Evaluation of [Cu]Cu-DOTA and [Cu]Cu-CB-TE2A Chelates for Targeted Positron Emission Tomography with an αβ-Specific Peptide
Significant upregulation of the integrin α v β 6 has been described as a prognostic indicator in several cancers, making it an attractive target for tumor imaging. This study compares variants of a PEGylated α v β 6 -targeting peptide, bearing either an [>18F]fluorobenzoyl prosthetic group ([ 18...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2009-03-01
|
Series: | Molecular Imaging |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2009.00015 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841564465284251648 |
---|---|
author | Sven H. Hausner David L. Kukis M. Karen J. Gagnon Catherine E. Stanecki Riccardo Ferdani John F. Marshall Carolyn J. Anderson Julie L. Sutcliffe |
author_facet | Sven H. Hausner David L. Kukis M. Karen J. Gagnon Catherine E. Stanecki Riccardo Ferdani John F. Marshall Carolyn J. Anderson Julie L. Sutcliffe |
author_sort | Sven H. Hausner |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Significant upregulation of the integrin α v β 6 has been described as a prognostic indicator in several cancers, making it an attractive target for tumor imaging. This study compares variants of a PEGylated α v β 6 -targeting peptide, bearing either an [>18F]fluorobenzoyl prosthetic group ([ 18 F]FBA-PEG-A20FMDV2) or different [ 64 Cu]copper chelators (DOTA-PEG-A20FMDV2, CB-TE2A-PEG-A20FMDV2). The compounds were evaluated in vitro by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (against the integrin α v β 6 and the closely related integrin α v β 6 ) and by cell labeling (α v β 6 -positive DX3puroβ6/α v β 6 -negative DX3puro) and in vivo using micro-positron emission tomography in a mouse model bearing paired DX3puroβ6/Dx3puro xenografts. In vitro, all three compounds showed excellent α v β 6 -specific binding (50% inhibitory concentration [IC 50 ](α v β 6 ) = 3 to g nmol/L; IC 50 (α v β 3 ) > 10 (μmol/L). In vivo, they displayed comparable, preferential uptake for the α v β 6 -expressmg xenograft over the α v β 6 -negative control (> 4:1 ratio at 4 hours postinjection). Whereas [ 64 Cu]Cu-DOTA-PEG-A20FMDV2 resulted in increased levels of radioactivity in the liver, [ 64 Cu]Cu-CB-TE2A-PEG-A20FMDV2 did not. Significantly, both 64 Cu-labeled tracers showed unexpectedly high and persistent levels of radioactivity in the kidneys (> 40% injected dose/g at 4 and 12 hours postinjection). The findings underscore the potential influence of the prosthetic group on targeted in vivo imaging of clinically relevant markers such as α v β 6 . Despite identical targeting peptide moiety and largely equal in vitro behavior, both 64 Cu-labeled tracers displayed inferior pharmacokinetics, making them in their present form less suitable candidates than the 18 F-labeled tracer for in vivo imaging of α v β 6 |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-6f6b4575e93d469e99ad93a943a6c830 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1536-0121 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009-03-01 |
publisher | SAGE Publishing |
record_format | Article |
series | Molecular Imaging |
spelling | doaj-art-6f6b4575e93d469e99ad93a943a6c8302025-01-02T22:39:33ZengSAGE PublishingMolecular Imaging1536-01212009-03-01810.2310/7290.2009.0001510.2310_7290.2009.00015Evaluation of [Cu]Cu-DOTA and [Cu]Cu-CB-TE2A Chelates for Targeted Positron Emission Tomography with an αβ-Specific PeptideSven H. HausnerDavid L. KukisM. Karen J. GagnonCatherine E. StaneckiRiccardo FerdaniJohn F. MarshallCarolyn J. AndersonJulie L. SutcliffeSignificant upregulation of the integrin α v β 6 has been described as a prognostic indicator in several cancers, making it an attractive target for tumor imaging. This study compares variants of a PEGylated α v β 6 -targeting peptide, bearing either an [>18F]fluorobenzoyl