Settling a conflict of interest in judicial and lawyer activity: general and specific issues (by the example of class proceedings)

Objective: to clarify the concept of “conflict of interest”, to identify the peculiarities of conflict of interest resolution in group proceedings, and to develop practical recommendations to prevent conflict of interest in judicial and advocacy activities.Methods: dialectical approach to cognition...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: O. S. Belosludtsev, I. V. Ginzburg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd. 2024-03-01
Series:Russian Journal of Economics and Law
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2516
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846116981293449216
author O. S. Belosludtsev
I. V. Ginzburg
author_facet O. S. Belosludtsev
I. V. Ginzburg
author_sort O. S. Belosludtsev
collection DOAJ
description Objective: to clarify the concept of “conflict of interest”, to identify the peculiarities of conflict of interest resolution in group proceedings, and to develop practical recommendations to prevent conflict of interest in judicial and advocacy activities.Methods: dialectical approach to cognition of social phenomena, allowing to analyze them in historical development and functioning in the context of the totality of objective and subjective factors, which predetermined the following research methods: formal-logical and comparative-legal.Results: the objective impossibility of legislatively stipulating all possible variants of conflicts of interest makes it necessary to resolve both “real” and “seeming” conflicts of interest directly by the law enforcer. The lack of appropriate rules and recommendations causes uncertainty regarding the presence (absence) of a judge’s conflict of interest. The article formulates the main signs of a conflict of interest: a) a contradiction between the personal (private) interests of a judge and the principles of justice; b) personal interest of a judge; c) financial interest of a judge; d) the existence of a legal fact confirming the conflict of interest; e) the need to inform the persons involved in the case about the conflict of interest; f) the burden of proving the grounds for recusal lies with the applicant. In addition, the author provides a legal assessment of the measures of settling a conflict of interest in judicial activity, outlines approaches and proposals to improve the institute of conflict of interest settlement in judicial and advocacy activities, and reveals the peculiarities of conflict of interest settlement in group proceedings.Scientific novelty: the article presents a comprehensive study of the institute of conflict of interest in judicial and advocacy activities, in which the main features of conflict of interest in judicial and advocacy activities are identified, the peculiarities of conflict of interest settlement in proceedings for the protection of rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons are determined, a comparative legal analysis of foreign and Russian law enforcement practice on the conflicts of interest settlement is carried out.Practical significance: the main conclusions of the article can be used in law-making activities to improve the legal regulation of the conflict of interest institute. The formulated provisions and conclusions can be used in lectures, seminars, preparation of methodological materials on legal disciplines.
format Article
id doaj-art-7b092c1e70244e1f9548c9e7dae477f7
institution Kabale University
issn 2782-2923
language English
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Tatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd.
record_format Article
series Russian Journal of Economics and Law
spelling doaj-art-7b092c1e70244e1f9548c9e7dae477f72024-12-18T11:47:07ZengTatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd.Russian Journal of Economics and Law2782-29232024-03-0118110512010.21202/2782-2923.2024.1.105-1202286Settling a conflict of interest in judicial and lawyer activity: general and specific issues (by the example of class proceedings)O. S. Belosludtsev0I. V. Ginzburg1Mordovia State University named after N. P. OgarevMordovia State University named after N. P. OgarevObjective: to clarify the concept of “conflict of interest”, to identify the peculiarities of conflict of interest resolution in group proceedings, and to develop practical recommendations to prevent conflict of interest in judicial and advocacy activities.Methods: dialectical approach to cognition of social phenomena, allowing to analyze them in historical development and functioning in the context of the totality of objective and subjective factors, which predetermined the following research methods: formal-logical and comparative-legal.Results: the objective impossibility of legislatively stipulating all possible variants of conflicts of interest makes it necessary to resolve both “real” and “seeming” conflicts of interest directly by the law enforcer. The lack of appropriate rules and recommendations causes uncertainty regarding the presence (absence) of a judge’s conflict of interest. The article formulates the main signs of a conflict of interest: a) a contradiction between the personal (private) interests of a judge and the principles of justice; b) personal interest of a judge; c) financial interest of a judge; d) the existence of a legal fact confirming the conflict of interest; e) the need to inform the persons involved in the case about the conflict of interest; f) the burden of proving the grounds for recusal lies with the applicant. In addition, the author provides a legal assessment of the measures of settling a conflict of interest in judicial activity, outlines approaches and proposals to improve the institute of conflict of interest settlement in judicial and advocacy activities, and reveals the peculiarities of conflict of interest settlement in group proceedings.Scientific novelty: the article presents a comprehensive study of the institute of conflict of interest in judicial and advocacy activities, in which the main features of conflict of interest in judicial and advocacy activities are identified, the peculiarities of conflict of interest settlement in proceedings for the protection of rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons are determined, a comparative legal analysis of foreign and Russian law enforcement practice on the conflicts of interest settlement is carried out.Practical significance: the main conclusions of the article can be used in law-making activities to improve the legal regulation of the conflict of interest institute. The formulated provisions and conclusions can be used in lectures, seminars, preparation of methodological materials on legal disciplines.https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2516conflict of interestjudicial activityrecusal of a judgeadvocacyfiduciary dutiesgroup proceedings
spellingShingle O. S. Belosludtsev
I. V. Ginzburg
Settling a conflict of interest in judicial and lawyer activity: general and specific issues (by the example of class proceedings)
Russian Journal of Economics and Law
conflict of interest
judicial activity
recusal of a judge
advocacy
fiduciary duties
group proceedings
title Settling a conflict of interest in judicial and lawyer activity: general and specific issues (by the example of class proceedings)
title_full Settling a conflict of interest in judicial and lawyer activity: general and specific issues (by the example of class proceedings)
title_fullStr Settling a conflict of interest in judicial and lawyer activity: general and specific issues (by the example of class proceedings)
title_full_unstemmed Settling a conflict of interest in judicial and lawyer activity: general and specific issues (by the example of class proceedings)
title_short Settling a conflict of interest in judicial and lawyer activity: general and specific issues (by the example of class proceedings)
title_sort settling a conflict of interest in judicial and lawyer activity general and specific issues by the example of class proceedings
topic conflict of interest
judicial activity
recusal of a judge
advocacy
fiduciary duties
group proceedings
url https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2516
work_keys_str_mv AT osbelosludtsev settlingaconflictofinterestinjudicialandlawyeractivitygeneralandspecificissuesbytheexampleofclassproceedings
AT ivginzburg settlingaconflictofinterestinjudicialandlawyeractivitygeneralandspecificissuesbytheexampleofclassproceedings