A new approach for increasing graduate students’ science communication capacity and confidence

There is an increasing demand for emerging scientists to improve their ability to communicate with public audiences, yet little research investigates the effectiveness of science communication training for graduate students. We responded to this need by developing SciWrite@URI—an interdisciplinary m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erin R. Harrington, Scott R. McWilliams, Nancy E. Karraker, Caroline Gottschalk Druschke, Jenna Morton-Aiken, Elaine Finan, Ingrid E. Lofgren
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2024-12-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/18594.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846111981350682624
author Erin R. Harrington
Scott R. McWilliams
Nancy E. Karraker
Caroline Gottschalk Druschke
Jenna Morton-Aiken
Elaine Finan
Ingrid E. Lofgren
author_facet Erin R. Harrington
Scott R. McWilliams
Nancy E. Karraker
Caroline Gottschalk Druschke
Jenna Morton-Aiken
Elaine Finan
Ingrid E. Lofgren
author_sort Erin R. Harrington
collection DOAJ
description There is an increasing demand for emerging scientists to improve their ability to communicate with public audiences, yet little research investigates the effectiveness of science communication training for graduate students. We responded to this need by developing SciWrite@URI—an interdisciplinary model for science graduate students designed around three learning outcomes based on tenets from the field of writing and rhetoric—habitual writing, multiple genres, and frequent review. SciWrite students completed courses and a science communication internship, attended writing workshops, and became tutors at a newly established Graduate Writing Center. After 2 years of training, students more frequently wrote multiple drafts and engaged in peer review, increased their confidence as writers, and decreased their apprehension about writing. We conclude the tenets of the SciWrite program helped students improve as science communicators, and we make suggestions for effective ways graduate departments and training programs might implement and build on our model.
format Article
id doaj-art-78b1fefdbd294088976e7c20f5ddb1bc
institution Kabale University
issn 2167-8359
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj-art-78b1fefdbd294088976e7c20f5ddb1bc2024-12-22T15:05:08ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592024-12-0112e1859410.7717/peerj.18594A new approach for increasing graduate students’ science communication capacity and confidenceErin R. Harrington0Scott R. McWilliams1Nancy E. Karraker2Caroline Gottschalk Druschke3Jenna Morton-Aiken4Elaine Finan5Ingrid E. Lofgren6Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USADepartment of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USADepartment of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USADepartment of English, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USADepartment of English, Brown University, Providence, RI, USAOffice for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USADepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USAThere is an increasing demand for emerging scientists to improve their ability to communicate with public audiences, yet little research investigates the effectiveness of science communication training for graduate students. We responded to this need by developing SciWrite@URI—an interdisciplinary model for science graduate students designed around three learning outcomes based on tenets from the field of writing and rhetoric—habitual writing, multiple genres, and frequent review. SciWrite students completed courses and a science communication internship, attended writing workshops, and became tutors at a newly established Graduate Writing Center. After 2 years of training, students more frequently wrote multiple drafts and engaged in peer review, increased their confidence as writers, and decreased their apprehension about writing. We conclude the tenets of the SciWrite program helped students improve as science communicators, and we make suggestions for effective ways graduate departments and training programs might implement and build on our model.https://peerj.com/articles/18594.pdfScience communicationSTEMGraduate trainingProgram assessmentScience writingSciWrite
spellingShingle Erin R. Harrington
Scott R. McWilliams
Nancy E. Karraker
Caroline Gottschalk Druschke
Jenna Morton-Aiken
Elaine Finan
Ingrid E. Lofgren
A new approach for increasing graduate students’ science communication capacity and confidence
PeerJ
Science communication
STEM
Graduate training
Program assessment
Science writing
SciWrite
title A new approach for increasing graduate students’ science communication capacity and confidence
title_full A new approach for increasing graduate students’ science communication capacity and confidence
title_fullStr A new approach for increasing graduate students’ science communication capacity and confidence
title_full_unstemmed A new approach for increasing graduate students’ science communication capacity and confidence
title_short A new approach for increasing graduate students’ science communication capacity and confidence
title_sort new approach for increasing graduate students science communication capacity and confidence
topic Science communication
STEM
Graduate training
Program assessment
Science writing
SciWrite
url https://peerj.com/articles/18594.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT erinrharrington anewapproachforincreasinggraduatestudentssciencecommunicationcapacityandconfidence
AT scottrmcwilliams anewapproachforincreasinggraduatestudentssciencecommunicationcapacityandconfidence
AT nancyekarraker anewapproachforincreasinggraduatestudentssciencecommunicationcapacityandconfidence
AT carolinegottschalkdruschke anewapproachforincreasinggraduatestudentssciencecommunicationcapacityandconfidence
AT jennamortonaiken anewapproachforincreasinggraduatestudentssciencecommunicationcapacityandconfidence
AT elainefinan anewapproachforincreasinggraduatestudentssciencecommunicationcapacityandconfidence
AT ingridelofgren anewapproachforincreasinggraduatestudentssciencecommunicationcapacityandconfidence
AT erinrharrington newapproachforincreasinggraduatestudentssciencecommunicationcapacityandconfidence
AT scottrmcwilliams newapproachforincreasinggraduatestudentssciencecommunicationcapacityandconfidence
AT nancyekarraker newapproachforincreasinggraduatestudentssciencecommunicationcapacityandconfidence
AT carolinegottschalkdruschke newapproachforincreasinggraduatestudentssciencecommunicationcapacityandconfidence
AT jennamortonaiken newapproachforincreasinggraduatestudentssciencecommunicationcapacityandconfidence
AT elainefinan newapproachforincreasinggraduatestudentssciencecommunicationcapacityandconfidence
AT ingridelofgren newapproachforincreasinggraduatestudentssciencecommunicationcapacityandconfidence