Qui a dit racisme systémique ?

In this article, we examine the implications of using (or not using) the discursive formula “systemic racism” in a research-intervention project under a diversity management initiative at a Canadian financial institution. To this end, we discuss the term semantic negotiation, defined as a transactio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stacey Caceus, Consuelo Vásquez
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Université Laval 2024-12-01
Series:Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/communication/19354
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841553203391365120
author Stacey Caceus
Consuelo Vásquez
author_facet Stacey Caceus
Consuelo Vásquez
author_sort Stacey Caceus
collection DOAJ
description In this article, we examine the implications of using (or not using) the discursive formula “systemic racism” in a research-intervention project under a diversity management initiative at a Canadian financial institution. To this end, we discuss the term semantic negotiation, defined as a transactional process of relating a signifier to a signified, generating varied and often contradictory meanings, with the aim of influencing interpretations and courses of action in a desired direction. Starting with the research mandate negotiation process, the article shows that semantic negotiation is a strategy used by both the researcher-intervenor and her partners to find common ground on which to pursue the research-intervention project. Compromises on both sides, as well as a ban on the use of potentially controversial terms, lead to a form of neutralization of systemic racism, reinforcing the organizational whiteness of diversity management programs.
format Article
id doaj-art-818200600dad4672a9d2d7cfb84afb52
institution Kabale University
issn 1189-3788
1920-7344
language fra
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Université Laval
record_format Article
series Communication
spelling doaj-art-818200600dad4672a9d2d7cfb84afb522025-01-09T11:27:44ZfraUniversité LavalCommunication1189-37881920-73442024-12-0141210.4000/12yezQui a dit racisme systémique ?Stacey CaceusConsuelo VásquezIn this article, we examine the implications of using (or not using) the discursive formula “systemic racism” in a research-intervention project under a diversity management initiative at a Canadian financial institution. To this end, we discuss the term semantic negotiation, defined as a transactional process of relating a signifier to a signified, generating varied and often contradictory meanings, with the aim of influencing interpretations and courses of action in a desired direction. Starting with the research mandate negotiation process, the article shows that semantic negotiation is a strategy used by both the researcher-intervenor and her partners to find common ground on which to pursue the research-intervention project. Compromises on both sides, as well as a ban on the use of potentially controversial terms, lead to a form of neutralization of systemic racism, reinforcing the organizational whiteness of diversity management programs.https://journals.openedition.org/communication/19354systemic racismdiversity managementEDIresearch-interventionsemantic negotiation
spellingShingle Stacey Caceus
Consuelo Vásquez
Qui a dit racisme systémique ?
Communication
systemic racism
diversity management
EDI
research-intervention
semantic negotiation
title Qui a dit racisme systémique ?
title_full Qui a dit racisme systémique ?
title_fullStr Qui a dit racisme systémique ?
title_full_unstemmed Qui a dit racisme systémique ?
title_short Qui a dit racisme systémique ?
title_sort qui a dit racisme systemique
topic systemic racism
diversity management
EDI
research-intervention
semantic negotiation
url https://journals.openedition.org/communication/19354
work_keys_str_mv AT staceycaceus quiaditracismesystemique
AT consuelovasquez quiaditracismesystemique