The importance of sub-meter-scale snow roughness on conductive heat flux of Arctic sea ice

The conductive heat flux through the snow and ice is a critical component of the mass and energy budgets in the Arctic sea ice system. We use high horizontal resolution (3–15 cm) measurements of snow topography to explore the impacts of sub-meter-scale snow surface roughness on heat flux as simulate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Clemens-Sewall, Chris Polashenski, Don Perovich, Melinda Anne Webster
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Glaciology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143023001053/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841526498482192384
author David Clemens-Sewall
Chris Polashenski
Don Perovich
Melinda Anne Webster
author_facet David Clemens-Sewall
Chris Polashenski
Don Perovich
Melinda Anne Webster
author_sort David Clemens-Sewall
collection DOAJ
description The conductive heat flux through the snow and ice is a critical component of the mass and energy budgets in the Arctic sea ice system. We use high horizontal resolution (3–15 cm) measurements of snow topography to explore the impacts of sub-meter-scale snow surface roughness on heat flux as simulated by the Finite Element method. Simulating horizontal heat flux in a variable snow cover modestly increases the total simulated heat flux. With horizontal heat flux, as opposed to simple 1D-vertical heat flux modeling, the simulated heat flux is 10% greater than that for uniform snow with the same mean snow thickness for a 31.5 × 21 m region of sea ice (the largest region we studied). Vertical-only (1D) heat flux simulates just a 6% increase for the same region. However, this is highly dependent on observation resolution. Had we measured the snow cover at 1 m horizontal spacing or greater, simulating horizontal heat flux would not have changed the net heat flux from that simulated with vertical-only heat flux. These findings suggest that measuring and modeling snow roughness at sub-meter horizontal scales may be necessary to accurately represent horizontal heat flux on level Arctic sea ice.
format Article
id doaj-art-71ca49cfeafe48209aeff053ffedae71
institution Kabale University
issn 0022-1430
1727-5652
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Glaciology
spelling doaj-art-71ca49cfeafe48209aeff053ffedae712025-01-16T21:46:38ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Glaciology0022-14301727-56522024-01-017010.1017/jog.2023.105The importance of sub-meter-scale snow roughness on conductive heat flux of Arctic sea iceDavid Clemens-Sewall0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-5256Chris Polashenski1Don Perovich2Melinda Anne Webster3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5976-9485Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USAThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, US Army Corps of Engineers, Hanover, NH, USAThayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USAPolar Science Center, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USAThe conductive heat flux through the snow and ice is a critical component of the mass and energy budgets in the Arctic sea ice system. We use high horizontal resolution (3–15 cm) measurements of snow topography to explore the impacts of sub-meter-scale snow surface roughness on heat flux as simulated by the Finite Element method. Simulating horizontal heat flux in a variable snow cover modestly increases the total simulated heat flux. With horizontal heat flux, as opposed to simple 1D-vertical heat flux modeling, the simulated heat flux is 10% greater than that for uniform snow with the same mean snow thickness for a 31.5 × 21 m region of sea ice (the largest region we studied). Vertical-only (1D) heat flux simulates just a 6% increase for the same region. However, this is highly dependent on observation resolution. Had we measured the snow cover at 1 m horizontal spacing or greater, simulating horizontal heat flux would not have changed the net heat flux from that simulated with vertical-only heat flux. These findings suggest that measuring and modeling snow roughness at sub-meter horizontal scales may be necessary to accurately represent horizontal heat flux on level Arctic sea ice.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143023001053/type/journal_articleLaser altimetrysnowsea icewind-blown snow
spellingShingle David Clemens-Sewall
Chris Polashenski
Don Perovich
Melinda Anne Webster
The importance of sub-meter-scale snow roughness on conductive heat flux of Arctic sea ice
Journal of Glaciology
Laser altimetry
snow
sea ice
wind-blown snow
title The importance of sub-meter-scale snow roughness on conductive heat flux of Arctic sea ice
title_full The importance of sub-meter-scale snow roughness on conductive heat flux of Arctic sea ice
title_fullStr The importance of sub-meter-scale snow roughness on conductive heat flux of Arctic sea ice
title_full_unstemmed The importance of sub-meter-scale snow roughness on conductive heat flux of Arctic sea ice
title_short The importance of sub-meter-scale snow roughness on conductive heat flux of Arctic sea ice
title_sort importance of sub meter scale snow roughness on conductive heat flux of arctic sea ice
topic Laser altimetry
snow
sea ice
wind-blown snow
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143023001053/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT davidclemenssewall theimportanceofsubmeterscalesnowroughnessonconductiveheatfluxofarcticseaice
AT chrispolashenski theimportanceofsubmeterscalesnowroughnessonconductiveheatfluxofarcticseaice
AT donperovich theimportanceofsubmeterscalesnowroughnessonconductiveheatfluxofarcticseaice
AT melindaannewebster theimportanceofsubmeterscalesnowroughnessonconductiveheatfluxofarcticseaice
AT davidclemenssewall importanceofsubmeterscalesnowroughnessonconductiveheatfluxofarcticseaice
AT chrispolashenski importanceofsubmeterscalesnowroughnessonconductiveheatfluxofarcticseaice
AT donperovich importanceofsubmeterscalesnowroughnessonconductiveheatfluxofarcticseaice
AT melindaannewebster importanceofsubmeterscalesnowroughnessonconductiveheatfluxofarcticseaice