Identifying Cladribine prescription pattern in MS: an Italian multicentre study

Background: Characterizing Cladribine tablets prescription pattern in daily clinical practice is crucial for optimizing multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment. Objectives: To describe efficacy, safety profile and new disease-modifying therapy (DMT) prescriptions following Cladribine treatment. Design: In...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aurora Zanghì, Roberta Fantozzi, Matteo Foschi, Elisabetta Signoriello, Matilde Inglese, Giacomo Lus, Diego Centonze, Andrea Surcinelli, Tommaso Sirito, Simona Bonavita, Carlo Avolio, Emanuele D’Amico
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2025-01-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864241304212
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Characterizing Cladribine tablets prescription pattern in daily clinical practice is crucial for optimizing multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment. Objectives: To describe efficacy, safety profile and new disease-modifying therapy (DMT) prescriptions following Cladribine treatment. Design: Independent retrospective cohort study in patients followed at six Italian MS centres. Methods: Patients diagnosed with relapsing MS (RMS) according to 2017 McDonald criteria, who initiated Cladribine between January 2019 and May 2023, were included. A generalized linear regression model was built for the outcome DMT after Cladribine course. Heatmaps were generated based on weighted pivot tables to visualize the proportion of patients requiring DMT post-Cladribine. Results: A total cohort of 352 patients was enrolled, 134 naïve to any DMT, 218 switchers from other DMTs. The last DMT was an injectable first-line DMT for 48 (22%) patients, oral first-line DMT for 141 (64.7%) patients, SP1 inhibitor-Fingolimod for 23 (10.6%) patients, and Natalizumab for 6 (2.7%) patients. Overall, Cladribine was efficacious and well tolerated, 12% of patients required a new DMT prescription after a median time of 24 months. The regression model revealed that patients aged >40 years at Cladribine prescription had a 16% decrease in likelihood of receiving a new DMT. Heatmaps showed patients previously on Fingolimod had a lower rate (72.2%) of being free from therapy after Cladribine. Conclusion: In our multicentric real-world Italian study, Cladribine therapy is generally effective during the investigated follow-up period. Understanding key characteristics of patients responding best to Cladribine can help tailor therapeutic strategies for optimal outcomes.
ISSN:1756-2864