‘We are not trained to do clinical work’: security staff providing physical restraint for NGT feeding in English paediatric wards—a qualitative multi-informant study

Objective To gain insights into the experience, and impact, of using security staff to facilitate physical restraints for nasogastric tube feeding.Design A cross-sectional design using 39 individual interviews, three online focus groups and three written submissions involving young people with lived...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dasha Nicholls, Jacinta Tan, Sarah Fuller, Emerie Sheridan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2024-12-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/12/e085955.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536728793350144
author Dasha Nicholls
Jacinta Tan
Sarah Fuller
Emerie Sheridan
author_facet Dasha Nicholls
Jacinta Tan
Sarah Fuller
Emerie Sheridan
author_sort Dasha Nicholls
collection DOAJ
description Objective To gain insights into the experience, and impact, of using security staff to facilitate physical restraints for nasogastric tube feeding.Design A cross-sectional design using 39 individual interviews, three online focus groups and three written submissions involving young people with lived experience (PWLE), parents/carers, paediatric staff and security staff involved in nasogastric feeding under restraint in paediatric settings in England. Qualitative semistructured interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed.Participants 53 individuals participated: seven security staff (all men); nine PWLE who experienced the intervention between the ages of 9 and 17 (all female); 20 parents (15 mothers, 5 fathers) and 20 paediatric staff (5 men, 15 women).Results Regarding the involvement of security staff, participants spoke in relation to two primary themes (1) short-term impact and (2) long-term impact. Short-term themes included that the intervention felt inappropriate and traumatic while also recognising its lifesaving nature and the fact that involving security guards preserved positive relationships with nursing staff. Longer-term themes included the development of trauma symptoms, while also acknowledging the skill development and improved professional relationships that could result from delivering the intervention.Conclusions This lifesaving clinical intervention can negatively impact security staff as much as the patient, parents/carers and paediatric staff. A prebrief and debrief should be seen as part of the ‘process’. Further research is needed to better understand what else can mitigate negative impacts.
format Article
id doaj-art-7ef66f83de4e4b38ac73d2d091ee90df
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-7ef66f83de4e4b38ac73d2d091ee90df2025-01-14T11:30:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552024-12-01141210.1136/bmjopen-2024-085955‘We are not trained to do clinical work’: security staff providing physical restraint for NGT feeding in English paediatric wards—a qualitative multi-informant studyDasha Nicholls0Jacinta Tan1Sarah Fuller2Emerie Sheridan31 Imperial College London, London, UK1 Imperial College London, London, UK1 Imperial College London, London, UK1 Imperial College London, London, UKObjective To gain insights into the experience, and impact, of using security staff to facilitate physical restraints for nasogastric tube feeding.Design A cross-sectional design using 39 individual interviews, three online focus groups and three written submissions involving young people with lived experience (PWLE), parents/carers, paediatric staff and security staff involved in nasogastric feeding under restraint in paediatric settings in England. Qualitative semistructured interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed.Participants 53 individuals participated: seven security staff (all men); nine PWLE who experienced the intervention between the ages of 9 and 17 (all female); 20 parents (15 mothers, 5 fathers) and 20 paediatric staff (5 men, 15 women).Results Regarding the involvement of security staff, participants spoke in relation to two primary themes (1) short-term impact and (2) long-term impact. Short-term themes included that the intervention felt inappropriate and traumatic while also recognising its lifesaving nature and the fact that involving security guards preserved positive relationships with nursing staff. Longer-term themes included the development of trauma symptoms, while also acknowledging the skill development and improved professional relationships that could result from delivering the intervention.Conclusions This lifesaving clinical intervention can negatively impact security staff as much as the patient, parents/carers and paediatric staff. A prebrief and debrief should be seen as part of the ‘process’. Further research is needed to better understand what else can mitigate negative impacts.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/12/e085955.full
spellingShingle Dasha Nicholls
Jacinta Tan
Sarah Fuller
Emerie Sheridan
‘We are not trained to do clinical work’: security staff providing physical restraint for NGT feeding in English paediatric wards—a qualitative multi-informant study
BMJ Open
title ‘We are not trained to do clinical work’: security staff providing physical restraint for NGT feeding in English paediatric wards—a qualitative multi-informant study
title_full ‘We are not trained to do clinical work’: security staff providing physical restraint for NGT feeding in English paediatric wards—a qualitative multi-informant study
title_fullStr ‘We are not trained to do clinical work’: security staff providing physical restraint for NGT feeding in English paediatric wards—a qualitative multi-informant study
title_full_unstemmed ‘We are not trained to do clinical work’: security staff providing physical restraint for NGT feeding in English paediatric wards—a qualitative multi-informant study
title_short ‘We are not trained to do clinical work’: security staff providing physical restraint for NGT feeding in English paediatric wards—a qualitative multi-informant study
title_sort we are not trained to do clinical work security staff providing physical restraint for ngt feeding in english paediatric wards a qualitative multi informant study
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/12/e085955.full
work_keys_str_mv AT dashanicholls wearenottrainedtodoclinicalworksecuritystaffprovidingphysicalrestraintforngtfeedinginenglishpaediatricwardsaqualitativemultiinformantstudy
AT jacintatan wearenottrainedtodoclinicalworksecuritystaffprovidingphysicalrestraintforngtfeedinginenglishpaediatricwardsaqualitativemultiinformantstudy
AT sarahfuller wearenottrainedtodoclinicalworksecuritystaffprovidingphysicalrestraintforngtfeedinginenglishpaediatricwardsaqualitativemultiinformantstudy
AT emeriesheridan wearenottrainedtodoclinicalworksecuritystaffprovidingphysicalrestraintforngtfeedinginenglishpaediatricwardsaqualitativemultiinformantstudy