prosthetic group ([ 18 F]FBA-PEG-A20FMDV2) or different [ 64 Cu]copper chelators (DOTA-PEG-A20FMDV2, CB-TE2A-PEG-A20FMDV2). The compounds were evaluated in vitro by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (against the integrin α v β 6 and the closely related integrin α v β 6 ) and by cell labeling (α v β 6 -positive DX3puroβ6/α v β 6 -negative DX3puro) and in vivo using micro-positron emission tomography in a mouse model bearing paired DX3puroβ6/Dx3puro xenografts. In vitro, all three compounds showed excellent α v β 6 -specific binding (50% inhibitory concentration [IC 50 ](α v β 6 ) = 3 to g nmol/L; IC 50 (α v β 3 ) > 10 (μmol/L). In vivo, they displayed comparable, preferential uptake for the α v β 6 -expressmg xenograft over the α v β 6 -negative control (> 4:1 ratio at 4 hours postinjection). Whereas [ 64 Cu]Cu-DOTA-PEG-A20FMDV2 resulted in increased levels of radioactivity in the liver, [ 64 Cu]Cu-CB-TE2A-PEG-A20FMDV2 did not. Significantly, both 64 Cu-labeled tracers showed unexpectedly high and persistent levels of radioactivity in the kidneys (> 40% injected dose/g at 4 and 12 hours postinjection). The findings underscore the potential influence of the prosthetic group on targeted in vivo imaging of clinically relevant markers such as α v β 6 . Despite identical targeting peptide moiety and largely equal in vitro behavior, both 64 Cu-labeled tracers displayed inferior pharmacokinetics, making them in their present form less suitable candidates than the 18 F-labeled tracer for in vivo imaging of α v β 6https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2009.00015 |
spellingShingle | Sven H. Hausner David L. Kukis M. Karen J. Gagnon Catherine E. Stanecki Riccardo Ferdani John F. Marshall Carolyn J. Anderson Julie L. Sutcliffe Evaluation of [Cu]Cu-DOTA and [Cu]Cu-CB-TE2A Chelates for Targeted Positron Emission Tomography with an αβ-Specific Peptide Molecular Imaging |
title | Evaluation of [Cu]Cu-DOTA and [Cu]Cu-CB-TE2A Chelates for Targeted Positron Emission Tomography with an αβ-Specific Peptide |
title_full | Evaluation of [Cu]Cu-DOTA and [Cu]Cu-CB-TE2A Chelates for Targeted Positron Emission Tomography with an αβ-Specific Peptide |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of [Cu]Cu-DOTA and [Cu]Cu-CB-TE2A Chelates for Targeted Positron Emission Tomography with an αβ-Specific Peptide |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of [Cu]Cu-DOTA and [Cu]Cu-CB-TE2A Chelates for Targeted Positron Emission Tomography with an αβ-Specific Peptide |
title_short | Evaluation of [Cu]Cu-DOTA and [Cu]Cu-CB-TE2A Chelates for Targeted Positron Emission Tomography with an αβ-Specific Peptide |
title_sort | evaluation of cu cu dota and cu cu cb te2a chelates for targeted positron emission tomography with an αβ specific peptide |
url | https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2009.00015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT svenhhausner evaluationofcucudotaandcucucbte2achelatesfortargetedpositronemissiontomographywithanabspecificpeptide AT davidlkukis evaluationofcucudotaandcucucbte2achelatesfortargetedpositronemissiontomographywithanabspecificpeptide AT mkarenjgagnon evaluationofcucudotaandcucucbte2achelatesfortargetedpositronemissiontomographywithanabspecificpeptide AT catherineestanecki evaluationofcucudotaandcucucbte2achelatesfortargetedpositronemissiontomographywithanabspecificpeptide AT riccardoferdani evaluationofcucudotaandcucucbte2achelatesfortargetedpositronemissiontomographywithanabspecificpeptide AT johnfmarshall evaluationofcucudotaandcucucbte2achelatesfortargetedpositronemissiontomographywithanabspecificpeptide AT carolynjanderson evaluationofcucudotaandcucucbte2achelatesfortargetedpositronemissiontomographywithanabspecificpeptide AT julielsutcliffe evaluationofcucudotaandcucucbte2achelatesfortargetedpositronemissiontomographywithanabspecificpeptide |