The effectiveness of oral irrigators on periodontal health status and oral hygiene of orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background An Oral irrigator, known as a dental waterjet (DWJ), is an adjunctive oral hygiene tool to remove dental plaque. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of oral irrigators on orthodontic patients’ oral hygiene and periodontal status. Methods A compr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zahra Zarei, Maryam Yazdi, Leila Sadeghalbanaei, Shabnam Tahamtan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-12-01
Series:BMC Oral Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05255-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846136772168253440
author Zahra Zarei
Maryam Yazdi
Leila Sadeghalbanaei
Shabnam Tahamtan
author_facet Zahra Zarei
Maryam Yazdi
Leila Sadeghalbanaei
Shabnam Tahamtan
author_sort Zahra Zarei
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background An Oral irrigator, known as a dental waterjet (DWJ), is an adjunctive oral hygiene tool to remove dental plaque. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of oral irrigators on orthodontic patients’ oral hygiene and periodontal status. Methods A comprehensive search was undertaken in five electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane) up to 1 May 2024. Clinical trials comparing DWJ with other adjunctive tools or no adjunctive in healthy orthodontic patients were included. The outcome was periodontal health condition measured by periodontal indexes. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Random- effects meta- analyses of mean differences (MD) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were conducted and the overall quality of evidence was evaluated by GRADE approach. Results Seven trials were included in the meta-analysis (Two with low, and others with unclear risk of bias). There was no statistically significant difference between automatic toothbrush (ATB) with DWJ and ATB alone in the gingival index (GI) (MD = 0.00; 95% CI -0.17- 0.18) (low quality of evidence). No statistically significant differences were found between (ATB + DWJ) and manual toothbrush (MTB) alone in the GI (MD= -0.11; 95% CI -0.31- 0.09) (very low quality of evidence). Also, no significant difference was detected between the two groups in the Plaque index (PI) (MD= -0.12; 95% CI -0.36- 0.11) (very low quality of evidence). There was no statistically significant difference between (MTB + DWJ) and MTB alone in the GI (MD= -0.06; 95% CI -0.16- 0.03) (very low quality of evidence). No statistically significant differences were revealed between the two groups in the PI (MD= -0.33; 95% CI -0.97- 0.32) (very low quality of evidence). No statistically significant improvements were found between these two groups in bleeding index (BI) (MD= -0.05; 95% CI − 0.12 − 0.01) (low quality of evidence). Conclusions Adding DWJ to either manual or automatic toothbrushes did not significantly enhance oral health of orthodontic patients. Orthodontists could recommend their patients to use either of these toothbrushes with or without DWJ. Further clinical trials are needed. Trial registration number The protocol of this study was registered on PROSPERO with the ID # CRD42023465849.
format Article
id doaj-art-72a03f2cd64f445385a99161b1a6691c
institution Kabale University
issn 1472-6831
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Oral Health
spelling doaj-art-72a03f2cd64f445385a99161b1a6691c2024-12-08T12:47:39ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312024-12-0124111910.1186/s12903-024-05255-wThe effectiveness of oral irrigators on periodontal health status and oral hygiene of orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysisZahra Zarei0Maryam Yazdi1Leila Sadeghalbanaei2Shabnam Tahamtan3Department of Orthodontics, Dental Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical SciencesChild Growth and Development Research Center, Research Institute for Primordial Prevention of Non-communicable Disease, Isfahan University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Orthodontics, Dental Materials Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Orthodontics, Dental Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical SciencesAbstract Background An Oral irrigator, known as a dental waterjet (DWJ), is an adjunctive oral hygiene tool to remove dental plaque. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of oral irrigators on orthodontic patients’ oral hygiene and periodontal status. Methods A comprehensive search was undertaken in five electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane) up to 1 May 2024. Clinical trials comparing DWJ with other adjunctive tools or no adjunctive in healthy orthodontic patients were included. The outcome was periodontal health condition measured by periodontal indexes. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Random- effects meta- analyses of mean differences (MD) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were conducted and the overall quality of evidence was evaluated by GRADE approach. Results Seven trials were included in the meta-analysis (Two with low, and others with unclear risk of bias). There was no statistically significant difference between automatic toothbrush (ATB) with DWJ and ATB alone in the gingival index (GI) (MD = 0.00; 95% CI -0.17- 0.18) (low quality of evidence). No statistically significant differences were found between (ATB + DWJ) and manual toothbrush (MTB) alone in the GI (MD= -0.11; 95% CI -0.31- 0.09) (very low quality of evidence). Also, no significant difference was detected between the two groups in the Plaque index (PI) (MD= -0.12; 95% CI -0.36- 0.11) (very low quality of evidence). There was no statistically significant difference between (MTB + DWJ) and MTB alone in the GI (MD= -0.06; 95% CI -0.16- 0.03) (very low quality of evidence). No statistically significant differences were revealed between the two groups in the PI (MD= -0.33; 95% CI -0.97- 0.32) (very low quality of evidence). No statistically significant improvements were found between these two groups in bleeding index (BI) (MD= -0.05; 95% CI − 0.12 − 0.01) (low quality of evidence). Conclusions Adding DWJ to either manual or automatic toothbrushes did not significantly enhance oral health of orthodontic patients. Orthodontists could recommend their patients to use either of these toothbrushes with or without DWJ. Further clinical trials are needed. Trial registration number The protocol of this study was registered on PROSPERO with the ID # CRD42023465849.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05255-wOrthodonticsPeriodontal IndexDental PlaqueMeta-analysisDental Water jet
spellingShingle Zahra Zarei
Maryam Yazdi
Leila Sadeghalbanaei
Shabnam Tahamtan
The effectiveness of oral irrigators on periodontal health status and oral hygiene of orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMC Oral Health
Orthodontics
Periodontal Index
Dental Plaque
Meta-analysis
Dental Water jet
title The effectiveness of oral irrigators on periodontal health status and oral hygiene of orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The effectiveness of oral irrigators on periodontal health status and oral hygiene of orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The effectiveness of oral irrigators on periodontal health status and oral hygiene of orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of oral irrigators on periodontal health status and oral hygiene of orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The effectiveness of oral irrigators on periodontal health status and oral hygiene of orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness of oral irrigators on periodontal health status and oral hygiene of orthodontic patients a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Orthodontics
Periodontal Index
Dental Plaque
Meta-analysis
Dental Water jet
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05255-w
work_keys_str_mv AT zahrazarei theeffectivenessoforalirrigatorsonperiodontalhealthstatusandoralhygieneoforthodonticpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maryamyazdi theeffectivenessoforalirrigatorsonperiodontalhealthstatusandoralhygieneoforthodonticpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leilasadeghalbanaei theeffectivenessoforalirrigatorsonperiodontalhealthstatusandoralhygieneoforthodonticpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shabnamtahamtan theeffectivenessoforalirrigatorsonperiodontalhealthstatusandoralhygieneoforthodonticpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zahrazarei effectivenessoforalirrigatorsonperiodontalhealthstatusandoralhygieneoforthodonticpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maryamyazdi effectivenessoforalirrigatorsonperiodontalhealthstatusandoralhygieneoforthodonticpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leilasadeghalbanaei effectivenessoforalirrigatorsonperiodontalhealthstatusandoralhygieneoforthodonticpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shabnamtahamtan effectivenessoforalirrigatorsonperiodontalhealthstatusandoralhygieneoforthodonticpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis