Conceptul de istorie literară

This paper offers an overview on the concept of literary history: the presentation opens with the returning to two classic definitions of it and with the identification of its dual character, objective and subjective. In order to study the subject, revived after the 1990s, one must first clearly def...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ioana Mircea
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Editura Academiei Române 2015-12-01
Series:Revista de Istorie și Teorie Literară
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ritl.ro/pdf/2015/15_I_Mircea.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841560635855339520
author Ioana Mircea
author_facet Ioana Mircea
author_sort Ioana Mircea
collection DOAJ
description This paper offers an overview on the concept of literary history: the presentation opens with the returning to two classic definitions of it and with the identification of its dual character, objective and subjective. In order to study the subject, revived after the 1990s, one must first clearly define literary theory, critique, and history; decide whether they are complementary or contradictory; and see how literary science interacts with the concept. We can identify a hierarchy in which theory comes first, critique second and history last, and then examine the adaptation of dichotomies and the way in which literary history is perceived by various Romanian authors.
format Article
id doaj-art-7d79c3d3b44a41f88cc7058204a4b653
institution Kabale University
issn 0034-8392
3061-4201
language deu
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher Editura Academiei Române
record_format Article
series Revista de Istorie și Teorie Literară
spelling doaj-art-7d79c3d3b44a41f88cc7058204a4b6532025-01-03T20:02:18ZdeuEditura Academiei RomâneRevista de Istorie și Teorie Literară0034-83923061-42012015-12-0191-4287293Conceptul de istorie literarăIoana Mircea0Universitatea „Lucian Blaga” din SibiuThis paper offers an overview on the concept of literary history: the presentation opens with the returning to two classic definitions of it and with the identification of its dual character, objective and subjective. In order to study the subject, revived after the 1990s, one must first clearly define literary theory, critique, and history; decide whether they are complementary or contradictory; and see how literary science interacts with the concept. We can identify a hierarchy in which theory comes first, critique second and history last, and then examine the adaptation of dichotomies and the way in which literary history is perceived by various Romanian authors.https://ritl.ro/pdf/2015/15_I_Mircea.pdfdefinitiong. călinescurené wellekliterary theoryliterary critiquedichotomies
spellingShingle Ioana Mircea
Conceptul de istorie literară
Revista de Istorie și Teorie Literară
definition
g. călinescu
rené wellek
literary theory
literary critique
dichotomies
title Conceptul de istorie literară
title_full Conceptul de istorie literară
title_fullStr Conceptul de istorie literară
title_full_unstemmed Conceptul de istorie literară
title_short Conceptul de istorie literară
title_sort conceptul de istorie literara
topic definition
g. călinescu
rené wellek
literary theory
literary critique
dichotomies
url https://ritl.ro/pdf/2015/15_I_Mircea.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ioanamircea conceptuldeistorieliterara