Taphonomic and ecological insights from conspecific bite marks on Otodus megalodon teeth

Although there is now good representation of shark-bitten bone in the fossil record, shark-bitten shark teeth are still exceedingly rare. A relatively small number of teeth of the Neogene megatooth shark Otodus megalodon (Otodontidae) preserve surface markings that were made when struck by the serra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephen J. Godfrey, Mark Bennett, Victor J. Perez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Paleobiology PAS 2024-12-01
Series:Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
Online Access:https://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app69/app011882024.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841527516381052928
author Stephen J. Godfrey
Mark Bennett
Victor J. Perez
author_facet Stephen J. Godfrey
Mark Bennett
Victor J. Perez
author_sort Stephen J. Godfrey
collection DOAJ
description Although there is now good representation of shark-bitten bone in the fossil record, shark-bitten shark teeth are still exceedingly rare. A relatively small number of teeth of the Neogene megatooth shark Otodus megalodon (Otodontidae) preserve surface markings that were made when struck by the serrated cutting edge of another O. megalodon tooth. The serration marks are consistent with those of the ichnotaxon Knethichnus parallelum. That these shallowly penetrating surface trace fossils were made as one O. megalodon tooth struck another is confirmed by the preservation of fine parallel gouges made when the serrated cutting edge of one tooth impacted and raked the surface of the receiving tooth. The K. parallelum marks on O. megalodon teeth could have been unintentionally self-inflicted, the result of one tooth striking another in the opposing jaw during forceful occlusion, collateral damage from feeding, or aggressive O. megalodon- on-O. megalodon facial biting (i.e., either from active predatory cannibalism, a feeding frenzy during scavenging, or as a result of a territorial dispute to establish a feeding hierarchy).
format Article
id doaj-art-76d0ebd7e5d447488f38f43006182f63
institution Kabale University
issn 1732-2421
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Institute of Paleobiology PAS
record_format Article
series Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
spelling doaj-art-76d0ebd7e5d447488f38f43006182f632025-01-15T14:11:58ZengInstitute of Paleobiology PASActa Palaeontologica Polonica1732-24212024-12-016947313610.4202/app.01188.2024Taphonomic and ecological insights from conspecific bite marks on Otodus megalodon teethStephen J. Godfrey0Mark Bennett1Victor J. Perez2Maryland Paleontology Collections and Research Center, Calvert Marine Museum, P.O. Box 97, Solomons, Maryland, 20688 USA. Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, 20013-7012 USA. Vertebrate Paleontology, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California, 90007 USA.Maryland Paleontology Collections and Research Center, Calvert Marine Museum, P.O. Box 97, Solomons, Maryland, 20688 USA.St. Mary’s College of Maryland, St. Mary’s City, Maryland, 20686 USA. Maryland Paleontology Collections and Research Center, Calvert Marine Museum, P.O. Box 97, Solomons, Maryland, 20688 USA.Although there is now good representation of shark-bitten bone in the fossil record, shark-bitten shark teeth are still exceedingly rare. A relatively small number of teeth of the Neogene megatooth shark Otodus megalodon (Otodontidae) preserve surface markings that were made when struck by the serrated cutting edge of another O. megalodon tooth. The serration marks are consistent with those of the ichnotaxon Knethichnus parallelum. That these shallowly penetrating surface trace fossils were made as one O. megalodon tooth struck another is confirmed by the preservation of fine parallel gouges made when the serrated cutting edge of one tooth impacted and raked the surface of the receiving tooth. The K. parallelum marks on O. megalodon teeth could have been unintentionally self-inflicted, the result of one tooth striking another in the opposing jaw during forceful occlusion, collateral damage from feeding, or aggressive O. megalodon- on-O. megalodon facial biting (i.e., either from active predatory cannibalism, a feeding frenzy during scavenging, or as a result of a territorial dispute to establish a feeding hierarchy).https://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app69/app011882024.pdf
spellingShingle Stephen J. Godfrey
Mark Bennett
Victor J. Perez
Taphonomic and ecological insights from conspecific bite marks on Otodus megalodon teeth
Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
title Taphonomic and ecological insights from conspecific bite marks on Otodus megalodon teeth
title_full Taphonomic and ecological insights from conspecific bite marks on Otodus megalodon teeth
title_fullStr Taphonomic and ecological insights from conspecific bite marks on Otodus megalodon teeth
title_full_unstemmed Taphonomic and ecological insights from conspecific bite marks on Otodus megalodon teeth
title_short Taphonomic and ecological insights from conspecific bite marks on Otodus megalodon teeth
title_sort taphonomic and ecological insights from conspecific bite marks on otodus megalodon teeth
url https://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app69/app011882024.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenjgodfrey taphonomicandecologicalinsightsfromconspecificbitemarksonotodusmegalodonteeth
AT markbennett taphonomicandecologicalinsightsfromconspecificbitemarksonotodusmegalodonteeth
AT victorjperez taphonomicandecologicalinsightsfromconspecificbitemarksonotodusmegalodonteeth