Ecological-economic trade-offs in forest conservation: China’s public welfare forest compensation policy on farmers’ production factor reallocation and livelihood diversification

IntroductionChina’s public welfare forest compensation policy is a pivotal environmental governance tool, promoting ecological conservation and advancing the practice of Payments for Environmental Services (PES). While prior studies have primarily focused on short-term ecological or income outcomes,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jian Wei, Xiaotao Huang, Tianwei Xie, Hanxiang Luo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2025.1613517/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849240698172211200
author Jian Wei
Xiaotao Huang
Tianwei Xie
Hanxiang Luo
author_facet Jian Wei
Xiaotao Huang
Tianwei Xie
Hanxiang Luo
author_sort Jian Wei
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionChina’s public welfare forest compensation policy is a pivotal environmental governance tool, promoting ecological conservation and advancing the practice of Payments for Environmental Services (PES). While prior studies have primarily focused on short-term ecological or income outcomes, there remains a lack of research on the policy’s long-term influence on rural households’ production factor allocation and livelihood strategies across forestry, agriculture, and non-agricultural sectors.MethodsThis study employs panel data from 12,810 farming households in 18 counties across 9 provinces, spanning the years 2003 and 2007–2019. A differences-in-differences (DID) model is applied to evaluate the impact of the compensation policy on rural production behaviors, including inputs in forestry, planting, animal husbandry, and labor allocation.ResultsThe analysis reveals that the policy significantly reduces input use in forestry, especially among more actively participating households. It moderately increases non-agricultural labor supply—mainly through labor out-migration—but shows no significant impact on planting or animal husbandry. Although the policy supports under-forest economic activities, it fails to fully compensate for declines in inputs to bamboo, economic, and timber forests. Policy effects vary significantly across different household types, shaped by resource endowments and regional economic contexts.DiscussionThese findings provide robust, long-term empirical evidence on the production-side effects of ecological compensation. The study highlights the importance of designing more nuanced PES policies that account for household heterogeneity and regional disparities, aiming for greater equity and effectiveness in implementation.
format Article
id doaj-art-6f144fb4c2c3485eb35eed43a06696e5
institution Kabale University
issn 2624-893X
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
spelling doaj-art-6f144fb4c2c3485eb35eed43a06696e52025-08-20T04:00:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Forests and Global Change2624-893X2025-08-01810.3389/ffgc.2025.16135171613517Ecological-economic trade-offs in forest conservation: China’s public welfare forest compensation policy on farmers’ production factor reallocation and livelihood diversificationJian Wei0Xiaotao Huang1Tianwei Xie2Hanxiang Luo3College of Economics and Management, Fujian Agricultural and Forestry University, Fuzhou, ChinaFujian Forestry Survey and Design Institute, Fuzhou, ChinaGraduated School of Business Administration, Dong Shin University, Naju, Republic of KoreaCollege of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, ChinaIntroductionChina’s public welfare forest compensation policy is a pivotal environmental governance tool, promoting ecological conservation and advancing the practice of Payments for Environmental Services (PES). While prior studies have primarily focused on short-term ecological or income outcomes, there remains a lack of research on the policy’s long-term influence on rural households’ production factor allocation and livelihood strategies across forestry, agriculture, and non-agricultural sectors.MethodsThis study employs panel data from 12,810 farming households in 18 counties across 9 provinces, spanning the years 2003 and 2007–2019. A differences-in-differences (DID) model is applied to evaluate the impact of the compensation policy on rural production behaviors, including inputs in forestry, planting, animal husbandry, and labor allocation.ResultsThe analysis reveals that the policy significantly reduces input use in forestry, especially among more actively participating households. It moderately increases non-agricultural labor supply—mainly through labor out-migration—but shows no significant impact on planting or animal husbandry. Although the policy supports under-forest economic activities, it fails to fully compensate for declines in inputs to bamboo, economic, and timber forests. Policy effects vary significantly across different household types, shaped by resource endowments and regional economic contexts.DiscussionThese findings provide robust, long-term empirical evidence on the production-side effects of ecological compensation. The study highlights the importance of designing more nuanced PES policies that account for household heterogeneity and regional disparities, aiming for greater equity and effectiveness in implementation.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2025.1613517/fullcompensation policy for public welfare forestsproduction factors inputproduction structurepolicy effectdifferences-in-differences method
spellingShingle Jian Wei
Xiaotao Huang
Tianwei Xie
Hanxiang Luo
Ecological-economic trade-offs in forest conservation: China’s public welfare forest compensation policy on farmers’ production factor reallocation and livelihood diversification
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
compensation policy for public welfare forests
production factors input
production structure
policy effect
differences-in-differences method
title Ecological-economic trade-offs in forest conservation: China’s public welfare forest compensation policy on farmers’ production factor reallocation and livelihood diversification
title_full Ecological-economic trade-offs in forest conservation: China’s public welfare forest compensation policy on farmers’ production factor reallocation and livelihood diversification
title_fullStr Ecological-economic trade-offs in forest conservation: China’s public welfare forest compensation policy on farmers’ production factor reallocation and livelihood diversification
title_full_unstemmed Ecological-economic trade-offs in forest conservation: China’s public welfare forest compensation policy on farmers’ production factor reallocation and livelihood diversification
title_short Ecological-economic trade-offs in forest conservation: China’s public welfare forest compensation policy on farmers’ production factor reallocation and livelihood diversification
title_sort ecological economic trade offs in forest conservation china s public welfare forest compensation policy on farmers production factor reallocation and livelihood diversification
topic compensation policy for public welfare forests
production factors input
production structure
policy effect
differences-in-differences method
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2025.1613517/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jianwei ecologicaleconomictradeoffsinforestconservationchinaspublicwelfareforestcompensationpolicyonfarmersproductionfactorreallocationandlivelihooddiversification
AT xiaotaohuang ecologicaleconomictradeoffsinforestconservationchinaspublicwelfareforestcompensationpolicyonfarmersproductionfactorreallocationandlivelihooddiversification
AT tianweixie ecologicaleconomictradeoffsinforestconservationchinaspublicwelfareforestcompensationpolicyonfarmersproductionfactorreallocationandlivelihooddiversification
AT hanxiangluo ecologicaleconomictradeoffsinforestconservationchinaspublicwelfareforestcompensationpolicyonfarmersproductionfactorreallocationandlivelihooddiversification