – er det bruk for oss
nå?
by: Gunnar M. Sørbø
Published: (2017-01-01) -
The Unbearable Weight of Simplicity in Theory Choice
by: Deiver Vinícius de Melo
Published: (2024-12-01) -
A new teaching methodology in Bioethics: experience of the application of portfolios with medical students
by: Graziela Moreto
Published: (2010-07-01) -
A Critical Analysis of the Relationship between"Meta-Philosophy" and "Methodology"A Critique on the Book The End of the Philosophy of Religion
by: Malek Shojaijashughani, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
I etikkens tjeneste
by: Henrik Syse, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)