Qui a dit racisme systémique ?
In this article, we examine the implications of using (or not using) the discursive formula “systemic racism” in a research-intervention project under a diversity management initiative at a Canadian financial institution. To this end, we discuss the term semantic negotiation, defined as a transactio...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
Université Laval
2024-12-01
|
Series: | Communication |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/communication/19354 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841553203391365120 |
---|---|
author | Stacey Caceus Consuelo Vásquez |
author_facet | Stacey Caceus Consuelo Vásquez |
author_sort | Stacey Caceus |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In this article, we examine the implications of using (or not using) the discursive formula “systemic racism” in a research-intervention project under a diversity management initiative at a Canadian financial institution. To this end, we discuss the term semantic negotiation, defined as a transactional process of relating a signifier to a signified, generating varied and often contradictory meanings, with the aim of influencing interpretations and courses of action in a desired direction. Starting with the research mandate negotiation process, the article shows that semantic negotiation is a strategy used by both the researcher-intervenor and her partners to find common ground on which to pursue the research-intervention project. Compromises on both sides, as well as a ban on the use of potentially controversial terms, lead to a form of neutralization of systemic racism, reinforcing the organizational whiteness of diversity management programs. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-818200600dad4672a9d2d7cfb84afb52 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1189-3788 1920-7344 |
language | fra |
publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
publisher | Université Laval |
record_format | Article |
series | Communication |
spelling | doaj-art-818200600dad4672a9d2d7cfb84afb522025-01-09T11:27:44ZfraUniversité LavalCommunication1189-37881920-73442024-12-0141210.4000/12yezQui a dit racisme systémique ?Stacey CaceusConsuelo VásquezIn this article, we examine the implications of using (or not using) the discursive formula “systemic racism” in a research-intervention project under a diversity management initiative at a Canadian financial institution. To this end, we discuss the term semantic negotiation, defined as a transactional process of relating a signifier to a signified, generating varied and often contradictory meanings, with the aim of influencing interpretations and courses of action in a desired direction. Starting with the research mandate negotiation process, the article shows that semantic negotiation is a strategy used by both the researcher-intervenor and her partners to find common ground on which to pursue the research-intervention project. Compromises on both sides, as well as a ban on the use of potentially controversial terms, lead to a form of neutralization of systemic racism, reinforcing the organizational whiteness of diversity management programs.https://journals.openedition.org/communication/19354systemic racismdiversity managementEDIresearch-interventionsemantic negotiation |
spellingShingle | Stacey Caceus Consuelo Vásquez Qui a dit racisme systémique ? Communication systemic racism diversity management EDI research-intervention semantic negotiation |
title | Qui a dit racisme systémique ? |
title_full | Qui a dit racisme systémique ? |
title_fullStr | Qui a dit racisme systémique ? |
title_full_unstemmed | Qui a dit racisme systémique ? |
title_short | Qui a dit racisme systémique ? |
title_sort | qui a dit racisme systemique |
topic | systemic racism diversity management EDI research-intervention semantic negotiation |
url | https://journals.openedition.org/communication/19354 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT staceycaceus quiaditracismesystemique AT consuelovasquez quiaditracismesystemique |