Multiple myeloma: retrospective assessment of routine thromboprophylaxis and utility of thrombotic risk scores

Background: The high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in multiple myeloma (MM) warrants primary thromboprophylaxis for most patients. Myeloma-specific thrombotic risk scores (TRSs), such as IMPEDE-VTE, SAVED, and PRISM, were developed to improve risk assessment and guide antithrombotic strategie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Omar Eduardo Fernandez-Vargas, Isabel Amezcua, Beatriz Cabello, Andrea Quintana Martinez, Ramiro Espinoza, Gabriela Cesarman-Maus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-10-01
Series:Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924002668
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846159469881327616
author Omar Eduardo Fernandez-Vargas
Isabel Amezcua
Beatriz Cabello
Andrea Quintana Martinez
Ramiro Espinoza
Gabriela Cesarman-Maus
author_facet Omar Eduardo Fernandez-Vargas
Isabel Amezcua
Beatriz Cabello
Andrea Quintana Martinez
Ramiro Espinoza
Gabriela Cesarman-Maus
author_sort Omar Eduardo Fernandez-Vargas
collection DOAJ
description Background: The high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in multiple myeloma (MM) warrants primary thromboprophylaxis for most patients. Myeloma-specific thrombotic risk scores (TRSs), such as IMPEDE-VTE, SAVED, and PRISM, were developed to improve risk assessment and guide antithrombotic strategies. Their performance is variable and has not yet been tested in Latin America. Objectives: We aimed to assess the use of primary thromboprophylaxis, the incidence of VTE and bleeding events, and the effectiveness of TRSs in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center study. Cumulative VTE rates and TRS performance were analyzed using survival and receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: The study included 250 newly diagnosed MM patients; the vast majority (98.6%) received aspirin as thromboprophylaxis. VTE occurred in 8% within the initial 6 months, increasing to 14.8% over a median follow-up of 19 months. High rates of major bleeding (4.8%) and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (4.4%) events were documented. A minimal proportion (0.8%, 0.5%, and 1.2%) of patients were classified as low risk by IMPEDE-VTE, PRISM, and SAVED scores, respectively. Only IMPEDE-VTE exhibited a trend for distinguishing between intermediate-risk (7.14%) and high-risk (13.2%) groups (P = .09). PRISM and SAVED scores showed limited utility. VTE did not impact survival. Conclusion: Aspirin as primary thromboprophylaxis carries an unacceptable risk of VTE and bleeding in patients at intermediate or high thrombotic risk. The IMPEDE-VTE score performed best, although without reaching statistical significance. We confirm that VTE does not portend poor overall survival in MM.
format Article
id doaj-art-7da13d3ed32948e081b4f2f23b0e028c
institution Kabale University
issn 2475-0379
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
spelling doaj-art-7da13d3ed32948e081b4f2f23b0e028c2024-11-23T06:31:20ZengElsevierResearch and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis2475-03792024-10-0187102571Multiple myeloma: retrospective assessment of routine thromboprophylaxis and utility of thrombotic risk scoresOmar Eduardo Fernandez-Vargas0Isabel Amezcua1Beatriz Cabello2Andrea Quintana Martinez3Ramiro Espinoza4Gabriela Cesarman-Maus5Department of Hematology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, MexicoDepartment of Hematology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, MexicoDepartment of Hematology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, MexicoDepartment of Hematology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, MexicoDepartment of Hematology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, MexicoCorrespondence Gabriela Cesarman-Maus, Hematology Department, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, San Frenando 22, Tlalpan, Mexico City, CDMX 14080, Mexico.; Department of Hematology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, MexicoBackground: The high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in multiple myeloma (MM) warrants primary thromboprophylaxis for most patients. Myeloma-specific thrombotic risk scores (TRSs), such as IMPEDE-VTE, SAVED, and PRISM, were developed to improve risk assessment and guide antithrombotic strategies. Their performance is variable and has not yet been tested in Latin America. Objectives: We aimed to assess the use of primary thromboprophylaxis, the incidence of VTE and bleeding events, and the effectiveness of TRSs in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center study. Cumulative VTE rates and TRS performance were analyzed using survival and receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: The study included 250 newly diagnosed MM patients; the vast majority (98.6%) received aspirin as thromboprophylaxis. VTE occurred in 8% within the initial 6 months, increasing to 14.8% over a median follow-up of 19 months. High rates of major bleeding (4.8%) and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (4.4%) events were documented. A minimal proportion (0.8%, 0.5%, and 1.2%) of patients were classified as low risk by IMPEDE-VTE, PRISM, and SAVED scores, respectively. Only IMPEDE-VTE exhibited a trend for distinguishing between intermediate-risk (7.14%) and high-risk (13.2%) groups (P = .09). PRISM and SAVED scores showed limited utility. VTE did not impact survival. Conclusion: Aspirin as primary thromboprophylaxis carries an unacceptable risk of VTE and bleeding in patients at intermediate or high thrombotic risk. The IMPEDE-VTE score performed best, although without reaching statistical significance. We confirm that VTE does not portend poor overall survival in MM.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924002668aspirinmultiple myelomaprophylaxisrisk factorsvenous thromboembolism
spellingShingle Omar Eduardo Fernandez-Vargas
Isabel Amezcua
Beatriz Cabello
Andrea Quintana Martinez
Ramiro Espinoza
Gabriela Cesarman-Maus
Multiple myeloma: retrospective assessment of routine thromboprophylaxis and utility of thrombotic risk scores
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
aspirin
multiple myeloma
prophylaxis
risk factors
venous thromboembolism
title Multiple myeloma: retrospective assessment of routine thromboprophylaxis and utility of thrombotic risk scores
title_full Multiple myeloma: retrospective assessment of routine thromboprophylaxis and utility of thrombotic risk scores
title_fullStr Multiple myeloma: retrospective assessment of routine thromboprophylaxis and utility of thrombotic risk scores
title_full_unstemmed Multiple myeloma: retrospective assessment of routine thromboprophylaxis and utility of thrombotic risk scores
title_short Multiple myeloma: retrospective assessment of routine thromboprophylaxis and utility of thrombotic risk scores
title_sort multiple myeloma retrospective assessment of routine thromboprophylaxis and utility of thrombotic risk scores
topic aspirin
multiple myeloma
prophylaxis
risk factors
venous thromboembolism
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924002668
work_keys_str_mv AT omareduardofernandezvargas multiplemyelomaretrospectiveassessmentofroutinethromboprophylaxisandutilityofthromboticriskscores
AT isabelamezcua multiplemyelomaretrospectiveassessmentofroutinethromboprophylaxisandutilityofthromboticriskscores
AT beatrizcabello multiplemyelomaretrospectiveassessmentofroutinethromboprophylaxisandutilityofthromboticriskscores
AT andreaquintanamartinez multiplemyelomaretrospectiveassessmentofroutinethromboprophylaxisandutilityofthromboticriskscores
AT ramiroespinoza multiplemyelomaretrospectiveassessmentofroutinethromboprophylaxisandutilityofthromboticriskscores
AT gabrielacesarmanmaus multiplemyelomaretrospectiveassessmentofroutinethromboprophylaxisandutilityofthromboticriskscores