Criticism of Contributory Negligence in Contracts Law in Iran and America

When the obligee does not collaborate with the obligor based on good faith in any steps of the contract including formation and execution or even after contract breach and this causes or increases losses, then that situation gives rise to the concept of the fault of the injured party. Therefore, if...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: mozhdeh zafari, Morteza Shahbazinia, MEHRZAD ABDALI, Seyyed Elham-aldin Sharifi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shahr-e- Danesh Research And Study Institute of Law 2024-06-01
Series:پژوهشهای حقوقی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jlr.sdil.ac.ir/article_163971_f9d38c7744f06a940c8b1eaa6d0f1f74.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544677855068160
author mozhdeh zafari
Morteza Shahbazinia
MEHRZAD ABDALI
Seyyed Elham-aldin Sharifi
author_facet mozhdeh zafari
Morteza Shahbazinia
MEHRZAD ABDALI
Seyyed Elham-aldin Sharifi
author_sort mozhdeh zafari
collection DOAJ
description When the obligee does not collaborate with the obligor based on good faith in any steps of the contract including formation and execution or even after contract breach and this causes or increases losses, then that situation gives rise to the concept of the fault of the injured party. Therefore, if the obligee and the obligor jointly cause or increase losses, then the concept of contributory negligence, or comparative negligence according to the US legal system, should be considered. The present paper aims to conduct a comparative study on contributory negligence in contract law together with an analysis of relevant domestic and foreign opinions. It is concluded that in the US legal system, contributory negligence is usually dismissed in the field of contracts; but "reasonable reliance" and "predictability" have efficient similarities to the contributory negligence concept and this fact reveals traces of contributory negligence in the US legal system. However, in the Iranian legal system laws indirectly imply this concept and the presence of contributory negligence in the Iranian law can also be confirmed based on analogy, ascertainment, good faith, and purpose of law and the fact that this concept merely mentioned with regard to some laws, can be explained based on the Islamic prevalence rule (Qalabah).
format Article
id doaj-art-7e40d589b6b14b32aef8fbd6ef942fab
institution Kabale University
issn 1682-9220
2717-0020
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Shahr-e- Danesh Research And Study Institute of Law
record_format Article
series پژوهشهای حقوقی
spelling doaj-art-7e40d589b6b14b32aef8fbd6ef942fab2025-01-12T12:21:59ZengShahr-e- Danesh Research And Study Institute of Lawپژوهشهای حقوقی1682-92202717-00202024-06-01235743946410.48300/jlr.2022.350107.2113163971Criticism of Contributory Negligence in Contracts Law in Iran and Americamozhdeh zafari0Morteza Shahbazinia1MEHRZAD ABDALI2Seyyed Elham-aldin Sharifi3PhD Student in Private Law, Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.Associate Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.Associate Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.When the obligee does not collaborate with the obligor based on good faith in any steps of the contract including formation and execution or even after contract breach and this causes or increases losses, then that situation gives rise to the concept of the fault of the injured party. Therefore, if the obligee and the obligor jointly cause or increase losses, then the concept of contributory negligence, or comparative negligence according to the US legal system, should be considered. The present paper aims to conduct a comparative study on contributory negligence in contract law together with an analysis of relevant domestic and foreign opinions. It is concluded that in the US legal system, contributory negligence is usually dismissed in the field of contracts; but "reasonable reliance" and "predictability" have efficient similarities to the contributory negligence concept and this fact reveals traces of contributory negligence in the US legal system. However, in the Iranian legal system laws indirectly imply this concept and the presence of contributory negligence in the Iranian law can also be confirmed based on analogy, ascertainment, good faith, and purpose of law and the fact that this concept merely mentioned with regard to some laws, can be explained based on the Islamic prevalence rule (Qalabah).https://jlr.sdil.ac.ir/article_163971_f9d38c7744f06a940c8b1eaa6d0f1f74.pdfcontributory negligencemitigation of damagereasonable reliancepredictabilitycommitment to cooperation
spellingShingle mozhdeh zafari
Morteza Shahbazinia
MEHRZAD ABDALI
Seyyed Elham-aldin Sharifi
Criticism of Contributory Negligence in Contracts Law in Iran and America
پژوهشهای حقوقی
contributory negligence
mitigation of damage
reasonable reliance
predictability
commitment to cooperation
title Criticism of Contributory Negligence in Contracts Law in Iran and America
title_full Criticism of Contributory Negligence in Contracts Law in Iran and America
title_fullStr Criticism of Contributory Negligence in Contracts Law in Iran and America
title_full_unstemmed Criticism of Contributory Negligence in Contracts Law in Iran and America
title_short Criticism of Contributory Negligence in Contracts Law in Iran and America
title_sort criticism of contributory negligence in contracts law in iran and america
topic contributory negligence
mitigation of damage
reasonable reliance
predictability
commitment to cooperation
url https://jlr.sdil.ac.ir/article_163971_f9d38c7744f06a940c8b1eaa6d0f1f74.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mozhdehzafari criticismofcontributorynegligenceincontractslawiniranandamerica
AT mortezashahbazinia criticismofcontributorynegligenceincontractslawiniranandamerica
AT mehrzadabdali criticismofcontributorynegligenceincontractslawiniranandamerica
AT seyyedelhamaldinsharifi criticismofcontributorynegligenceincontractslawiniranandamerica