Harmonising dawn raids in a global village: the ECN+ directive and negotiating legal certainty within fragmented european administrative procedure

Administrative procedure remains largely unharmonized in the European Union. One area where the divergent national procedures are particularly visible are unannounced inspections or ‘dawn raids’. They are carried out by national competition authorities to enforce both national competition laws and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Riina Autio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Católica Editora 2022-11-01
Series:Market and Competition Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/11484
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841563920987324416
author Riina Autio
author_facet Riina Autio
author_sort Riina Autio
collection DOAJ
description Administrative procedure remains largely unharmonized in the European Union. One area where the divergent national procedures are particularly visible are unannounced inspections or ‘dawn raids’. They are carried out by national competition authorities to enforce both national competition laws and the corresponding EU provisions, notably Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Provisions that are similar or even identical are thus being enforced under different procedural rules within the Union. Minimum harmonisation of competition law enforcement is underway with Directive 2019/1 or “ECN+”, as it became known in the early stages of the work towards the actual Directive. This article looks at different views to harmonisation and uneven enforcement and public statements from six EU Member States about the national amendments to implement Directive 2019/1. Dawn raids are always a balancing act between the public interest in uncovering competition infringements and fundamental and human rights, such as the right of defence. This article argues fragmentation poses a threat to legal certainty and does so in an area that routinely overlaps with fundamental and human rights. What is more, the ECN+ Directive may not level the playing field as intended. The current harmonisation efforts may, instead, carry a risk of merely shifting the existing imbalance to other areas of enforcement.
format Article
id doaj-art-78c2c147b5974888ae4e38b17a4e0c52
institution Kabale University
issn 2184-0008
language English
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Universidade Católica Editora
record_format Article
series Market and Competition Law Review
spelling doaj-art-78c2c147b5974888ae4e38b17a4e0c522025-01-02T23:23:26ZengUniversidade Católica EditoraMarket and Competition Law Review2184-00082022-11-016210.34632/mclawreview.2022.11484Harmonising dawn raids in a global village: the ECN+ directive and negotiating legal certainty within fragmented european administrative procedureRiina Autio0University of Helsinki, Faculty of Law Administrative procedure remains largely unharmonized in the European Union. One area where the divergent national procedures are particularly visible are unannounced inspections or ‘dawn raids’. They are carried out by national competition authorities to enforce both national competition laws and the corresponding EU provisions, notably Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Provisions that are similar or even identical are thus being enforced under different procedural rules within the Union. Minimum harmonisation of competition law enforcement is underway with Directive 2019/1 or “ECN+”, as it became known in the early stages of the work towards the actual Directive. This article looks at different views to harmonisation and uneven enforcement and public statements from six EU Member States about the national amendments to implement Directive 2019/1. Dawn raids are always a balancing act between the public interest in uncovering competition infringements and fundamental and human rights, such as the right of defence. This article argues fragmentation poses a threat to legal certainty and does so in an area that routinely overlaps with fundamental and human rights. What is more, the ECN+ Directive may not level the playing field as intended. The current harmonisation efforts may, instead, carry a risk of merely shifting the existing imbalance to other areas of enforcement. https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/11484Administrative procedureDawn raidsHarmonisationECN Fragmentation
spellingShingle Riina Autio
Harmonising dawn raids in a global village: the ECN+ directive and negotiating legal certainty within fragmented european administrative procedure
Market and Competition Law Review
Administrative procedure
Dawn raids
Harmonisation
ECN
Fragmentation
title Harmonising dawn raids in a global village: the ECN+ directive and negotiating legal certainty within fragmented european administrative procedure
title_full Harmonising dawn raids in a global village: the ECN+ directive and negotiating legal certainty within fragmented european administrative procedure
title_fullStr Harmonising dawn raids in a global village: the ECN+ directive and negotiating legal certainty within fragmented european administrative procedure
title_full_unstemmed Harmonising dawn raids in a global village: the ECN+ directive and negotiating legal certainty within fragmented european administrative procedure
title_short Harmonising dawn raids in a global village: the ECN+ directive and negotiating legal certainty within fragmented european administrative procedure
title_sort harmonising dawn raids in a global village the ecn directive and negotiating legal certainty within fragmented european administrative procedure
topic Administrative procedure
Dawn raids
Harmonisation
ECN
Fragmentation
url https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/11484
work_keys_str_mv AT riinaautio harmonisingdawnraidsinaglobalvillagetheecndirectiveandnegotiatinglegalcertaintywithinfragmentedeuropeanadministrativeprocedure